Do you consider yourself a Thomist, or do you align more with the Scotist/Bonaventuran schools of thought?
Hi Anon, and thanks for your question!
I spent 6 years studying almost exclusively Thomistic theology and honestly....I think Thomas is mostly correct in his elaborations/teachings/explanations on the faith but....it’s so dry to me. I’m not a Thomist, I would never consider myself one, but I wouldn’t say I’m a Scotist or a Bonaventuran either. I know very little Scotist thoughts, though what I have read I don’t disagree with. Honestly, I’m just not a systematic theologian by any means. I even had a professor once tell me directly to my face that I’m not and shouldn’t pursue it. I took it personally at the time, but I realized what he was telling me: I’m a pastoral theologian. I don’t like theories and abstracts and exclusively pondering the unattainable divinity, I prefer living in the world and working with real people in every day situations...hence my being a youth minister. Not that there’s anything wrong with being a purely systematic theologian, I’m just not an academic.
Also, if I ever have to read anything from the Summa again, I might hurt someone. I spent two years STRAIGHT reading ONLY the Summa and...honestly I think that’s enough to burn most people out.
Thanks a bunch for your question and I’m so sorry my response has been sooo delayed! God bless you!












