Tereza

[terezabg]

The Principle of Local Independence

The framers of the Bulgarian Constitution did not stop at simply declaring the independence of the communes; they also made it clear that the central government should not interfere in local affairs. They believed that true local self-government could only exist if the communes were free from direct control by central authorities.

For this reason, the central government was forbidden to appoint agents or maintain officials who might interfere in the daily administration of the communes. The only government representatives allowed within the higher administrative divisions—such as districts and departments—were those dealing with matters of national importance, including police, justice, finance, and customs.

This system created a strong foundation for local democracy, ensuring that citizens had direct control over their own communities while still remaining part of a unified state Customized Guided Tour.

The Commune Foundation of the State

The commune was considered the basic unit of the Bulgarian State and enjoyed complete autonomy, unlike any similar institution in other countries of the time. Each district was divided into communes, which could be urban or rural, depending on their population and structure.

The commune functioned as a corporate body, meaning it had legal personality and could manage its own affairs. Every Bulgarian citizen was required by law to belong to a commune and be registered in its official records. The laws of the country did not allow vagrancy, ensuring that every individual had a defined place in the local community.

Election of the Municipal Council

Each commune had a Municipal Council, which was responsible for local administration and decision-making. The members of this council were elected by universal suffrage, following the same rules and safeguards used in the election of the National Assembly.

Eligible voters included all adult citizens of the commune who possessed full civil and political rights. However, several groups were excluded from voting or holding office. These included:

Persons convicted of hard labour or awaiting trial,

Tenants of disreputable houses,

Beggars,

Non-Christian gypsies, and

Members of the army and police forces.

These restrictions were designed to preserve the integrity and moral standing of the local administration.

The Bulgarian system of local government reflected a deep respect for individual responsibility and community autonomy. By limiting the involvement of the central government and empowering the communes, Bulgaria created a strong and democratic foundation that encouraged civic participation, accountability, and local initiative.

[terezabg]

The Feudal System in Bulgaria

Royal Power and Titles

Under the feudal system, the real authority of the king became weaker, but his titles and symbols of power grew in dignity. The king was addressed as “Caesar” or “Imperator,” showing his prestige in both local and international affairs. He sent and received ambassadors, wore a purple mantle and a crown, and carried a sceptre as symbols of sovereignty.

The succession to the throne followed the law of primogeniture, which meant that the eldest son inherited the crown. Women were excluded by the Salic Law, so only men could rule. If the king had no children, the throne passed to his eldest brother. During the minority of a king, the queen mother acted as regent. If a royal family line became extinct, the noblemen (boliars) had the authority to elect one of their peers as the new ruler, thus establishing a new dynasty Istanbul Daily Tour.

Nobility and Byzantine Influence

The boliars held all important state functions, making the political system an exclusive privilege of the nobility. The entire administration of the kingdom was modelled on the Byzantine Empire, which served as a cultural and political example.

Among the highest state dignitaries were:

The despot, usually a close relative of the king.

The sebastocrat, often the king’s brother.

Other officials such as the chamberlain, the minister of finance, and several dignitaries responsible for different state services.

Each province was governed by a prefect, or “ban,” who acted as the king’s representative and exercised both administrative and judicial authority.

Social Classes

Society under feudal Bulgaria was divided into three main classes:

The nobility and the clergy – who held power, land, and privileges.

Tradesmen and artisans – who lived mainly in towns and engaged in commerce or crafts.

The peasants (often referred to as pariahs) – who formed the largest part of the population.

Peasants were allowed to own land, but they were bound to it and could not freely leave. They were obliged to pay taxes and provide services to the upper classes, which kept them in a state of dependency.

The feudal system in Bulgaria reflected both local traditions and Byzantine influence. While the king’s symbolic authority remained strong, real power lay in the hands of the boliars. The division of society into nobles, tradesmen, and peasants created a rigid structure, with the majority of people tied to the land and heavily taxed. This system ensured stability for the ruling elite but limited freedom for ordinary people, shaping the social and political life of medieval Bulgaria.

