Husband Has No Right And Can’t Get Any Share In Parental Property Inherited By Wife: Andhra Pradesh High Court Cites Hindu Succession Act
Can a husband claim his wife’s parental property after her death without children? Andhra Pradesh High Court gives a clear answer—this ruling may surprise many.
AMARAVATI: The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that if a married woman inherits property from her parents and dies without children, that property will go back to her father’s family, not to her husband or his relatives. This judgment comes under the Hindu Succession Act amid property claims.
The Court explained the law in simple terms while referring to Section 15(2)(a) of the Hindu Succession Act.
Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao stated:
Read Also: Husband Asking Wife To Help In-Laws Not Cruelty: 498A
“The bare reading of Section 15(2)(a) of Hindu Succession Act 1956 clearly outlines that if the property is inherited by a female Hindu from her father or mother in the absence of any of child, the property of the deceased shall go to the legal heirs of father. The husband will not get any right over the property inherited by her from her father.”
The case involved a property originally owned by a grandmother. In 2002, she gifted this property to her first granddaughter, and the official records were updated accordingly. However, the granddaughter died in 2005 without any children. After this, the grandmother cancelled the earlier gift and later made a registered will giving the same property to her other granddaughter (the petitioner).
After the grandmother passed away in 2012, the petitioner applied to get the property records updated in her name. The Revenue Divisional Officer allowed this in 2017. But the husband of the deceased granddaughter challenged this decision. The Joint Collector later ruled in his favour and ordered that the property be transferred to him, saying the earlier gift cancellation was not valid.
Read Also: False 498A – 85 BNS Fear And Need Legal Help? The Law Changed, The Risk Remains, The Defence Must Change Too
The petitioner then approached the High Court, arguing that under Section 15(2)(a), the husband has no right over such property since his wife died without children. She also informed the Court that a civil court had already declared their ownership in 2025.
READ ALSO: Husband Convicted Under 498A & 304B Barred From Inheriting Wife’s Estate Despite Silence In Indian Succession Act: Kerala HC Invokes ‘Slayer Rule’
The High Court agreed with the petitioner and made it clear that the husband cannot claim rights in such property and cannot challenge actions taken by the original owner.
The Court further observed:
Read Also: 8 Court Judgments Every Man Should Know in India Before 498A, Maintenance, Custody or Divorce Hits
“… when the unofficial respondent is not entitled for the property pursuant to the Section 15(2)(a) of Hindu Succession Act 1956, the unofficial respondent is not entitled to claim over the property and in view of the same the gift deed executed by the original owner in favour of the wife of 5th unofficial respondent does not get any right over the property”
Finally, the Court allowed the petition, cancelled the earlier order of the Joint Collector, and directed the authorities to update the property records in the petitioner’s name.
Read Also: Drunk Husband Tag Not Proof of Wife’s Murder: HC
Explanatory Table – Laws & Sections Involved
Case Details
Case Title: Chikkala Devika Manasa & Anr. vs State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.
Case Number: Writ Petition No. 12421 of 2023
Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati
Bench: Hon’ble Sri Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
Neutral Citation / Identifier: APHC010233392023
Dates:
Reserved on: 12.03.2026
Pronounced on: 17.03.2026
Uploaded on: 24.03.2026
READ ALSO: Consent Cannot Create a Marriage the Law Never Recognized: Telangana High Court Says Hindu Marriage Act Cannot Be Forced When Husband/Wife Not Governed By The Act
Parties
Petitioners:
Chikkala Devika Manasa
Chikkala Dattathreya
Respondents:
State of Andhra Pradesh
Joint Collector, Anakapalli
Revenue Divisional Officer, Narsipatnam
Tahsildar, Payakaraopeta
Badireddy Naga Veera Venkata Srirama Dora (husband of deceased granddaughter)
Counsels
For Petitioners: G. Venkata Subba Raju
For Respondents: Government Pleader for Revenue
Key Precedents Cited
Thota Ganga Laxmi vs Government of Andhra Pradesh (2010) 15 SCC 207
V. Dandapani Chettiar vs Balasubramanian Chettiar (2003) 6 SCC 633
Radhika vs Aghnu Ram Mahto (1994) 5 SCC 761
Bhagat Ram vs Teja Singh AIR 1999 SC 1944
Bamadev Panigrahi vs Monorama Raj AIR 1974 AP 226
Anandilal Jhariya vs Ramlal Jhariya AIR 2010 MP 21
Key Takeaways
A husband has absolutely no legal right in property inherited by his wife from her parents if she dies without children.
The law prioritizes the woman’s parental family over the husband, even after marriage, showing a clear imbalance in succession rights.
Even long-term marital association or contribution holds no value when it comes to such property claims.
Men can be dragged into litigation over property but still be legally barred from any share, exposing structural unfairness.
This judgment reinforces a pattern where men carry responsibilities in marriage but are systematically denied corresponding legal rights in property matters.
Click Here to Download Judgment – Chikkala Devika Manasa & Anr. vs State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors
This Could Change Your Case-Get FREE Legal Advice-Click Here!
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the Indian courts and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of “ShoneeKapoor.com” or its affiliates. This article is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content provided is not legal advice, and viewers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. Viewer discretion is advised.
