Thomas Tunguz published a post describing the Forer Effect, which arguably exposes shared fundamentals of motivation and sense of self for a large group of people. This should, as a result, arguably be shaped into all company’s business models and management philosophies- how do you help people, for example, optimize their unused capacity and feel liked/admired.
“In 1948, a psychologist named Bertram Forer offered a group of psychology students a bespoke personality sketch to each student. After interviewing each undergraduate, he provided them with this list:
1. You have a great need for other people to like and admire you.
2. You have a tendency to be critical of yourself.
3. You have a great deal of unused capacity which you have not turned to your advantage.
4. While you have some personality weaknesses, you are generally able to compensate for them.
5. Disciplined and self-controlled outside, you tend to be worrisome and insecure inside.
6. At times you have serious doubts as to whether you have made the right decision or done the right thing.
7. You prefer a certain amount of change and variety and become dissatisfied when hemmed in by restrictions and limitations.
8. You pride yourself as an independent thinker and do not accept others’ statements without satisfactory proof.
9. You have found it unwise to be too frank in revealing yourself to others.
10. At times you are extroverted, affable, sociable, while at other times you are introverted, wary, reserved.
11. Some of your aspirations tend to be pretty unrealistic.
12. Security is one of your major goals in life.
Forer then asked each student to rate the accuracy of the sketch from 1 to 5. In aggregate, the students scored the assessments as 4.3 - highly accurate.
Unbeknownst to the class, Forer had provided the same list of traits to each student. Called the Forer Effect, this test exposed the human cognitive bias that fortune tellers, astrology and personality tests exploit. We will attribute high confidence, uniqueness and fidelity to descriptions of our personalities or personal situations despite their vagueness. These imprecise pronouncements are broad enough to apply to thousands and potentially millions of people.”
