@sisterof replied to your post “@sisterof replied to your post: “me, brainstorming new names for the...”
yeah but regarding that last paragraph - it's not about external policing, but people inside the community are too diverse to agree on what terms are "allowed". not sure there is a way to put everyone under a single banner
I wasn’t talking about external policing at all. When I said “discourse” I was talking about internal discourse, within the queer community. I was talking about queer people telling other queer people what terms they can and can’t use for themselves.
My point is -- we don’t HAVE to agree. We should respect what terms other people use, and feel comfortable knowing we can use or not use whatever terms we personally prefer, without jumping down each other’s throats whenever someone uses a term someone somewhere has decided is “problematic.”
The community squabbling about whether the best umbrella term is “LGBTQ” or “LGBTQIA+” or “queer” or “gay” or something else entirely just creates internal divisions and prevents us from UNIFYING at a time when we need to be unified.
In other words, what we call ourselves as a community is a pointless debate as long as what we ARE as a community is something that can still be legally discriminated against in this country.
That’s my opinion. And I know it’s a complicated issue and that it’s not as simple as everyone just getting along, but like I said. The discourse drains me.