[terezabg]

The Central Stara Planina

Landscape and Peaks

The central section of the Stara Planina is also bounded by peaks on the north side. Its southern slopes descend steeply into the level plains, creating a sharp contrast in the landscape. From this part of the range, travelers can enjoy views of the highest peaks of the Stara Planina.

Several summits rise above 2,000 metres. Among them, the Yumrukchal (Botev Peak) stands at 2,372 metres, making it the tallest in this section.

Mountain Passes

Surprisingly, despite its great height, the central part of the Stara Planina contains some of the best mountain passes. The Araba Konak and Hainboaz (Pass of the Republic) are each less than 1,000 metres high, making them relatively easy to cross Sightseeing Turkey.

Other passes are higher, ranging between 1,300 and 1,700 metres, but they are still more accessible than might be expected. This is because the mountains here are narrower, and the surrounding plains gradually penetrate into the heart of the range.

The most famous route is the Shipka Pass (1,260 m). It has great historical importance, especially during the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–1878, when fierce battles for Bulgarian liberation were fought there.

The Eastern Stara Planina

Structure and Features

The eastern section of the Stara Planina is very different from the central and western parts. Here, the mountains are lower and less rugged. The geological folds are more superficial, and as a result, there are no very high peaks or ancient rock formations.

Instead, the range is divided into several longitudinal chains, shaped partly by the proximity of the Black Sea. Although the area does not have great summits, its structure makes it less accessible.

The Sredna Gora Mountains

Connection with Other Ranges

Running parallel to the Stara Planina to the south is the Sredna Gora mountain chain. Like the Stara Planina, it gradually decreases in height toward the east.

At the western end, the Ihtiman Mountain forms a kind of nucleus that links together the Rila, the Rhodopes, the Stara Planina, and the Sredna Gora. It also separates the river basins of the Iskar and the Maritsa.

Peaks and Valleys

The valley of the Strema River divides the Sredna Gora into two distinct sections:

The Sredna Gora proper – high, thickly forested, and picturesque

The Karadja Dagh (Roebuck Mountain) – lower but equally significant

The highest summit of the chain is Great Bogdan Peak (1,574 m).

Fertile Plains

Between the Stara Planina and the Sredna Gora lie some of Bulgaria’s most fertile plains, such as:

Zlatitsa

Karlovo

Kazanlak (famous for its production of rose oil)

Sliven

To the south, between the Rhodopes and the Sredna Gora, extends the wide and fertile Maritsa Plain, one of Bulgaria’s richest agricultural regions.

The central and eastern Stara Planina and the Sredna Gora mountains form an important part of Bulgaria’s natural geography. They provide not only dramatic landscapes and strategic passes but also fertile valleys that have supported Bulgarian culture, agriculture, and history for centuries.

[terezabg]

Escape from the Tower of Anemas

Bajazet’s Advice

After Emperor John V Palaiologos and his sons were imprisoned in the Tower of Anemas by Andronicus, the rebel prince faced a difficult choice. His ally, Sultan Bajazet, advised him to secure his power by executing the captives. Such an act, Bajazet argued, would remove any chance of their return and prevent a threat to Andronicus’s claim to the throne.

However, Andronicus refused. Cruelty of that level was a step too far, even for a rebellious son. He chose instead to keep them alive in the tower, though still as prisoners. For two years the situation remained unchanged, with the emperor and his sons locked away, waiting for an opportunity.

Different Stories of the Escape

Eventually, the captives managed to escape, but how they did so remains a mystery. Historians of the time give several conflicting accounts.

Phrantzes, a Byzantine chronicler, claimed that the prisoners tricked their Bulgarian guards and walked free through deception.

Ducas, another historian, attributed the escape to the cunning of a man named Angelus, nicknamed Diabolus or Diabol-angelus. Ducas admitted, however, that he could not decide whether their release came from angelic power or satanic trickery Rose Festival Tour.

Chalcocondylas offered yet another explanation: the captives broke through the dungeon walls with an iron tool secretly provided by the servant who delivered their food.

Each version highlights the desperation and determination of the prisoners, though the exact truth remains uncertain.

