Thanks for your answer. I was just curious cuz i used that song for college auditions and I must clarify the term "simple" was in no disrespect. I used it because my choir teacher picked it up quickly and the pianist at the audition was able to as well (after humming how it's supposed to sound for him). Also could you explain what you mean by Stars and the Moon isn't a straight forward piece?
Don’t worry, I didn’t take it as disrespectful! I think we just hear it and feel that it may be simple when it’s not necessarily that straight forward. But humming how it’s supposed to sound may be the key to succeeding in it, but again, it’s a risk when you aren’t sure what kind of accompanist you’re going to get.
So, with most pieces, we don’t have so many moving pieces going on. I looked at the sheet music for this piece, and we’ve just got so much going on, and it’s not very intuitive. That is, when we (as accompanists) look at pieces, we make a lot of shortcuts in our brains. We take leaps in logic and make educated guesses on how it’s supposed to sound based on our knowledge of music and styles. Usually, we don’t actually read the music note for note, shockingly! But when we have pieces like this or Sondheim, they don’t always follow those concepts that we’re familiar with, and there is no way to take those mental shortcuts. So the brain power (and skill!) it takes is much greater than the majority of MT pieces! I hope that makes sense!