#slo7

[stemlyns]

Medical boarding extracts a crowding tax in deaths, delays and bed-days. New research quantifies it, and suggests it is fixable from within.

JC: Boarding, the crowding tax and a fixable problem

[stemlyns]

What does excellence in emergency medicine really look like? Less heroics, more reliability, self-awareness, teamwork and doing the basics well. From @dftb26 in Glasgow

DFTB26: Doing the Fundamentals Extraordinarily Well

[stemlyns]

How should we resuscitate patients with septic shock in the emergency department? It remains one of the most controversial questions in emergency medicine and critical care. For years, clinicians have debated whether early aggressive fluid resuscitation should remain the cornerstone of sepsis management, or whether earlier vasopressor use might offer a safer and more effective approach. Presented this week at Critical Care Reviews 2026 and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the ARISE-FLUIDS trial is one of the largest randomised studies to compare early vasopressors and restricted fluids against a more traditional fluid-based resuscitation strategy in septic shock. The results are important, thought-provoking and, perhaps surprisingly, reassuring for clinicians on both sides of the debate.

To squeeze or not to squeeze. The ARISE-FLUIDS trial