Venetian Attempts at Rescue

Meanwhile, the Venetians were also involved in efforts to free the emperor. According to Venetian sources, Carlo Zen, a commander, tried twice to rescue John V. These rescue missions were tied to political bargaining: Venice demanded control of the island of Tenedos in return for their help, which would cancel the earlier concession of the island to the Genoese.

Both attempts failed. The first was unsuccessful because the emperor reportedly refused to leave the tower without his sons. The second failed when the plot was discovered before it could be carried out.

Return to Power

Despite these failures, the prisoners eventually escaped. Once free, John V Palaiologos and his son Manuel went straight to the court of Sultan Bajazet. They convinced him to support their cause against Andronicus. With the Sultan’s backing, Andronicus was forced to give up the throne he had seized.

The Tower as a Symbol of Decline

The story of this episode shows how the Tower of Anemas was not merely a prison of stone, but a symbol of the empire’s weakness. Civil wars, betrayals within the royal family, religious disputes, and dependence on foreign powers all reveal the slow decline of the Byzantine Empire.

The tower witnessed not only human suffering but also the empire’s inability to stand united. It became a stage where the tragedy of Byzantium played out, until the empire itself was finally overtaken by its enemies.

[terezabg]

Bosnian Merchants Calm and Respectful Sellers

Unlike the French and Italian shopkeepers, who often eagerly encourage people to buy, Bosnian merchants take a different approach. They do not pressure customers or show strong emotion. Instead, they offer their goods with quiet dignity and politeness, often seeming indifferent to whether or not a sale is made.

They never shout, use big gestures, or behave in a pushy way. This calm behavior is influenced by their Turkish neighbors, who follow the teaching of the Prophet Muhammad:

“Be moderate in your steps and lower your voice.”

Pride and Patience in Daily Life

You will also never see a Muslim begging on the streets of Sarajevo. Complaining is rare. One of the most admirable qualities of the local people is how they handle misfortune and disappointment—with calmness and quiet strength Sofia Sightseeing.

Their attitude can be summed up in a simple belief:

“If you have food, eat. If you don’t have food, then die.” While it may sound harsh, it shows their deep faith, self-control, and pride in not asking for help or showing weakness.

Whether in their shops or their places of worship, many Muslim Bosnians stay composed, respectful, and deeply connected to their religion.

Traditional Guilds Organize the Trades

Like medieval Europe, trades in Bosnia are organized by guilds. Each trade or profession has its own guild, which governs many aspects of the business. These guilds:

Choose a patron saint, Elect leaders and officers, Set prices for goods and services, Regulate wages, Appoint apprentices, Settle disputes

Each type of trade also has its own area in the city. For example, blacksmiths, jewelers, or weavers each have their specific streets or districts. Interestingly, even though merchants may be competitors, they usually maintain friendly and respectful relationships with one another.

The Kiraet-Han A Gathering Place for All

At the center of the old city is a famous meeting place: a traditional coffee house called the Kiraet-Han. This is where many skilled workers and merchants gather. It’s a peaceful and lively place where people from all races and backgrounds can be seen relaxing, talking, and sharing ideas.

The Grand Mosque and a Lesson in Cleanliness

Not far from the Kiraet-Han is the Begova Djamia, one of the largest and most beautiful mosques in Europe, second only to Hagia Sophia in Istanbul and the Selimiye Mosque in Edirne (Adrianople).

In its courtyard, there is a fountain where worshippers wash their hands before prayer. In Islam, cleanliness is essential, and the Prophet declared:

“Cleanliness is the key to prayer.”

Also in the courtyard is a stone measuring stick, the official standard of length—just like a yardstick. If a merchant’s measurements are questioned, he must compare his product against this official standard to prove its accuracy. This simple but strict practice ensures honesty and fairness in trade.

[terezabg]

Bulgaria Gains Limited Independence

After the end of the Russo-Turkish War (1877–1878), the Great Powers of Europe met in Berlin to decide the future of the Balkan countries. At the Congress of Berlin, they told the people of Bulgaria that they could manage their own government and choose their own king. However, this independence came with conditions.

