Apr 20
i think claiming that endogenic plurality and traumagenic plurality are separate mechanisms is kinda a silly thing to claim without evidence.
i think they're the same mechanism used in different ways (like how people can hallucinate from medications and mental illness but also induce them through choice and willpower, it's part of how tulpamancy works), unless you have proof that they're actually two separate phenomena in the brain, in which case: PLEASE for the love of GOD show any proof we're lacking in that research department comparing the experiences and if you have some i'd love to read it
#syscourse#i should be doing productive things#utilizing the new opportunities i've been given in life and such#but no im reading syscourse again#mostly posting so that certain people might give me more sources#although i highly doubt it#also theres so many pro-willo and anti-willo blogs#why are there so many of you#my blog isnt original and it isn't even that cool a username or theme#why are so many teenagers copying me???#like being anti endo is a fun new trend you can slap a character onto#i made this username to make fun of someone who was pro ai and claiming to be “anti willo pro endo”#im pro willo miku because im ACTUALLY pro endo#which includes willogenic systems#i love willogenic systems they are my siblings (metaphorically)#same with all plurals and systems and multiples#also otherkin and fictionkin and some other forms of alterhumanity#i should stop ranting in the tags before i hit the tag limit. might have already done that already but oh well.