#1:Talking about Q's moral code: 1/ he left his child for good 2/ he wasn't able to be with his child's mother 3/ he used A over years, for private&professional reasons 4/ he also e.g. 'used' his landlord lady when HE needed a kind of extraction & HE decided when he had enough of it 5/ he killed people, certainly not without collateral damages. So you can argue abt his reasons for all his bad actions, but in the end I don't see him having a incompatible or even a 'better' moral code as C. #2...
#2: In fact, C took responsibility for her bad actions&changed them: 1/ she decided to go back to her child 2/ she was 'willing' to be with her child's father, B 3&4/ same, but with different partners. in the end she stopped that behaviour (Jonas/refused Otto) 5/ same, but she quits CIA. Don't get me wrong, I love C&Q/CD&RF deeply, but what RF said abt moral code is not correct from my POV as a viewer for years now.
I feel you, dude. It’s clear to me that Rupert is channeling Quinn’s heart — admittedly, I don’t think that Peter Quinn or any other iteration of this man ever really had a chance.
Carrie makes choices and has follow-through, and occasionally it’s to the detriment of the people she loves — most notably, to Quinn, and we love him. So it’s really easy to nod along with Rupert.
That said, on my previous post on the subject, I got an utterly amazing comment by our lovely reader and friend, @inchbyinch68:
I believe Quinn's accusations that Carrie is responsible for his disabilities are along the same lines as his belief that she "took him down when his back was turned." He is experiencing clinical delusions of paranoia that are especially confusing because of the real threats he faces and Carrie's real harmful actions. What an interesting story to explore! These writers are genius for setting this up. I can't wait for the story to continue.
Good god, this show is a mess.