Although Bulgaria was now mostly self-governing, it still had to pay an annual tribute to the Ottoman Sultan, instead of the taxes the Sultan used to collect directly. The amount of this payment was never clearly decided, and the financial relationship between the two nations became confusing and disorganized. To this day, it remains unclear, and an international commission may be needed in the future to settle the issue Local Ephesus Tour Guides.

Unclear Financial Obligations

Bulgaria was also made responsible for a part of the Turkish national debt, but just like the tribute payments, the exact share Bulgaria had to pay was never determined properly. This added more confusion to the already complicated financial relationship between the two countries.

Russian Supervision and Election Issues

Once the Great Powers had set the conditions, elections were organized in Bulgaria. These elections were supervised by Russian troops, who were present at voting stations. Unfortunately, their presence was not neutral. The Russian soldiers tried to influence voters through intimidation, persuasion, and empty promises. Their actions led to a vote that was not entirely free or fair.

A Strange and Confusing Constitution

At the same time, a new constitution was written by a clever Russian politician. The constitution was approved by the people, but most Bulgarians did not understand it. In fact, many experts believe that even today, no one fully understands the document. It was written in a vague and ambiguous way, possibly on purpose, to allow for flexibility and manipulation by those in power.

Prince Alexander of Battenberg Becomes Ruler

After much discussion and correspondence, the Bulgarian National Assembly finally selected Prince Alexander of Battenberg as their ruler. He was only 24 years old at the time and was serving as a lieutenant in the German army, under his great-uncle, Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany.

Prince Alexander had family ties to many of Europe’s royal houses. He was the nephew of the Russian Czar, and his brother, Prince Henry, was married to Queen Victoria’s daughter, Beatrice. Because of these family connections, many believed Alexander would be a neutral and fair ruler.

He was also well-liked by many. Known for his friendly personality, bravery, and honesty, Prince Alexander won the respect of both his people and European leaders.

[terezabg]

The Social and Economic Role of Construction Materials in Roman Asia

Not Carved in Stone The Impact of Material Choices

In Roman Asia, many public buildings were not funded by the government but instead by private donors. These wealthy individuals paid for the construction of important buildings to improve their social status and gain respect in the community. Public buildings, or private structures that allowed access to high-ranking citizens, served as a symbol of power and prestige Sofia City Tour.

These projects did more than just change how the city looked. They had a strong economic impact. Many people worked on these buildings, from laborers and craftsmen to suppliers and decorators. The construction work provided income to the local population and influenced the city’s economic activities.

Cost-Saving Methods with Decorative Facades

One important technique used during this period was revetment. This means builders used cheaper materials like rubble, brick, or stone in the inner structure and covered them with a thin layer of expensive decoration, like marble or carved stone.

This allowed donors to save money by using affordable resources from nearby areas or those that were easier to collect and transport. Even though the building looked rich and grand from the outside, the hidden materials helped keep costs low.

However, using less labor-intensive materials reduced the total construction time, which in turn reduced the number of workdays. This may have meant less income for workers, creating economic disadvantages for laborers who depended on longer construction periods.

Analyzing the Impact on Society

Using calculation methods first developed by Janet Delaine, this study looks at how different materials (stone, brick, rubble) impacted local societies. The use of cheaper construction methods allowed donors to show off their generosity while spending less money, but it may also have limited the economic benefits for those who worked on these projects.

The Water Storage Systems of Byzantine Constantinople

Design and Construction of the Byzantine Cisterns

Constantinople, the capital of the Byzantine Empire, was located on a peninsula with few natural water sources. To solve this problem, the city developed a complex system of aqueducts and cisterns.

As early as the 2nd century, long-distance water supply lines were built to meet the needs of the earlier city of Byzantion. When Constantinople became the capital in the 4th century, water was brought from Thrace using the Valens Aqueduct, an impressive engineering feat.

Building and Expanding the Cistern Network

This water was stored inside the city in large open-air reservoirs and underground cisterns. Starting from the 5th and 6th centuries, more and more subterranean cisterns were built. These usually had two or four rows of columns supporting the roofs.

