hello?

💫Queer💫24💫 i do art sometimes https://www.inprnt.com/gallery/wormfood/

[tastywormfood]

Got a really bad cavity and had to go to the emergency dentist who did a really really poor job... Basically threw €200 our the window, so here i am! Hoping to earn at last 50% back✊😔

So i have 10 commission slots open to anyone interested! Any extra character will be 50% of the price on top✨

This is my first time doing commissions, so please be kind to me, im learning as i go💖

[tastywormfood]

I was really looking forward to Gabrielles gender crisis:( the scene in the book where she cuts her hair off, and when its grown out the next morning she has a full on panic attack. In the book she start wearing mens clothing literally immediately. I dont understand why they changed that.

[tastywormfood]

Who up devilling their minion‼️ idk if i'll have time to finish it since I'll be travelling for 3 weeks from tomorrow, but I like it so far

[tastywormfood]

Lestat eps 3: Don't worship that grave dug on ur own, don't burn alone.

Lestat eps 4 to Armand: Aaactually go kill urself.

[nozaeron]

a friendless bottom twink sociopath is a beautiful name for a girl

[tastywormfood]

So what it looks like from all the posts I've seen is that Armand is on an apology tour and no one is forgiving him😭😭😭

[tastywormfood]

His old Pinterest under the same SoundCloud name had kkk inspo 😭 it’s worst than I thought

Omg what? What was the name?

[tastywormfood]

he followed two n*zi accounts, sunnyhol*caust and t-union. he liked other songs with n*zi material and one with a cover with a white child in black face. one of his mutuals abat promoted racist, r*pers and abusers on his IG account. lowkey, we all moving on. he’s not the same person anymore.

Whaaaat, how long ago was it?

[tastywormfood]

Wait whats going on with the Connor Storrie situation? Something about a song? I'm lost

[tastywormfood]

Since the phannouncement is on fathers day, im guessing the surprise is their finally adopting us all

[tastywormfood]

Dan and Phil i need to make dinner, please just rip the plaster off and get this over with so I can eat my summer rolls in peace

[tastywormfood]

I genuinely do like Butterscotch Bitch, but why the fuck do they have to use the word TOESIES

[hinasho]

I really don’t understand why there’s still this notion that Louis described Lestat as nothing but a rampaging, maliciously evil monster in S1. I just do not understand it.

Actually watching Season 1, Louis told their history with an abundance of nuance. Everytime Daniel tries to interject with an insult or more negative view of Lestat’s actions, Louis rushes to defend him, even to the point of downplaying if not actively refusing to acknowledge the abuse he experienced. Even before watching S2 with just S1’s version of events alone, it’s so clear that Lestat is complex and Louis desperately wanted to make that known.

So I really just don’t understand why so many people still say that Louis’ retelling about their relationship was one dimensional. Louis repeatedly emphasizes that Lestat was loving and sweet and supportive and caring just as much as he was selfish and cruel and violent and degrading. He talked about Lestat with all these complexities!

It really feels like the only reason people keep saying Louis’ portrayal made him “too monstrous and evil” is just because they don’t want Lestat to have flaws at all. They claim to love him for being complex, but then get so angry whenever he’s depicted as having actual flaws. Flaws that are a problem and aren’t just “he cries too much and loves too deeply”

Was Louis’ perspective of everything before 2x08 through the lens of believing Lestat murdered Claudia? Yes, and his thoughts on certain events would likely be different after learning the truth. But this idea that whenever Louis mentioned any of Lestat’s crueler moments in S1, he was just lying to intentionally frame Lestat as super mega evil? That Louis erased all of Lestat’s more positive & gentler qualities?? It feels insane to me given how hard Louis fought against that exact portrayal.

[bequietimsodizzy]

i hope connor wins and then they'll both have awards and then they can make the awards kiss

[nyangibun]

What it boils down to for me is that they would rather judge a photo of a 17-year-old biracial kid with a hate symbol drawn on him in a small predominantly white town, versus the 25-year-old man who shows up to "stop anti-Asian hate" and BLM marches, loudly hates AI, likes posts about anti-fascism, reads books about the immigrant experience, writes and directs short films about queer relationships and identity, and watches poignant movies about the human experience from diverse directors. That is the person they want to cancel. They don't care who he is now because it was never about morality. It was always about their dislike of him as a person, as a person of colour, as a man in a loving relationship with a woman, and someone with intellectual ambition.

They hate Hudson because Hudson makes them feel small and insignificant. They hate Hudson because he shouldn't be more popular than his white co-stars. They hate Hudson because he doesn't adhere to their conventions of attractiveness, aka white. I mean, it shouldn't surprise you that the majority, if not all, of his haters stan only white men. I don't include kpop stans because they are some of the worst perpetrators of anti-Asian rhetoric, they just don't realise it.

So, they can keep doing this but I'm still going to stand with the 25-year-old Hudson of today.

Hell, I'd stand with 17-year-old Hudson and tell him, it'll be okay.

Because unless you've been the only minority in a mostly white group/town, you have no idea how much you put up with and smile through. Even at 19-20, I put up with so much because it was easier than fighting every single person. No, even at 24, I stayed silent when my family were being racially profiled on a train full of white people in the middle of Europe because it was safer not to make a fuss and get off the train. Anyone who can't see the nuance in that is either wilfully ignorant of experiences outside of their own or has incredibly white privilege.

[tastywormfood]

Thought this take was good

[cens105]

Fighting pitchforks with facts: Hudson Williams edition

I see so much misinformation going around, and because as a lawyer by training, I'm a strong believer of facts, I decided to record everything that is FACTUAL about the Hudson Williams incident.

What is the discourse about?

