#scotus decision

[tearsofrefugees]

Supreme Court's ‘Unjustifiable Decision’ Sparks Fears For U.S. Health Care System

“The human cost will be felt all across America,” one advocate warned.

[thishumblehobbyist]

Funny how the TERFs and rad fems are quiet about the SCOTUS decision regarding planned parenthood being fucked.

A service that saves women’s lives daily through healthcare and medical treatment and not a peep. But they are talking about Joe Anne the terf twit demanding women be spied on in bathrooms and have their pictures distributed online. They are all for that for some reason … cause it “protects women” somehow

These twits don’t give a fuck about women and never did and it shows every time women’s rights take a hit.

[naonicblog2]

The Supreme Court's tariff decision extends far beyond tariffs

It stops Trump from deciding not to spend money Congress appropriated, and from going to war without Congress's approval

[everyendeavor]

Supreme Court Backs Trump on Deportations With Short Notice By Greg Stohr (Bloomberg)
June 23, 2025, 4:33 PM EDT, updated at June 23, 2025, 5:43 PM EDT A sharply divided US Supreme Court let the Trump administration resume quickly deporting migrants to countries other than their own, lifting a judge’s order that gave people 10 days notice and a chance to argue they would be at risk of torture. Over a scathing dissent from the court’s three liberals, the high court granted an emergency request from the administration, which said the order from a Massachusetts federal judge usurped presidential authority and interfered with diplomatic efforts. As is often the case with emergency orders, the court as a whole gave no explanation. But dissenting Justice Sonia Sotomayor accused the majority of “rewarding lawlessness,” saying the administration had violated the judge’s earlier order when it tried to send a group of men to South Sudan with less than 24 hours notice. “Apparently, the court finds the idea that thousands will suffer in farflung locales more palatable than the remote possibility that a district court exceeded its remedial powers,” Sotomayor wrote. She said she “cannot join so gross an abuse” of the high court’s authority. Fellow liberal Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson joined the dissent. The decision blocks the trial court order while litigation continues over efforts to deport people to so-called “third countries” — places other than their home nation or an alternative ordered by an immigration judge.  The order marks a shift for the Supreme Court. The justices previously pushed back against the administration’s efforts to send some immigrants to harsh or potentially dangerous locations with minimal advance notice. The Supreme Court said in April the government must give people a “reasonable time” to challenge their deportations. Notice Required US Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the Supreme Court the latest case involved “some of the worst of the worst illegal aliens,” people who committed such heinous crimes that their home countries won’t take them back.  US District Judge Brian Murphy on April 18 barred the government from conducting so-called third-country deportations without giving people a chance to argue that they would be at risk of persecution or torture. The following month, Murphy said the government violated his order by trying to quickly fly eight men to South Sudan, a country under a State Department ‘Do Not Travel’ advisory. The men are now being held in a converted shipping container at a US naval base in Djibouti, the government said in a June 5 court filing. As part of his follow-up decision, Murphy said people had to be provided notice in a language they could understand and given 10 days to claim they had reason to fear persecution or torture. Should the administration reject a person’s claim, the migrant would have 15 days to seek to reopen immigration proceedings. The men “are simply asking to be told they are going to be deported to a new country before they are taken to such a country, and be given an opportunity to explain why such a deportation will likely result in their persecution, torture, and/or death,” Murphy wrote in the April 18 order. “This small modicum of process is mandated by the Constitution of the United States.” The case is among a growing number of instances of judges finding that US officials didn’t fully comply with court orders stemming from Trump’s hard-line immigration policies. The case is Department of Homeland Security v. D.V.D., 24A1153. (Updates with longer excerpt from dissent in fourth paragraph.)

[useyourblinker]

Supreme Court blocks Biden's student loan forgiveness program | CNN Politics

In a stinging defeat for President Joe Biden, the Supreme Court blocked the administration’s student loan forgiveness plan Friday, rejecting

People are already stretched so thin. This is just another hit.

Congress passed a law forgiving the PPP loans, a lot of which were taken by themselves. Seems the deck is stacked. The economy is going to tank. It's too top heavy.

[goodolewoody]

CNN BREAKING NEWS . . .

CNN BREAKING NEWS . . .

In a crushing blow to the White House, the Supreme Court Thursday announced it was evenly divided in a case concerning the President’s controversial executive actions on immigration.

The ruling means that the program will remain blocked from going into effect, and the issue will return to the lower court. It is exceedingly unlikely the programs will go into effect for the remainder of the Obama…

View On WordPress

[sorrynotsorrybi]

jeannisnotebook replied to your post “Did you come out after the SCOTUS decision?”

I did! I chickened out three times during the actual day and then my mom went to work and when she came home I told her about one of the sweet old couples and she said "are you sure you're heterosexual?" And I said nope! My mom and I are all good.

"Are you sure you’re heterosexual?”

That’s adorable! I’m so happy for you that it went well! 

Sometimes it’s easier when a parent asks you (as long as they also make it clear they’re accepting), because it can feel really awkward to start the conversation. My dad did that with me, by praising my girlfriend at the time and then saying “Mom and I have just assumed for a while you’re together.” I actually had come out to my mom beforehand, but it was nice that my dad made it easier to come out to him by opening up the topic first. 

Hurray for the success stories!!

[teapartycrusaders-blog]

[VIDEO]: ISIS ‘Celebrates’ SCOTUS Decision by Tossing 4 Accused Gay Men Off Roof

[VIDEO]: ISIS ‘Celebrates’ SCOTUS Decision by Tossing 4 Accused Gay Men Off Roof

http://launch.newsinc.com/?type=VideoPlayer/Single&widgetId=1&trackingGroup=69016&siteSection=breitbart_nws_wld_sty_vmpp&videoId=29309595 The jihadist terror group Islamic State responded to the Supreme Court’s recent decision on gay marriage by killing accused gay men by pushing them off a roof. Released on the same day as the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision legalizing homosexual marriage across…

View On WordPress