I’m not sure if a writer can begin a story and know the character(s) completely. The writer can certainly have the concept of who he/she(character) will be, though, I think as a story progresses, the characters progress as well. The palpability of a character lies within emotion. If the writer can transcend the characters emotions onto the reader, then I think that’s what makes the character more plausible. I personally be of the opinion that a universal character is a character that can react anyway, and is not confined to any certain situation or event. A character that can be: serious, outgoing, happy, mad, strong, weak, or fundamentally anything, has a noteworthy ability. Once that character has possessed that personality or emotion, and can make the reader feel the same way, I feel is success on the writers part. It’s incredible, when a character has struggled and overcome the difficulty or problem, and makes the reader feel strong as well. That’s a very significant element of story. It’s subliminal that the writer is not telling the reader to feel a certain emotion, but has conveyed his idea through emotion by means of characters in the story and made the reader feel that way regardless.