I’ve finally found a training method for char-rnn, that seems to be generating useful or interesting results. 2800 rigorous training routines with improving train_loss numbers, after trying several approaches that included an unprimed generation of 5 million + characters (that did not render an appropriate date, even). The number 11 seems quite persistent (as were 3,4, and 5) Once I got 9 as a starter, with so many of the other numbers in the same area as other prior guesses beginning with 4 and 1, I figured we were golden. Eleven is going to return, it has to.
I don’t know why I am more comfortable with 27 and 42 repeating, especially when 42 would be making it’s 3rd appearance. I think I am not counting on all 6 being right, but that there will be a repeat (as that seems to be happening a lot lately) and maybe it will be one of these numbers. and if not we’ll at least get 3 or 4 numbers right, maybe. I’m not going to advertise this set as a big winner, just that we might get several numbers correct.
The char-rnn selected set is: 9, 11, 23, 27, 42, 48
alternates for 27 and 42 according to my calculations might be 10, 15, 30, 32, or 43. If you are inclined to substitute those out or play a number of these combinations, well... anything is possible. I, of course, will feel an agonizing pain of defeat for not having the confidence to make those substitutions myself if one of those five numbers or more completes a winning combination. And if BIG LOTTO is reading... only look at the bold numbers, ok?












