#xjanex

[scrapmetaleater]

how it feels reading the body without organs section of anti-oedipus over and over again for an hour and a half and still not getting it

[scrapmetaleater]

step aside mishima, dying for a supreme, higher cause/ideal is neat and all but dying for a cause that was doomed from the start is even more beautiful cuz it has more tragic irony and reaches a more sublime beauty than a death for a victorious cause ever could. victory is for the moral humans, crushing ironic loss is for the intimate lovers.

[scrapmetaleater]

unironic trvth nvke

[scrapmetaleater]

the difference between eugenics and transhumanism is that transhumanism seeks to ascend the human as a whole while eugenics remains enslaved to humanity

[scrapmetaleater]

i wish i was a 14 year old girl so i could flirt with rappers ion fw so that i could get them cancelled

[scrapmetaleater]

A Great Many Faces

The angels appear to me Their eyes rest on me before darting away like Black crows on branches Off to scavenge the battlefield Their gaze meets mine, and our eyes chat about this and that Til they tell me why we met up like this My judgement stands undecided A great many faces look upon me Shekhinah, Gevurah, Chesed, and for a glimpse, Keter And the angels all worry for me A great blooming appears before my eyes I ride these waves, you see Their lows and their highs Shaking, bellowing, drifting, catching wind I dream of lives before me And ahead me, sun blinding I thought how beautiful it must be To surrender oneself to the void To sacrifice my death unto the NothingBeast To fall in love with my killer And to let it fuck me, make me theirs, submit myself to it With such a passion Eros himself blossomed up between our hips

[scrapmetaleater]

early mao was so goated but once he got a taste of state power he turned his back on communism bring back nietzschean anarchist guerilla warfare fighting mao bro

[scrapmetaleater]

A Frankly Unneeded Defense On The Inevitability of Revolution For People Who Don’t Know Much About The Communist Programme

Firstly, the organization of labor, the mode of production, of society is a way in which society reproduces itself. It is not all of society, as in it is not the totality of culture and social relations, but it is only through flows and intensities of labor and only through the mode of production that society able to exist, and as such, in the infinite rhizomatic web of causes and effects that shape society, it is given strong importance. Capitalism here will be used to describe a society wherein capital is the only way in which labor is expressed, capital itself will be used to refer to the market place and the wage-labor/commodity production system, and capitalist will be used to refer to people who are engaged in the selling of commodities (something to be exchanged using money, whether it be good or service) in order to create profit.

Capital functions at its most basic level by exploitation, it sustains itself through the M-C-M’ circuit wherein money is traded for a commodity and then sold for a greater amount of money at a higher price, the difference in money is taken as profit and becomes reinvested into the market place once more. Wage labor emerges in an attempt to maximize profit, wherein a wage laborer sells their labor-power (their capacity/ability to work) as a commodity to a capitalist so that the capitalist may use the wage laborer’s labor and production of things in order to sell them at a higher price than what the wage laborer is paid, producing greater profit and a surplus of value to be fed back into the feedback loop of the M-C-M' circuit.

Capitalist society functions through 3 syntheses: productive (labor), disjunctive (recording), and consumptive. The socius here refers to capital, as within capitalism, capital acts as transcendental. All labor must be recorded upon capital and the market place, there exists no labor allowed to be independent of the market place, at least not for long and not until capital finds a way to consume and exploit it. To contrast, in previous feudal societies, the production of commodities had not totally inserted itself into the mode of production. Instead, the feudal peasantry worked the lands for themselves, strictly producing what they would use, in addition to the things they produced in order to be sold on the market place or sent off to a monarch. There existed both production-for-use and commodity production then. Under capitalism, capital and commodity production act as the sole way in which labor can be expressed, all labor is inscribed upon the recording surface of society that is capital. As such, commodities appear as though it is capital that produced, miraculously appearing upon capital, upon which the space of your stores and market place inhabit. This is a mystical appearing, as it seemingly comes from nowhere, for the labor-power and the fruits of labor produced by the laborer are seperated from them, alienated from them. Finally, there exists the consumptive synthesis. Here, commodities are bought in order to ensure survival, though distorted in order to force the consumer into buying more than the socially necessary labor time (aka the effort and time used to produce the commodity) required in order to produce the commodity. Through this, the subject is created/sustained through the taking in of inputs/energy/resources, and the system defaults back on the already established organization of labor inscribed/ingrained/recorded upon the socius, capital, starting the process of production/inscription/consumption all over again.

Here, we can see the contradictions apparent in and internal to capital. Capital operates based on the mediation between producers and consumers. Production and consumption become separated and alienated from one another in service of profit and capital, producing contradictions through imbalances. The wage laborer produces extra, surplus value that becomes siphoned away towards capital, the consumer is forced to wade through a sea of commodities that are priced at far more than the labor-time necessary to make it. Obviously, I don't think I need to inform you of how capitalism creates suffering, a 3 year old could do that. But what should be clarified is that these contradictions, internal to the system of capital, are a product of the fundamental basis by which capital functions. Capital can only function if there are contradictions, if the wage-laborer is in distress, and if the potential for a new, better world looms over and crashes into society. As the machinic circuitry of capital persists, as more and more profit is extracted, the machines enter a state of breakdown, struggling against the potential for change, progression, and evolution. There exists in capitalism, from the internal contradictions within capital, a constant tendency to degenerate towards the more efficient mode of production.

While the logical end point of this tendency can be delayed through ideological dissemination of propaganda by the state apparatus (the tool by which one class dominates over another and capitalism regulates and controls itself), imperialist wars started in order to kickstart production into overdrive due to a mass wasting of resources through war, and the relocation of extreme labor exploitation to countries in the global south that are purposefully underdeveloped, the contradictions and the breaking down of capitalist circuits and the brushing up against the potential for revolution and a more efficient mode of production is not just inherent to capitalism but it is required in order for capitalism to function. Thus, revolution is inevitable, although the actual success of revolution is up to what people desire (and people’s desires quite frequently go against them). Regardless, the job of the communist movement is not to mediate class conflict and reduce it or reduce suffering through activism or reform, but to push for this degenerative tendency of class antagonism further and to take advantage of the breaking point in order to immediately establish that new, more efficient mode of production. Any notion of a gradual transition from capitalism to communism is temporal mediation of class antagonism, what is required is a fundamental break and shift in the mode of production, one that turns all social relations into communist social relations, transforming everyday life.

The more efficient mode of production is of course communism, wherein producers and consumers become one, without a capitalist class and without the mediation between production and consumption by capital. There will be no distinction between the ones who do labor and the ones who don't, there will be no need to sell labor power, everything will be free and unmediated by money, and human flourishing will blossom to the maximum, unfettered and liberated from class. The laborer will own themselves to the fullest extent, all the outputs (things produced) of the communist system and organization of labor will become directly invested back into the laborer, becoming the new inputs. The self as a fragmented mosaic of varying opposing drives will achieve a pure immanence and a self recognition with itself as a fragmented mosaic of varying opposing drives.