On 6th June 2026, an anonymous Twitter account (@truthsosad - deleted by now) posted a picture from 2018, where a highschooler Hudson Williams, surrounded by 4 white teenagers (presumably schoolmates) was photographed in a completely scribbled over clothes, face and body, including an upside down cross and an incorrectly drawn swastika on his head. The other teenager on that picture do not have the same hate symbol, but do also have doodles. The 4 girls are smiling, Hudson isn't.

What is the context of the picture?

Several accounts (including a mom and one of the teachers from the school) confirm that the picture was taken during an end-of-year graffiti party, where underage teens of the two final years went drinking outside and doodled on each other clothes, faces and body. Several accounts confirm that it would not be unusual for some edgy or vile pictures being drawn, often as a prank without the other kids' knowledge.

Where did the picture come from?

The photo could be linked back to a publicly accessible VSCO (photo editor) account of a private citizen from Hudson's hometown that was linked to her bio on her instagram account. She had no other pictures of Hudson on her vsco, so presumably not a close friend, but rather a more distant school mate. She was one of the girls on the controversial photo. It is unlikely that she leaked the picture. Most likely it was found by a group of stalkers who combed through all of the publicly accessible posts/photos of people in Hudson's school and hometown to look for dirt. Either she was alerted quickly to the circulation of the picture or Hudson's PR team reached out, because the picture was deleted within a few hours. By today (9 June), the entire VSCO was unlinked from the profile.

Who spread the picture?

Anonymous accounts on X spread the picture, publicly boasting that their aim was to end Hudson's career and push him to self-harm. Burner accounts also appeared to other apps, including Tumblr, where these accounts published the picture to spread it in the tags. In a few hours, the picture broke containment and was published

Why did they do this?

This was a fairly blatant organized attack against Hudson to try to harm his career and mental health. Some anonymous accounts even wished him lethal self harm. Another group called for his removal from Heated Rivarly and demanded Shane to be recast. The endgame of the group is not clear - likely the goal was to taint his public image. Since there are many inf;uential Jewish people in the film industry, a controversy like this can have an impact on his career long term.

Did Hudson make any statements?

No, neither Hudson, nor his team released any official statements as of writing this. "An anonymous friend / sources close to Hudson" (likely someone from the PR team) provided the following quote:

Do we know if it is the truth?

From the context, it is very likely that this statement is the truth: 1. it was doodled by someone else (the placement high in his forehead would make it hard to draw it on himself) and 2. Hudson did not know what was on his face until the next morning (high on his forehead he can't see it, unless there were mirrors at the campout). He probably also had no idea of that picture existing.

It's also possible that if it was a prank, nobody told him what was on his face.

Could there be other explanations?

Sure. It's possible that it was a dare, a lost bet, a punishment game, a prank with Hudson's knowledge or even a hate crime against him. In previous interviews Hudson did talk about how trying to fit in as a teenager was hard. Other POCs living in white majority rural areas shared their experiences of the pressure of having to accept racist jokes to try to fit in. But so far, there is no evidence whatsoever that the source in TMZ is lying.

I heard there was "AIDS" written on him?

There is a writing on his neck that could spell "AIDS" - it's not clear from the picture. Other teens pictures that resurfaced from the same party did have "AIDS" written on them. Some people speculate that it could simply be a nickname for Aidan, as most of the doodles are kids' names. Again, no context, if there was any kind of homophobic intent, or if Hudson even knew it. It's another doodle that's in a place he can't see.

I heard he had a second picture the following year with the same symbol?

False. The following year has a picture of Hudson with only a cross on his forehead, and with the caption "The nicest person ever".

What about the pool picture?

The pool picture of a group of teenagers including Hudson was published as "evidence" that Hudson did have white friends, presumably to refute the narrative that the symbol could have been bullying or hate crime against him. Of course, having a picture with friends is not proof that someone was never bullied. The two things can easily coexist, and these were clearly different events and different groups of peers. Also, please don't post half naked pictures taken from private accounts.

Did Crave, the Heated Rivalry crew /cast or sponsors make any statements?

No. There are no statements of support or condemnation. The Canadian Screen Awards posted a new video of him giving his speech to Sophie's award on Instagram. This could be taken as a small show of support.

But didn't Peloton pull his ads?

Peloton made his ad private, likely due to the contract length and not as a specific response to this incident.

Is there any indication that Hudson is or ever was a Nazi?

Duh. No. Even the accounts spreading the pictures don't believe that. Hudson is on record defending all kinds of minority groups and having left-leaning politics from well before he was cast in Heated Rivarly. The anti accounts also don't argue on his beliefs, an argument they would lose, but rather gaslight Hudson fans that they are bad people for "excusing" him.

He's a grown man. He should have known better. Why should we afford him any grace?

There is a rule in law called "innocent until proven guilty", because we as a society believe that it is more harmful to the overall good to hurt an innocent person, than maybe let a guilty person "get away with something". Sadly, in the public opinion, this rarely works. Rumours spread faster than facts, reputational damage can be done quickly. This is the mass psychology that this stalker group exploits.

I leave this write-up here, because I believe this is an issue we need to focus on more:

THIS IS A HATE CAMPAIGN.

There is no evidence that Hudson Williams has done anything wrong and in fact, very well could have been an actual victim of bullying or a hate crime at the time that picture was taken. In the present, he is very clearly a victim of a targeted hate campaign. Of course, basic human decency requires that we stand with someone being subjected to organized online violence, where the goal is simply to destroy his reputation.

Are there any good sources out there?

Paris Match article

Queerty article

What can I do?

Engage with positivity. Stick to facts. Remind people that anonymous stalkers running a hate campaign are the real culprits here.