Asking as a vegan myself,
Obviously the goal is ending animal agriculture, but some farmed animals, thinking especially of sheep here, will still require human intervention to be able to live a healthy life. Now I wonder what the preferable path would be beyond assisting them with their needs - stopping them from procreating and letting their populations simply die off over time eventually leading to their extinction, or instead just stopping the procreation of most of them and doing targeted limited breeding with the goal of making these animals able again to thrive without human assistance and eventually letting them do so in vastly smaller and healthier populations, without having them die out completely.
This whole question is extremely hypothetical of course, as the current state of things is still very far from this having any relevance, but nonetheless I am curious what you and your followers might think would be the more desirable path?
This is a really tricky question, and it’s one I’m undecided on myself. I can understand the argument for preserving these animals in small numbers in sanctuaries, either as a conservation project or to educate people on what we did to farmed animals.
However, there is also the fact that farmed animals do not live healthy lives in healthy bodies even when rescued, because of what the animal agriculture industry has done to their species. They aren’t designed to grow old, and suffer a myriad of health issues when they do. They grow too big too quickly, they eat too much, produce too much wool, too many eggs, too much milk when lactating.
An argument can be made that we should breed out those traits, but at that point, what are we actually conserving? What can anyone learn from that? It would be bringing into existence an entirely different species, essentially to serve human interests, and that doesn’t sit right with me. At the same time, I find the idea of these beautiful, intelligent animals simply ceasing to exist profoundly sad. Maybe how we feel about it isn’t particularly relevant, though?
I don’t think we necessarily need a blueprint for exactly what a post-liberation world would look like, and it’s alright that it’s something that would need to be figured out later. I think it’s unlikely that there will ever be a world where no animals are being exploited or killed, and there will always be a need for sanctuaries to take in those animals when they’re rescued, even if they exist in far fewer numbers. That may make this whole issue moot, but it’s still an interesting hypothetical to consider.














