Discover Top Posts Tagged with #tinderreflections

Popular Recent

Blogcast - listen to the audio version I met her on Tinder. We wanted to meet quickly without messaging back and forth for a long time. She

Blogcast - listen to the audio version You know what another turn-off is? Your zodiac sign. Not your particular sign, but the fact that you

Blogcast - listen to the audio version You’ve got a new match 😍😍😍 I’ve read this sentence hundreds of times. Comparatively rarely have I act

Blogcast - listen to the audio version Selina, 41, lives 267 kilometers away. We matched on Tinder six years ago without ever communicating.

Blogcast - listen to the audio version “Are you still searching or are you already living?”, initializes the profile text of Janett, 36. Her

“Are you still searching or are you already living?”, initializes the profile text of Janett, 36. Her passions are Outdoors, Spirituality, Dogs, and Coffee. It seems we matched on Tinder 7 years ago but we never chatted there.

Looking at her profile picture now, it suddenly hits me: we already matched before on some other dating platform. We even went on a spontaneous date. Went for a walk together. I almost forgot. So many years, dates, and names with faces happened since then. I wonder what she's up to now. Let's continue reading her self-description.

Prefers deep talks to superficiality, sporty, self-reflective, open, honest, empathetic, silence, road to awareness, fight the ego, laugh-laugh-laugh, rather book than Netflix. no go's: shyness, "Hello, what's up?", smoking, more than one selfie

Well, that's oddly specific. And hypocritical as well. We both have more than one selfie on our profiles. Whatever. That's the least perplexing thing on the list. I don't remember her being overly into 'deep' talks, neither self-aware nor empathetic. What I do remember is her not understanding me, be it lifestyle, philosophical points of view, or much else. I also remember her criticizing my posture and lack of body tension. Which compliments my view of the basic, ignorant, uneducated, superficial, unempathetic person I felt sorry for back then.

Maybe she changed and is a better person now. Like...a completely different person. Like...performing a 180-degree character turn better than Tony Hawk on a skateboard. Looks like she stopped smoking, too. Good for her.

Fits the narrative.

ChatGPT, round out my short story I decide to message her, despite my doubts and reservations. I want to know if she truly has changed, or if this is just a facade. I ask her if she remembers me, and she responds almost immediately, saying that she does indeed remember me, and that she's sorry if she wasn't the best version of herself back then. She tells me about her journey to self-discovery, and how meditation and spirituality have changed her life. I am skeptical, but also curious. We decide to meet up, and I am surprised to find that she truly has changed. She is more grounded, more understanding, and more empathetic. We have a deep and meaningful conversation, and I realize that I have changed as well. We part ways, but I know that this won't be the last time we see each other. I am grateful for the chance to meet her again, and I am glad that we both took the time to grow and change. I am no longer searching, I am living.

Namaste. 😂

This article is part of my new series, Tinder Reflections. Follow me on Facebook and/or subscribe to my newsletter to get notified when I release the next episode.

Blogcast - listen to the audio version Svenja, 35. Engineer. The oldest entry in my list of matches. Matched on October 3rd of 2014. Matched

Svenja, 35. Engineer. The oldest entry in my list of matches. Matched on October 3rd of 2014. Matched and never messaged. Lives 613 kilometers away now. How come – I’ll never know. She must have been within a radius of 50 kilometers at some point, since that is my maximum distance setting on Tinder. Looks like another interesting life story. Just like these similar examples, to name but a few:

Yiwen, 28, 291 kilometers away. Jana, 41, 719 kilometers away. LisBeth, 41, 256 kilometers away, Mirja, 44, 422 km away.

Each name comes with a face and key data. University, job, place of residence. Self-descriptions range from positive vibes to formal proposals. From insightful to spiteful. People are as different and unique as the sand grains of the Sahara. Nonetheless, I recognize patterns, fight prejudices, stay open-minded while valuing my own time, and get ghosted every once in a while.

But that’s a story for another day. So far, these were only matches with which I never communicated. Looking at some of these nominal matches I wonder. Why? Was I really that desperate? Did I mindlessly auto-swipe right on all profiles, as many men do? I couldn’t have possibly found all of these pictures attractive, let alone those bland profile descriptions, or lack thereof. Whatever. I once read: men tend to select after matching, while women are more selective beforehand. Seems plausible to me. Strange new culture and good old biology.

ChatGPT, “Write an interesting factoid related to my story:”

A factoid related to your story is that according to a study published in the journal “Personality and Individual Differences,” men tend to swipe right more often on dating apps like Tinder, while women are more selective in their swiping. This is often referred to as the “swipe right bias” and may explain why some men have many matches with women they never message.

ChatGPT, explain the possible psychological, cultural, and biological reasons behind “swipe right bias” in more detail

The “swipe right bias” on dating apps like Tinder can be explained by a combination of psychological, cultural, and biological factors.

From a psychological perspective, men may be more likely to engage in “risky” behaviors, including indiscriminately swiping right on dating app profiles, due to a desire for novelty and excitement. Additionally, men may be more likely to engage in what is known as “socially desirable responding,” or the tendency to give responses that are viewed as socially acceptable or desirable, leading them to swipe right more often to increase their chances of matching with someone.

From a cultural perspective, societal expectations and gender norms may play a role in the “swipe right bias.” Men are often socialized to be more assertive and pursue romantic interests, which may lead them to take a more active role in seeking out potential partners on dating apps.

From a biological perspective, men may be more likely to engage in “mate-seeking” behaviors, driven by the evolutionary desire to spread their genetic material and reproduce. This may lead them to be more indiscriminate in their swiping habits, in order to increase the number of potential partners they are exposed to.

It’s also worth noting that while these explanations are general and some may apply more to some individuals than others, not all men engage in this behavior, and not all women are selective before swiping.

Don't miss new episodes of my series "Tinder Reflections". Follow me on Facebook, Tumblr and/or subscribe to my newsletter.

Blogcast - listen to the audio version Eight years is a long time. Relatively speaking. Seemingly enough time for Julia to leave her home, f

My new series "Tinder Reflections" featuring OpenAI's ChatGPT 🤔 … surprisingly deep and insightful. If you want to read the full story and future episodes, follow me on Facebook or check out my blog. Podcast format is available, too.