Aug 23, 2022
They're a 10, but only because of the reduced probability of ecosystem-based disaster risks compared to those caused by the other categories of 10s.
"Only basing this on the overall environmental impact of various possible applicants is certainly one means of measurement, I suppose."
"Although unless empirical evidence exists to back up this claim, it does little more than act as conjecture, and can easily fall into subjective confirmation-bias on the part of the observer. It is best to maintain a more specific constant to mathematically measure against than have a more nebulous idea of 'disaster risks', for example."
"And I'm an 11, thank you very much."