For the choose violence asks, I choose... #2! (or #24, hard mode no p4 takes)
2. a compelling argument for why your fave would never top or bottom
akechi would never top because the only thing he's ever wanted is to be loved by someone else. he wants to be taken care of and appreciated, and deep down, really wants someone to tell him who to be and what he's worth. if he did top, it would be an act taken out of performance rather than genuine desire.
haha. jk. i don't believe in top/bottom bullshit. akeshu are switches. and so are the vast majority of gay relationships both in real life and in fiction. because sexual positions do not fucking matter and mean absolutely nothing about who you are as a person outside what position you prefer in sex.
(sub/dom are a totally different thing related to kink culture, and i'm really tired of the two being conflated bc it adds so much unnecessary confusion to the conversation. to be clear, sub/dom is cool and valid. it is not the same thing as your position during sex. also, in sub/dom dynamics, akeshu are still switches.)
24. topic that brings up the most rancid discourse
well, well, well. speak of the fucking devil. i can't stand people who think top-bottom dynamics genuinely affect a relationship outside sexual positions. look into the history of that for more than two seconds and you will find that you are steeped in millennia of deep-rooted misogyny and homophobia and you're not getting out of that mess without deconstructing a thing or two. but somehow i'm the bad guy for yucking someone's yum... maybe, if your yum is founded on the idea that being passive is feminine and active is masculine and these roles are rigid, fundamental aspects of a relationship that affect every aspect where one role is the supportive caretaker and the other is the assertive protector, and that the former is always on the receiving side of sex and the latter is always on the giving side of sex, then your yum is actually poisonous bullshit.
sigh. it was a mistake to get a bluesky, maybe.
