Discussion: Interesting Social Commentary in The Gentleman Physician by Sally Britton
To read this post on my blog instead, click here!
The Gentleman Physician, a summary
To begin with, lets have a potentially spoilery summary of The Gentleman Physician so you have some context. In the first book of the Branches of Love series, we are introduced to Julia Devon as a side character. She is the resigned, twenty-three year old spinster sister whose family knows only that when she had her debut in London she gravely disappointed their father and returned home unmarried. She confides in her sister that she fell in love with a man who was training to be a physician, and that man attempted to bring his suit to her father who soundly rejected him. Julia, herself, rejected him in an attempt to set him free from his love for her.
Following her sister Christine’s marriage to a man deemed unsuitable by their father, Julia is effectively banished from the Devon home in Kettering and sent to Bath to help her cousin, Virginia. Virginia’s husband is dying, attended to by Doctor Hastings–the same doctor Julia fell in love with. When reunited, the two realize they still have feelings for one another but struggle with their past, as well as prioritizing Virginia’s troubles. Most notably, Nathaniel must come to terms with Julia’s rejection of him and realize the reasons behind it had nothing to do with her own feelings.
Marriage for love versus status and money
As is often the case in a Regency romance, the main conflict of this book is the focus on love matches versus marriages of convenience. Julia had previously defied her father’s expectations of marrying for money and status, but also resigned herself to never marrying at all with the knowledge that his blessing was unlikely. In the first book, The Social Tutor, we actually meet Mr. Devon and learn just how far his ambitions for his daughters’ marriages go, so it’s unsurprising that Julia has some underlying trauma from being raised by him. All of the characters in this book, however, see marriage as ideally built on love. Virginia loves her husband very much and married him despite his status as a baron being lower than her own unmarried social status. Nathaniel’s friends, too, urge him to marry for love since as a physician with a decent income he can afford to support a wife and should choose one who makes him happy.
We really take for granted today that our physicians and surgeons wash their hands. This was a controversial idea when it was first introduced, but ultimately was proven to reduce the health risks to the patients. Nathaniel is very intent on this, teaching Virginia and Julia how to “properly” wash their hands when dealing with the dying baron, so as to avoid worsening his condition or transmitting his disease to anyone else in the household. I thought this was an interesting little detail to include in the story.
Discrediting women, and “hysteria”
One of the brief subplots of this novel involves Mr. Macon, the baron’s younger brother. The two brothers weren’t friendly at the beginning of the book and by all appearances it seems the two are trying to reconcile when Mr. Macon arrives unexpectedly in Bath to visit his dying older brother. However, it quickly becomes clear that Mr. Macon has nefarious purposes when he begins work to prove his own brother mentally unfit so that he can void the will. His goal is to gain custody of his two nephews, as well as the estates and money that they are heirs to. He plans to do this by demonstrating that Virginia is an unfit mother, and his brother was incorrect in naming her legal guardian of her own sons.
When this plot becomes evident, Julia immediately works against it and discusses the issue with Nathaniel, and his friend who is a solicitor. The two men explain to Julia that it’s quite common for a male relative to fight in court for custody of nephews with inheritance, and that often they win by nature of how women are regarded. Emotions and the way Virginia could potentially react in her time of grieving work against her, despite the rational characters in the plot pointing out that this is a ridiculous way to discredit a mother.
One line from this story really stuck out to me, and it was during Nathaniel’s reflections on his feelings for Julia. As they begin to reignite, he confides in close friends and slowly comes to terms with his still having feelings for the woman who rejected him. Despite this rejection, he realizes (after learning what Julia’s father is like) that as an eighteen year old woman Julia didn’t have the autonomy to accept his courtship. It takes this realization for Nathaniel to really begin to accept his feelings for Julia persist. This is a really interesting commentary on feminine autonomy in the time period, because it’s true: at eighteen, Julia was not really in the position to defy her father and marry a man whose education and career were insecure. After a few years apart, Nathaniel has completed his training and begun a career that could support himself and a wife, leaving her the option to leave her father without his permission and marry Nathaniel.
This isn’t a groundbreaking look at social commentary for the time period, nor is this a great example of heavy social thought in a novel. But I did find these aspects interesting because I think they say a lot about how the author views the historical period the novel is set. There’s a lot of misconceptions out there especially about idealized and romanticized periods of history. Seeing an author take the time to give their characters views on society and hygiene that are in general agreed upon by the cast of characters was refreshing and enjoyable!
If you enjoyed this content and would like to help me continue to make content, please consider joining my Patreon or purchasing a tarot card reading from my Fiverr!
Patreon | Fiverr | Twitter | Tumblr | Instagram | Goodreads