OOC: private message log
Private message log between @skyspoutingviolets and @staringtowardthestars following this post.
staringtowardthestars
Pardon me, but I was wondering if your most recent post was directed at me?
skyspoutingviolets
...it wasn't *directed* at you, but yes, it's about you.
"i've seen too many green radicals plot to commit serious pollution violations" right, because personal experience. it's no wonder you had to get a blue to bribe your judge.
i don't even know what to say, honestly. you clearly have some serious mental health problems -- i doubt there's anything i can say to make you understand how despicable your actions were.
staringtowardthestars
Just because I've seen something occur doesn't necessarily imply that I've participated in it.
(Also, she didn't bribe my judge.)
Also, in case it wasn't clear from the post, I am against people doing what you are suggesting that I did. (I completely understand if your suspicions mean that you no longer wish to interact with me.)
skyspoutingviolets
of course seeing something happen doesn't imply you were the one who did it. but in this case, it's obvious that you were.
and yes, that post does say you're against people doing this. but only because they'll get caught! you said *nothing at all* about why it's inherently wrong to spread pollution
you said, in as many words, "pollution is unimportant." which. just. go to hell.
staringtowardthestars
That was intended as a statement about their goals, not a statement about objective reality. The sort of person who would do that presumably thinks, at least to some extent, that pollution is unimportant.
Also, if someone already thinks pollution is unimportant, telling them that an action is bad because it will spread pollution is highly unlikely to be persuasive. In contrast, pointing out the potential harm if they are caught might be.
skyspoutingviolets
well i suppose, but it's still -- i mean, it's like saying "hey, if you believe it's good to assault people, don't do that, because you'll get arrested." it's hard to imagine how sane and decent person could write a long post on the subject while failing to mention that, in addition to being illegal, it's *wrong*.
staringtowardthestars
Perhaps we disagree on means of effective persuasion. If someone thinks it's good to assault people, telling them that it's actually wrong to assault people will probably not be convincing, and it might make them less likely to take other parts of the argument seriously.
skyspoutingviolets
nobody who seriously believed it's immoral to commit assault (or pollution violations, or the like) would write a series of posts about it in which the only reason they give against it is that it's illegal and you'll get caught.
i don't know why i'm continuing this conversation, it's pointless for me to try to reason with you
staringtowardthestars
I entirely understand if thinking about this topic is distressing you! If you don't want to talk to me anymore, I'll respect that, and I won't interact with your posts.
skyspoutingviolets
well, okay, that would be appreciated
staringtowardthestars
Understood.
skyspoutingviolets
but i'm going to say this one last thing even if, as you say, it's not going to persuade you: purposefully spreading pollution is a horrible thing to do. it hurts people, especially hypersensitives like me. and anyone who thinks that it's a good idea needs mental health treatment.












