#sml criticism

[pleasantspark]

And the similarities?

All three of them have children in their fanbase and adults who refuse to accept or understand criticism!

[pleasantspark]

Whenever someone like SML Stans and Viv Stans use "But but [irrelevant media] did this so it's fine!" It's a weak excuse because the media you're trying to compare it to doesn't have the glaring issues both have. I'm tired of fuckin hearing SOUTH PARK DID THIS and PRINCESS AND THE FROG DID THAT!

South Park is a different ballgame. It's humor is meant to be offensive and even then they know their limits. South Park caters to metahumor and mocking groups. It's the KiwiFarms of Adult Cartoons in a good way. Unlike both listed. South Park doesn't double down on the humor present and continues with it. There's some moments in the show that can actually be serious.

Hazbin? Helluva? SML?

They see raunchy, do the most absurd shit. They sexualize everything or fetishize shit, SML lost ad revenue because of this exact reason. Hazbin has no identity outside the pilot because that's how it's known. Helluva has no personality outside of being recycled 2010s Fujoshi fap material. SML has no personality because it's inconsistent and not scripted. None of these three are to be compared to South Park because the writings catered to adult audiences and not fucking children.

These Stans are the reason we have warning labels on shampoo and the 🔞 label. Ffs.