Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic KOTOR I Carth and Bastila Debate Sunry And Principles
seen from China
seen from China

seen from T1

seen from T1

seen from Poland
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from South Korea
seen from China

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
seen from China

seen from T1
seen from Singapore
seen from Netherlands
seen from Argentina
seen from China
Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic KOTOR I Carth and Bastila Debate Sunry And Principles
Huh...somehow I got Sunry acquitted during his murder trial.
I'm honestly not sure how I did that. I don't think I've ever gotten him off completely before.
I didn't even try to get him acquitted, since I found the proof that he is guilty and got him to confess in private. I did what I always do at his trial, which is object to the circumstantial nature of the evidence and expose the way that the Sith are planting evidence to frame him, but not advancing any other explanations or theories. Normally this results in him being convicted, but having the death penalty waived. That's as close to "justice" as we can get in this situation.
I don't know what I did this time to sway the judges in favor of full acquital.
this is my favorite ending to Sunry’s trial just for the sheer comedy. judge asks for your opening statement and you immediately prove your client guilty. and the selkath are like ‘well that’s weird but okay. case closed!’ 30-second Sunry trial speedrun.
there’s also something worth noticing about Bastila and Carth objecting to this outcome, even though it absolutely is the correct justice and you get light side points for it (but not if you’ve seen the recording and still defend Sunry as innocent, you scumbag lawyer). like Carth and Bastila are supposed to be the Light Side Good Guys, but they’re really hypocritical. like Mission also ranks pretty Light Side, but at least she doesn’t pretend that Sunry isn’t guilty.
also the fact that Mission and Canderous are so blasé makes me laugh. what did Taris do to them that they just. give no shits?
Zura: The Last of Kings, Pt. 3
At the bottom of the sea, a powerful entity is bound in chains.
Sunny 이순규 x Henry 유헌화 U & I JYP Party People
Henry & Sunny having the best chemistry at this JYP Party People performance ^_^
I think Sunry's murder trial in Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic is the best example of "moral complexity" in the game, because I honestly don't know the "right" outcome.
For the immediate trial question of "Did Sunry murder Elassa?", the answer is simple: Sunry is guilty. He committed the crime, and in the course of your investigation you can find evidence to prove it and get him to confess in private.
However, despite Sunry's actual guilt, the Sith have still planted evidence and bribed witnesses in an attempt to manipulate the court case. They plan to use the trial to get the Selkath government to side against the Republic. Politics are supposed to stay out of legal proceedings, but it is impossible to deny that this trial will have an immediate effect on the war currently raging across the galaxy.
Elassa, the victim, was a Sith spy who had seduced Sunry with the intent of obtaining secret Republic information. She may have even been planning to kill him that same night. You could hypothetically argue that Sunry killing her was a legitimate part of the war or espionage, and not criminal murder. However in the course of questioning Sunry he admits that he didn't act on orders from the Republic and instead it was out of personal rage and betrayal when he learned that she was using him as an intelligence asset and was not attracted to him like he thought she was.
So, do you allow Sunry to be convicted for the crime he committed, knowing that it may cost thousands of Republic soldiers their lives if the Selkath restrict kolto exports as a result?
Do you get him acquitted to stymie the Sith plot, but allow Elassa's murder to go unpunished?
There isn't a simple answer here and I applaud the game for setting it up this way.
Normally I play the technicality game: I present all of my evidence about the Sith's manipulation of witnesses and evidence and highlight their lack of valid proof of Sunry's guilt, but I don't advance any of Sunry's justifications for his actions or accuse the Sith of killing Elassa themselves. I also do not present my own evidence of Sunry's guilt. I speak only the truth itself, but not the whole truth.
The outcome for my tactics is that Sunry is convicted, but the death penalty as waived and the Republic does not face any censure from the Selkath. However the Sith also do not face any censure. I think this is the closest we get to "justice" in this situation.
Sunry/Zura: The Last of Kings, Pt. 1
[Several weeks ago]
The Western Trident Coast was, of all of The Golden Trident, the most neutral of grounds. And sea.
The merpeople, either indirectly or through their allies, laid claim to the Eastern and Southern Coasts, as well as the Inland of the West and the East. Graves Canyon was an exception in that the merpeople could assert no dominance there. The natural fortifications of the canyon made it hard for even the merpeople’s hobgoblin allies to invade. But it was no matter; Sunry was already dispatching some of the inland scientists to take care of that.
But the merpeople had historically made allowances for the Western Trident Coast. Sunry and his predecessors had commanded their allies not to cause any trouble there that would displease its primary inhabitants. It was home to powerful, ancient creatures whom even King Sunry would not oppose: Zura, the Marid, and Hanzi, the Dragon Turtle.
The merpeople monarchs had come to a centuries-old understanding with Zura and Hanzi that was used to maintain the peace. Zura and Hanzi would deal with trespassers as they pleased, and the merpeople monarchs would command their allies to not trespass on those lands unless they wished to face the consequences. The powers of the marid and the dragon turtle, while not explicitly admitted or yielded to by the merpeople monarchs, were nonetheless tacitly observed as unwise to cross.
That being said, the relationship among the 3 parties was not necessarily one of allyship. Rather, there was a grudging tolerance and truce that was never broken. The parties were never actively desirous of conflict enough to antagonize the others too much, but were not beyond conflict if the tenuous truce was disturbed.
Maintenance of such a truce often required the occasional meeting in neutral territory, at the border between the Western and Southwestern coasts.
Autumn day in Acadia #autumn #acadia #foliage #sunry #mirovrlik #mirovrlikphotography #outdoors #road #visitacadia