I ponder the question. Does it really matter? 13.73 cubic inches of food and roughly 2 dollars and 78 cents from my pocket. And more importantly, if I spent the 2 dollars and 78 cents, made the chef spoon out the extra 13.73 cubic inches of food, the waiter carry the bowl taking up an extra 21.19 square inches of space -- if I did all that -- would I then feel obligated to eat into the 13.73 cubic inches of extra food for all our sakes, and what would be the benefit to my body? If it is purely enjoyment, then what about the hard-to-quantify diminishing returns each bite offers? Do I really think I can sustain the cognitive energy to appreciate the food far enough into the extra 13.73 cubic inches to warrant the price? And at what cost to my mental state, how much time would it take, what about the temperature of the food by the time I reach the superfluous bits? Assuming we can ignore the question of thermodynamics. Ha! As if I can simply pretend I don't already know which receptacle will lose the least amount of heat in the time it takes me to consume the contents. And then there's the question of hunger and where it becomes excess and how long it takes to feel the repercussions of overindulgence? But let's not forgot those 2 dollars and 78 cents - from a fraction of an hour of work, but what if it was one of those unbearable hours of work? Certainly not worth an extra 13.73 cubic inches of food. And perhaps I would prefer to spend 2.78$ on a 16oz latte or a 12oz with extra flavor? Would the pleasure to time ratio be greater if I made such a choice? Would my hunger, my cravings be more satisfied? - and, of course, one can't be more satisfied. One either is or is not satisfied. So, I ask again, does it really matter?