you have no place making terf comparisons if you're not a trans woman/impacted by transmisogyny. if trans women want to compare the rhetoric, that's up to THEM, and if they don't, that's ALSO up to them. not you. it doesn't matter how many you know, because there are plenty of other trans women who have expressed discomfort with people who aren't trans women pulling this shit. cut it out.
I’m not making “TERF comparisons,” I’m talking about their rhetoric. TERFs are evil. They target marginalized people, disabled people, scared people. They find ways to make their rhetoric palatable. Discourse on this site (especially in LGBTQ+ and feminist circles) is rife with hidden TERF rhetoric. They’re using the ace discourse to indoctrinate people.
My point is that we need to be aware of what’s really being said. I don’t think people are even necessarily doing it out of malice, it’s just something we don’t think about as much as we should.
But like you said, it’s not my place to comment on that. I’m trans, so I am a target, but I’m not their primary target because I’m TME. TERFs will never seek to hurt me in the way that they hurt trans women.
So, if any trans women want to contribute?
EDIT: This post wasn’t worded super well. In the first paragraph, I meant that TERFs target those people for indoctrination. And I’m not claiming anyone is a TERF or even intentionally using their rhetoric, and I’m not even going to go into the radfem thing because I have no idea what that means. I just meant that TME (transmisogyny exempt) people in particular need to be careful of where our arguments are coming from. Compulsory heterosexuality seems like good queer theory, but it comes from TERF rhetoric and is used specifically to hurt trans women and, to a lesser extent, bi and multi-spec people (especially bi women).And I’m sorry that I made that other post in anger. I exaggerated and said stuff that was out of my lane, but I still think this is a valid discussion about how harmful rhetoric can infect communities.