#viloence

[vhscorp]

Certaines paroles sont si violentes qu'elles peuvent tuer tout aussi sûrement qu'un coup de poignard en plein cœur...

V. H. SCORP

[rudrjobdesk]

असलियत बता रहे तो तकलीफ क्यों? नूपुर शर्मा के समर्थन में बोलीं प्रज्ञा ठाकुर

असलियत बता रहे तो तकलीफ क्यों? नूपुर शर्मा के समर्थन में बोलीं प्रज्ञा ठाकुर

Image Source : FILE PHOTO  Pragya Thakur Highlights ‘ज्ञानवापी में भगवान शिव का मंदिर था, है और रहेगा- प्रज्ञा ‘देवी-देवताओं के अपमान को कैसे सहन कर सकते हैं?’ ‘नूपुर के साथ खड़े होने के लिए ठाकुर के खिलाफ कार्रवाई होगी?’ Prophet Row: अपने बयानों को लेकर सुर्खियों में रहने वाली बीजेपी सांसद साध्वी प्रज्ञा सिंह ठाकुर एक बार फिर चर्चा में हैं। इस बार उन्होंने बीजेपी की निलंबित प्रवक्ता नूपुर…

View On WordPress

[africanuniverse]

No Touch Torture

“Gang Stalking” is, very likely, a disinformation term created by

U.S. intelligence agencies. It refers to the intense, long-term, unconstitutional surveillance and harassment of a person who has been designated as a target by someone associated with America’s security industry.

Such operations have nothing to do with criminal gangs. Official domestic counterintelligence operations of this type are – apparently – perpetrated by federal agents and intelligence/security contractors, sometimes with the support of state and local law enforcement personnel. Unofficial operations of this type are, apparently, perpetrated by private investigators and vigilantes – including former agents and cops, some of whom are members of the quasi-governmental Association of Law Enforcement Intelligence Units (LEIU), sometimes on behalf of corporate clients and others with connections to the public and private elements of America’s security industry.

The goal of such operations – in the parlance of counterintelligence agents – is “disruption” of the life of an individual deemed to be an enemy (or potential enemy) of clients or members of the security state. Arguably, the most accurate term for this form of harassment would be “counterintelligence stalking.” Agents of communist East Germany’s Stasi (state police) referred to the process as Zersetzung (German for “decomposition” or “corrosion” – a reference to the severe psychological, social, and financial effects upon the victim). American and British victims have described the process as “no-touch torture” – a phrase which also captures the nature of the crime: cowardly, unethical (and often illegal), but difficult to prove legally because it generates minimal forensic evidence.

Tactics include – but are not limited to – slander, blacklisting, “mobbing” (intense, organized harassment in the workplace), “black bag jobs” (residential break-ins), abusive phone calls, computer hacking, framing, threats, blackmail, vandalism, “street theater” (staged physical and verbal interactions with minions of the people who orchestrate the stalking), harassment by noises, and other forms of bullying.

Both the facts and the geographical distribution of relevant published news reports – as well as other evidence cited on this website – suggest that such stalking is sanctioned (and in some cases, orchestrated) by federal agencies; however, news reports, credible anecdotal information, and my own experiences, indicate that 

"such stalking is also sometimes used unofficially for personal and corporate vendettas by current and former corrupt employees of law enforcement and intelligence agencies, private investigators, and their clients."

Since counterintelligence stalking goes far beyond surveillance – into the realm of psychological terrorism, it is essentially a form of extrajudicial punishment. As such, the harassment is illegal – even when done by the government. It clearly violates, for example, the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unwarranted searches, and the Sixth Amendment – which guarantees the right to a trial. Such operations also violate similar fundamental rights defined by state constitutions. Stalking is also specifically prohibited by the criminal codes of every state in America.

Crimes against Americans at the hands of corrupt government agents and private security thugs have a long history in the U.S. The FBI’s COINTELPRO (“Counterintelligence Program”) scandal in the 1970s was the most notorious high-profile example, but similar abuses of power by “Red Squads” (state and local Law Enforcement Intelligence Units) and private detectives date back to the 19th century.

[tis-i-cthulhu]

Why you cannot eat tomato and cucumber at the same time

tbh i really thought he was going to say because a cucumber looks like a dick and thats gay

[cameracap]

when will people come to understand. do not like a fucking art post if you arent going to reblog it. it makes me want to kill you dead

[tomub]

« Il y a trois sortes de violence. La première, mère de toutes les autres, est la violence institutionnelle, celle qui légalise et perpétue les dominations, les oppressions et les exploitations, celle qui écrase et lamine des millions d’hommes dans ses rouages silencieux et bien huilés.

La seconde est la violence révolutionnaire, qui naît de la volonté d’abolir la première.

La troisième est la violence répressive, qui a pour objet d’étouffer la seconde en se faisant l’auxiliaire et la complice de la première violence, celle qui engendre toutes les autres.

Il n’y a pas de pire hypocrisie de n’appeler violence que la seconde, en feignant d’oublier la première, qui la fait naître, et la troisième qui la tue. »

Dom Helder.

[davidsamd]

Mystery about faith! #syria #syrian #war #syriawarcrimes #pray #prayforsyria #stop #humanity #child #syrianchildren #syriankillings #little #god #crime #viloence

[tsparks]

The Intimate Life of Violence Brad Evans interviews Elaine Scarry

Via: LA Review of Books

On 9/11, on a single morning, the population collectively witnessed the fact that the Pentagon could not defend the Pentagon, let alone the rest of the country. This stunning revelation might have led to a widespread debate about our capacity for defense and the way our military is trained for overseas wars of aggression but not for protection of the United States home ground (as I argued in Who Defended The Country?and later in Rule of Law, Misrule of Men). Instead of examining our defense and changing it, we quickly rebuilt the same Pentagon and switched to a shorthand form of demonstrating our prowess, namely torturing people at Abu Ghraib and alternative dark sites. Other severe moral and legal prohibitions — such as the Army, Navy, and Air Force handbook prohibitions on misusing the white flag and Red Cross, as well as the prohibitions on assassination — were abrogated by the United States during our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in this same period.

The deeper the crisis of doubt and the higher the danger is that a country will rely on a grotesque mimesis of power such as torture or nuclear weapons. That’s why when I see President Trump mocked and exposed for his untruths, I feel fear. His untruths should be rigorously and continually challenged and exposed, but the liberal press seems to have concluded — and perhaps they are not wrong — that this can only be done by every day humiliating him, every day scorning him. But this may put people elsewhere in the world in danger because constant belittlement may reinforce our president’s own inclinations, acknowledged during the election campaign, to use magnified forms of compensatory power. When Nixon boasted, “I can go into my office and pick up the telephone, and in 25 minutes 70 million people will be dead,” it is not coincidental that he was in the midst of an impeachment proceeding — that is, he was in the midst of being divested of legitimate forms of authority.

LINK