turningmachine replied to your post “I’ve read Learn You a Haskell For Great Good, I’ve read/skimmed a lot...”
Haskell is used in production???????
I mean, I have a phone interview with a Haskell based company on Wednesday, so.
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Australia
seen from Netherlands

seen from United Kingdom
seen from China

seen from Greece
seen from Canada
seen from Greece
seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Greece
seen from China
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from Japan

seen from United States
seen from China
turningmachine replied to your post “I’ve read Learn You a Haskell For Great Good, I’ve read/skimmed a lot...”
Haskell is used in production???????
I mean, I have a phone interview with a Haskell based company on Wednesday, so.
turningmachine replied to your post:What do you think will happen with geopolitics?
also haven’t we been preparing for war with Iran for a while now? (although you could say not meaningfully)
We don’t have staging grounds for a ground invasion. Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan wouldn’t be keen on the idea.
We could fight a tanker war, like we did in the 1980s, or an air war, like we did against Iraq in the 1990s. Presumably we’d do it to enforce a sanctions regime, like the one we had against Iraq. At best, that’d put us back where we started, with a non-proliferation deal like the one we got in 2015, after a decade of sanctions.
I don’t know what the Iran hawks want. I hope they don’t have the damn fool idea that we could leverage air and sea power to get a better non-proliferation deal or -- god forbid -- effect regime change. And I certainly hope they don’t think we could do it unilaterally.
I’d need to know more about Iranian and American military technology than I do to know the feasibility of an air campaign against Iran, especially one that targets Iranian nuclear facilities. Can we reliably identify and eliminate them without unacceptable losses? If the answer yes, then the Iran hawks might just want an endless air war.
What the Iran hawks certainly do want is an endless pseudo-proxy war in Syria, Yemen, and Shiite Lebanon, which seems equally pointless. Why? What are they doing? Who do they think the Iranians are?
But I’ve never read any Iran hawks -- I’m repelled by the idea, which smells of pure Huntingtonian psychosis -- so I have no idea what they’re thinking. Because, really, what are they thinking?
You’re gonna have to check with someone with better ears for this sort of thing.
turningmachine replied to your post “anonymousclone replied to your photo “gininthecampari: I want a...”
do you want them to know what a codensity monad is?
you make an excellent point
turningmachine replied to your post: of course, between c. 1970 and c. 1979, the ICP...
imagine if ICP stood for insane clown posse in this instance
I blame the Insane Clown Posse for the July 1959 massacre in Kirkuk
you are second up against the wall when any of the revolutions come
fun
turningmachine replied to your post: �� EU
what’s the alternative?
debt forgiveness for the periphery and a more dovish central bank, presumably under French/Italian/Spanish leadership
turningmachine replied to your link:Donald Trump, after an intelligence briefing,...
does this mean trump will start attending briefings more frequently?
can we make the president eat his vegetables?
Sam Automation provides the best CNC Turn Mill Machine in India