Is Agnostisim possible?
Agnosticism an idea that says we cannot know for sure if a creator exists or not. It takes people to a dead end in a way similar to atheism, because it's an idea filled with thousands of contradictions. We claim that god's existence is as clear as the sun, but how? let's answer diagnostic thought with two key sentences. The universe tells us about the existence of a creator by its every single point, but agnosticism does not accept the creator, because it has an established rule that nothing can be known with certainty unless we observe it materially. Unfortunately, people supporting this thought can find their reasoning to material beings which limits their ability of questioning. However, we cannot expect the creator of the matter to be in the formal matter right. In fact people believe in many things that they do not see materially. For example, mother's compassion. It's something you have witnessed since you came to the world isn't it? Who can deny the existence of compassion? Nobody! But nobody can show compassion materially.
Or free will. For example you read this paper of your own free will but nobody can show it materially. Or justice, brotherhood, love. We already accept many immaterial concepts.
This is a big part of our life. When it comes to the creator, the mind restricting idea that you shouldn't accept anything unless you see it materially is being imposed on us. It's interesting. It's like the devil has a trick in this. What do you think? However, even matter itself points to a creator.
The first key sentence which refutes agnosticism is that <<IF THERE IS KNOWLEDGE THE UNKNOWN DISAPPEARS>>. If a detective investigates and finds a lot of evidence of a criminal, would you say “I never know the criminal, because I did not see the criminal”. Of course, no! If there is knowledge the unknown will disappear with signs and evidence. We can see it with our minds just like that, we can read and study the universe like a book. Whatever we look at, we can see evidence for God. We can find a creator with the evidence we infer from matter. We can even say this: There isn't anything that does not point out to the creator. Even when we look at the most basic structural matter, the atom.
We come across dozens of proofs. Raindrops of mercy coming from the cloud, which lacks compassion. The emergence of a complex human being, from a simple drop of water everyday…Atoms lacking KNOWLEDGE, WILL, LIFE and POWER are all working like a skilled master soldier in every point of the universe. So everything is a window which opens to the creator for our minds. As a result, if there is knowledge, the unknown disappears.
The other key sentence, which refuse agnosticism is that << ADJECTIVES CANNOT EXIST WITHOUT SOMEONE HOLDING THEM>>. So if there is an attribute, it must have someone to hold it. For example, if we see the water droplets shining on the sea, we need to explain. Either we say there is a sun in the sky (even if we don't see it) or we have to accept the being of the tiny suns in each water droplet. Because if there are shining water droplets there has to be a source of light for their shining. We can't just leave it out. Seeing that there is no sun in every water droplet, we have to accept this sun in the sky as their source of light. Just like this example, when we look at the atoms in the universe, we see that they require dozens of adjectives such as knowledge will power and life. Atoms work like a master soldier everywhere. For example, atoms work regularly in different parts of our body. They take part in the metabolic activities of 350 000 people born every day. The atom that cannot see, seems to create an eye that can see. The atom that cannot hear, seems to create an ear that can hear. The atom that has no feelings, seems to create a person with a lot of senses. Or it can transmit thousands of different sounds in the air without ever confusing, and it can take a suitable structure wherever it enters. So they work everywhere at every stage without confusing and we see that dozens of adjectives have emerged from so many verbs.
But as we said adjectives cannot exist without holders. So the question is: Who is the holder of dozens of attributes is such as knowledge, will, power, life, compassion, wisdom that we infer from the way atoms are acting? Just as we accept a sun in the example of sun and water droplets shouldn't I accept the creator holding these attributes definitely required by Atoms? But we know these properties do not exist in atoms. So it means that there has to be a creator holding all these attributes. We can talk about dozens of more evidence for the existence of Allah (God )and we will inshaallah ("If God wills) so don't forget follow and like!
