i havent unl*rried, but also im kinda just. 😐😐 blah about it all. they could be together, i know the evidence for that, but i wont be ignoring the evidence that theyre not. harry is louis’ baby but possible harry was with c*mille. maybe they arent together anymore. i dont care
?!
I mean - what could possibly be the point of this ask
It’s not asking anything
It’s not saying anything that’s relevant to this blog in particular
And it’s interestingly not using Camille and Larrie in full because ... you don’t want people to find this when they search for it :-D
In other words: this anon wants no one interested in Larrie or Harry Styles and Camille Rowe to find this blog, but they want me to publish something that expresses doubt about Larrie.
And that stresses there is evidence against Larrie?
For the odd doubter amongst my readers: the only thing this anon and all the other Hamille anons *right now when Camille’s new film is coming out* do is prove the closeting theory. Harry has never confirmed he was with Camille. He is closeted. The closet comes with bearding and beards are usually in for the publicity it brings them. And this is when we hear about Hamille - on the weekend of her movie coming out... okay then not fishy at all. We are not ignoring ANY evidence. Just qualifying it not as evidence against Larrie but for closeting. All of this, including this transparent ask with asterisks for people believing in Hamille not to find this blog is just more evidence for this being a beard, closeting, and there being a gay guy in that closet.
To the anon: I’ve told you, you’ve come to the wrong blog. Your tactics are transparent. I am not worth your time. Nor are you worth mine. I’ll happily go back to being on your blacklist of blogs not to bother messing with.














