#rememberyamal

[neverendingaudit]

Manufacturing Windows

[neverendingaudit]

Do you mean that after almost a decade you are finally going to get around to answering this question [When you remove the bristlecones and the Briffa chronologies, is there still a HS reconstruction?]?

Boris, noticing it's been awhile.

[neverendingaudit]

Maybe.

The Auditor, answering his own rhetorical question: > Is Briffa Finally Cornered?

[neverendingaudit]

This quote ["It is not my belief that Briffa crudely cherry picked"] is from comment number 254 in one of the Climate Audit threads. And it doesn’t particularly square with what he said elsewhere. It is most definitely not the message that his readers got [...]

Bart Verheggen, with a good run-down of yet another tempest in a teapot.

[neverendingaudit]

You can’t be serious.

The Auditor, perhaps being serious when he's conflating Osborne's response with Briffa's.

[neverendingaudit]

In his response, [the Auditor] doesn’t seem to understand what Hantemirov is saying he did wrong. This does not surprise me because he still doesn’t understand why the other series in question isn’t published by the CRU. He also doesn’t seem to understand what the word “stolen” means.

grypo, commenting on the Auditor's response to Hantemirov.

[neverendingaudit]

Too bad, but I don’t think that it would have made any difference.

The Auditor, after noticing that his email to Hantemirov was stuck in Drafts.

[neverendingaudit]

Hantemirov Responds

[The Auditor has no reason to disbelieve the genuineness of this comment.]

You did not define what you compare, what dataset used in each case, how data were processed, and what was the reason for that, what limitation there are, what kind of additional information you need to know.

Why didn’t you ask me for all the details?

You even aren’t ashamed of using information from stolen letters.

Do carelessness, grubbiness, dishonourableness are the necessary concomitants of your job?

With disrespect…