More taxonomic vandalism - Van Wallach
Not a dual nomenclature anymore - now a three way nomenclature - Wuster / Britton gang taxonomic vandalism hits a new level in their bid to kill the ICZN and the Code
Dear all,
there has been a lot written about how the Wuster/Britton gang have been creating a toxic dual nomenclature for reptiles, starting of course with their attempt to rename the cobra genus Spracklandus, as Afronaja in 2012 and so far over 130 taxa have now got dual nomenclature thinks to this gang of thieves, child sex offenders and dog fuXXers. So here I now report on the gang's decision to now engage in a three-way nomenclature for taxa. Yes, dual nomenclature may not destroy the ICZN and the code, so the Wuster/Britton gang are now engaged in creating a three way nomenclature. Recall in 2012, Hoser (2012) erected the genus Maxhoserus for the globally distributed Braminy Blind Snake. Being such a prominent taxon, it came as no surprise that the Wuster/Britton gang rushed to name the genus as "Indotyphlops" in 2014, and have plastered their name on all the online dabases since then, knowing full well that their name is an illegally coined junior synonym. Peter Uetz, even DELETED the correct name Maxhoserus from his "The Reptile Database" and the Hoser (2012) paper was also removed from his extensive references list to make sure no one else could find the correct name, Maxhoserus. Not satisfied with creating a complete and utter mess in herpetological nomenclature, The Wuster / Britton gang have now created a third name for the same genus in the form of Virgotyphlops Wallach, 2020 …. or should that be 2021? Wallach published the new name in an online only, not peer reviewed "journal" called "Podarcis" in 2020, but without Zoobank registration. When one or more of the child sex offenders, dog fuckkkers or other members of the The Wuster / Britton gang tapped Van Wallach on the shoulder and alerted him to the fact his name was invalid because it did not have zoobank registration, he republished it in a second paper in 2021, also renouncing his 2020 paper. Problem is that you cannot "unpublish" something. So just to make it clear, the correct name for the genus is Maxhoserus Hoser, 2012 and nothing else. And before someone asks, yes Virgotyphlops Wallach, 2020 is an illegally coined OBJECTIVE SYNONYM of Maxhoserus Hoser, 2012, meaning same type species. And in answer to relevant questions, Adam BRITTON a key member of the Wuster / Britton gang is currently still in jail after pleading guilty to anally raping people's pet dogs that he stole. He is expected to be back out of jail and engaging in more taxonomic vandalism for the Wuster / Britton gang in 2018. It is also true that another member of the gang has been charged with unlawful sex with a 6 year old. To claim this behavior, covered up by the gang of course, has no connection with their taxonomic vandalism and coverups of the correct earlier names as stated by Hinrich KAISER, Scott THOMSON and Mark O'SHEA is false. The activities are of these gang members the same in that they rely on covering up and hiding the truth in a very unscientific way.
All the best
Raymond Hoser
SNAKE MAN
Australia
Original reference
Hoser, Raymond. 2012. A review of the extant Scolecophidians ("Blindsnakes") including the formal naming and diagnosis of new tribes, genera, subgenera, species and subspecies for divergent taxa. Australasian Journal of Herpetology 15: 1-64.
Illegal renamings
Hedges, S.B., Marion, A.B., Lipp, K.M., Marin, J. & Vidal, N. 2014. A taxonomic framework for typhlopid snakes from the Caribbean and other regions (Reptilia, Squamata). Caribbean Herpetology 49: 1–61
Wallach, Van 2020. How to easily identify the flowerpot blindsnake, Indotyphlops braminus (Daudin, 1803), with proposal of a new genus (Serpentes: Typhlopidae). Podarcis 11 (1): 4-12.
WALLACH, VAN. 2021. Addendum to the proposal for a new generic name, Virgotyphlops, for the species Eryx braminus Daudin, 1803 (Serpentes: Typhlopidae). Podarcis n.s.: 12(1): 16–18.