Who goes after indie developers that have zero influence in the gaming journalism world over who they sleep with? That guy didn't even write anything about depression quest
imo regardless of which “side” they’re on, anyone who still tries to make this about Zoe Quinn is missing the point spectacularly
people responded with (rightful, if perhaps a bit premature given that they didn’t have the facts yet) anger upon finding out that a game developer had been sleeping with game journalists at the exact time that her game was being circulated and reviewed, particularly on websites that the journalists in question were directly affiliated with. moreover, the game in question really wasn’t very good from an objective viewpoint—it was a pretty flawed representation of the subject matter, for one thing, and it literally restricted player choice and gameplay in a manner that was meant to be a metaphor for depression, but again, fell flat and just ended up being frustrating—but received oddly glowing reviews from the websites in question. both factors led to a lot of suspicion about possible collusion and/or bias.
in my opinion, the real issue didn’t come to light until the journalists in question responded to that suspicion by… ignoring legitimate concerns and complaints, banning anyone with even the most polite criticism or suspicion of their methods from making comments on their websites, colluding in secret to attempt to discredit their detractors by insulting the very hobby their jobs depended on, and just generally responding to accusations of journalistic corruption with more journalistic corruption
i wouldnt care if it were just about Zoe Quinn, but the fact that any attempts to uncover the truth of the issue (i.e. whether or not personal relationships with the developer played a part in reviews) were silenced so quickly and enthusiastically by the journalists under scrutiny reveals quite a lot about the game journalism industry and its attitude towards the crazy notion that journalists should be more transparent with regards to any personal relationships with other figures in the industry. i don’t care if you’re sleeping with them or w/e, just let us know that you happen to know them on a personal level so we can be aware of any biases that may or may not exist. this is like entry-level being-a-reliable-source shit and games are never going to be taken seriously, no matter how beautiful and artistic they may be, if the industry in charge of reporting on them doesn’t grow up and start acting like legitimate journalists
this was longer than i intended but the tl;dr is: you can be anti-people-using-gamergate-as-an-excuse-to-harass-other-people. i am that. most people that aren’t the ones using gamergate as an excuse to harass other people are that. but gamergate sprung up as a reaction to the events above, so anyone proclaiming themselves anti-gamergate is at the very least indirectly defending the actions of those journalists. i don’t understand why anyone would do that