State Electricity Tariffs
KERC’s corrigendum to the MSEZ Tariff Order 2025 is a reminder that in STATE ELECTRICITY TARIFFS, precision in language is as important as accuracy in numbers. The Commission corrected a typographical error in a table that had incorrectly described the allocation of distribution network costs between HT and LT consumers.
While the table text showed a 30:70 split, the actual tariff calculations were consistently based on a 95% HT and 5% LT allocation. The corrigendum confirms that there is no change in tariffs, revenue recovery, or consumer impact—only a correction to ensure textual consistency.
For analysts following STATE ELECTRICITY TARIFFS, the clarification is more than cosmetic. Tariff orders often form the basis for audits, ARR true-ups, and appellate review. A mismatch between narrative and calculation can create avoidable regulatory risk, even when financial outcomes are unaffected.
The reaffirmed 95:5 allocation reflects the physical reality of SEZ distribution systems. In MSEZ, network costs are driven primarily by HT infrastructure, while LT networks serve a limited role. Maintaining this allocation protects cost-reflectivity and avoids cross-subsidisation distortions.
KERC’s prompt issuance of a corrigendum strengthens the legal robustness of the tariff order and signals heightened documentation discipline. As STATE ELECTRICITY TARIFFS evolve toward longer control periods and more explicit cost attribution, such corrections help preserve regulatory certainty.
For consumers and utilities alike, the message is reassurance rather than change: billing outcomes remain unchanged, and the tariff framework stands as originally approved—now with clearer wording, State electricity tariffs, KERC corrigendum, MSEZ power tariff, distribution network costs, electricity tariff regulation.