Did medieval warfare actually see fire arrows being used? What about catapult and trebuchet payloads set on fire?
Yes, but they aren’t as effective as depicted in movies. You specifically need to have a loose bow with a longer than usual arrow, which keeps the fire from burning your bow hand and has the arrow going slow enough so it won’t be extinguished since shooting it too fast will snuff it out. Specially-designed fire arrows were built with a small metal lattice cage which could carry a small piece of coal, which could be used to set thatching alight. Some evidence exists of big, machine-launched crossbow bolts which could carry a flaming payload similar to a cartridge. Javelins could also he used in this fashion, either by tying a torch to it or launched from a spear thrower. You’d have to shoot a bunch of them, because most would gutter out, but if you wanted to start a fire, that’s one way to do so.
Siege weapons could launch burning projectiles, the Mongols were documented to have covered projectiles in pitch and tar and setting it alight. Defenders on castle walls could dump cauldrons of boiling water or heated sand (oil, by contrast, was much rarer because it was so expensive). In naval warfare, merchant ships could use their crane to drop piles of flaming hay on other ships as an improvised weapon.
In my panel “Death of the Other” which I gave at both Ice and Fire Con and Con of Thrones discussed strategies to defeat the Others and a lot of them involved thermal weaponry, because you can’t count on a dragon to save your bacon.
Thanks for the question, Anon.
SomethingLikeALawyer, Hand of the King
















