Mar 27
trying to rob a mathematician at gunpoint but they just go "actually let N be the amount of bullets loaded in your gun." and proceed to prove that there are 0 bullet in your gun despite there being bullets in your gun. when you then try to fire it, not only does the bullet deflect (because they are now bullet proof) but your gun explodes because it is proven that there are no bullets in your gun at the time before you fired it. however firing it proves the past tense existence of a bullet at the same time there is not a bullet. this is a contradiction, and P>(~P>Q)