seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Canada

seen from Spain

seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from Pakistan
seen from Sweden

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
Imagine Warner being obsessed with dressing his daughter up every single day. Like Juliette's just like "Warner why does a two year old need an oversized hat and aviators" and he's just like "shhh. It's the look nowadays, she has to keep up with the latest trends!" And Juliette just rolls her eyes and lets him dress their daughter ridiculously bc at least he isn't fussing over her attire as much as a result.
ok yea but warner dressing their little boy in little suits and styling his hair
After listening to Warner teach her about the ins and outs of fashion for many years, Juliette decides to explore women's fashion a bit more and finds that she actually enjoys it. Not nearly as much as Warner, but she does have a certain appreciation for the way she looks in a nice pair of heels every now and then.
warner being devastated that he’s allowed to have no say in her wedding gown
Hi love! So about the Punnett squares... We would assume that Divergence is recessive. Let's call it d. Non-divergence is therefore D. In the case of Tobias, if Marcus is 100% Divergent, we would set the square up like so: d and d on top. For Evelyn, say she had some divergence, but not enough to be significant. Her pairing would be d and D, set on the side of the squares, respectively. Then... (To be continued, I'm out of characters)...
(Continued) we would solve the Punnett square. So the squares would look like so: dd, dd, dD, dD. if this is the case, we would see that there was a 50% chance that Tobias would end up divergent, and a 50% chance that he wouldn't. So it really could have gone either way, if we assume that these parameters are in fact true.
I’ll take your word for it.