Tällee nukun useimmat yöt
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Italy
seen from Japan
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from China
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from China
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
Tällee nukun useimmat yöt
Yes, it turns out it's totally possible to make new black-and-white illustrations and then forget about their existence for a few months. 😂 You shall hear/see more about them assuming I don't forget again. 🙊
I just wanna tell you that your Valvert art is beautiful and so are each one of them. The soft colours and delicate lines are just so fantastic and I'd follow your art to the moon and back. Also, I love your recent mutual activity with @magicfishhookart cause you are both one of my fav artists of this fandom and it's so great to see you working somewhat closely. Have a great day, night, afternoon or whatever time is there where you are living! Keep arting, I'm here for you. :)
This is such a thoughtful and kind comment I'm smiling so much my cheeks hurt nszjnks THANK YOU I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT ELSE TO SAY
Fish is wonderful and one of the many les mis fans that welcomed me with open arms into this amazing fandom💕❤️
シブヤ経済新聞 @shibuyakeizai
“本日から!!#渋谷パルコ の「PARCO MUSEUM TOKYO」で #浅野忠信 さんの個展「FREAK」。 https://shibukei.com/headline/15781/ 大型の作品をはじめとする画業初期の作品から、会場で制作した新作まで。「疑似アトリエ」コーナーなども作っています。 #渋谷 #アート #俳優 #エンタメ @asano_tadanobu @PARCOMUSEUM“ (from shibuyakeizai‘s twitter)
Mulla on uhriki jo valmiina!
näyttelyn suunnittelu tunnilla kuultua
Keskiviikkona yhteisötalo Manskilla pidettävä Symbiogenesis-näyttely tarjoaa tehtävää ja koettavaa koko perheelle yhdeksi illaksi.
I'd like to know if there's any actual difference between being nonbinary and genderqueer? I always thought these two identities were more or less the same, but recently I've learned they are not and I'm confused. Especially so when I read the definitions and see myself as both. I feel no gender and at the same time I display a little bit of both genders and feel a little bit of both, though not any of them at the same time. Is being nonbinary genderqueer valid? Thanks for your time! 😊
For me there is!
Check out this breakdown: The Non-Binary vs. Genderqueer Quandary
To put this complicated issue as simply as possible: non-binary refers to gender that is not binary (not man nor woman) and genderqueer refers to gender that is queer (non-normative). Because gender that is not binary may be regarded as “queer” because it is not normative, it becomes easy to see why these terms have been used interchangeably. However, queer is also often used in a radical or political context, so some who may otherwise have considered themselves genderqueer may feel distanced from the term, or more closely aligned with it, due to this association. In short, genderqueer is often non-binary (except for in the case of referring to expression / performance exclusively), but not all non-binary identified people may consider themselves genderqueer for a variety of reasons, which I will discuss.
I identify as both nonbinary and genderqueer. For me, nonbinary is how I describe my gender. I do not fall within the binary bounds of gender. And genderqueer is how I navigate my gender in this society. It includes how I relate to gender and how I present my gender and deals with the way which I navigate my gender, which is specifically as queer and nonnormative within the bounds of this binary society.
There is definitely a lot of overlap between these terms. Imo, genderqueer is a wider umbrella which can also include nonconforming presentations/ways of navigating gender and not just a specific description of your gender itself.
I also went over this exact question just a few months ago here in this ask, if you want to read my answer then.
~Pluto
So, as far as I get, the arrangement between Aziraphale and Crowley is: if both of them have job to do in the same place, at the same time, it's only one of them that goes there and does both tempting and blessing. Do you happen to remember, if that deal was the same in the book? I can't check it, cause my copy is currently out of my reach, but wasn't that arrangement in the book about going to different places so they could work separately, instead of one-doing-both thing? It puzzles me.
The Arrangement in the book:
The Arrangement was very simple, so simple in fact that it didn't really deserve the capital letter, which it had got for simply being in existence for so long. It was the sort of sensible arrangement that many isolated agents, working in awkward conditions a long way from their superiors, reach with their opposite number when they realize that they have more in common with their immediate opponents than their remote allies. It meant a tacit non-interference in certain of each other's activities. It made certain that while neither really won, also neither really lost, and both were able to demonstrate to their masters the great strides they were making against a cunning and well-informed adversary.
It meant that Crowley had been allowed to develop Manchester, while Aziraphale had a free hand in the whole of Shropshire. Crowley took Glasgow, Aziraphale had Edinburgh (neither claimed any responsibility for Milton Keynes, [Note for Americans and other aliens: Milton Keynes is a new city approximately halfway between London and Birmingham. It was built to be modern, efficient, healthy, and, all in all, a pleasant place to live. Many Britons find this amusing.] but both reported it as a success).
And then, of course, it had seemed even natural that they should, as it were, hold the fort for one another whenever common sense dictated. Both were of angel stock, after all. If one was going to Hull for a quick temptation, it made sense to nip across the city and carry out a standard brief moment of divine ecstasy. It'd get done anyway, and being sensible about it gave everyone more free time and cut down on expenses.
It’s the same in the book, they both do the blessing and the tempting if they are going to the same place (the last paragraph). Plus they don’t sabotage each other’s activites. :)