These cisterns were carefully planned and built with strong architectural techniques. They provided a reliable water source in case of siege or drought and became an essential part of the city’s infrastructure.

The Most Common Byzantine Building Type

Over the centuries, these cisterns were constructed regularly as the city expanded. Today, they represent the most common type of surviving Byzantine building in Istanbul. Their practical design and durability make them an outstanding example of Byzantine engineering.

[terezabg]

Modern History of Bulgaria 1877–1946

1877–1878 Liberation from the Ottoman Empire

The Russo-Turkish War of 1877–1878 ended with Bulgaria’s liberation from nearly 500 years of Ottoman rule. Russian troops helped the Bulgarians win their freedom, with major battles taking place across the country.

March 1878 The Treaty of San Stefano

After the war, the Treaty of San Stefano was signed between Russia and the Ottoman Empire. It created a large Bulgarian state that included most of Macedonia and Thrace. However, Britain and France believed this new Bulgaria would be controlled by Russia. Because of this, they refused to support the treaty.

July 1878 The Congress of Berlin

Soon after, the Congress of Berlin changed the agreement. Bulgaria was split into three parts:

The Principality of Bulgaria, with its capital in Sofia, became mostly independent Customized Tour Bulgaria.

Eastern Rumelia, a separate province, remained under Ottoman control but had its own local government.

Macedonia was returned to direct Ottoman rule.

1879–1908 Building a New State

In 1879, a German aristocrat named Alexander of Battenberg became the first prince of the new Bulgarian state. In 1885, the people of Eastern Rumelia declared a union with Bulgaria, strengthening the country. Two years later, in 1887, Prince Ferdinand of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha replaced Alexander after a coup.

In 1908, Ferdinand declared full independence from the Ottoman Empire. He also proclaimed Bulgaria a kingdom and took the title Tsar (King).

1912–1913 The Balkan Wars

Bulgaria joined Serbia and Greece to fight the Ottoman Empire during the First Balkan War. Together, they defeated the Ottomans and pushed them out of Macedonia and Thrace. But soon after, the former allies turned against Bulgaria in the Second Balkan War, seizing land Bulgaria had hoped to keep. Bulgaria lost large parts of Macedonia to Serbia and Greece.

1915–1918 World War I

During World War I, Bulgaria sided with Germany and Austria-Hungary. It hoped to regain lost territories. However, a Serbian, French, and British attack in Macedonia led to Bulgaria’s defeat. In 1918, Tsar Ferdinand abdicated, and his son, Boris III, became king.

1919–1930s Political Turmoil

In 1919, the Peasant Party, led by Aleksandar Stamboliyski, won elections and promised big changes. But in 1923, he was murdered by far-right forces. After that, Bulgaria was ruled by several authoritarian governments with little public support.

1941–1944 World War II and Soviet Invasion

In 1941, Bulgaria joined Nazi Germany in World War II. In 1943, Tsar Boris III died, and his son Simeon II, only six years old, became king. In September 1944, the Soviet Red Army invaded Bulgaria, and the Fatherland Front, supported by the USSR, took power.

1946 End of the Monarchy

In September 1946, Bulgaria was declared a People’s Republic. The monarchy was abolished, and Communist rule began. In October 1946, Georgi Dimitrov, a long-time communist leader, became Prime Minister. He introduced major economic changes and started the oppression of political opponents, marking the start of communist rule in Bulgaria.

[terezabg]

Justice Was Overshadowed by Power and Lies

The idea of justice was pushed aside by the ambitions of the Great Powers and a campaign of lies spread during Bulgaria’s time of isolation. At that time, Bulgaria had no way to communicate its side to Western Europe.

A War for Freedom Became a War for Control

The war began as a fight to free oppressed people, but it changed into a war of conquest when Romania joined in—even though Romania had done nothing to help in the early fight for liberation Guided Turkey Tours .

Bulgarians Suffer Under New Oppression

A large part of the Bulgarian people, who had once been promised freedom from Turkish rule, were placed back under foreign control by the Treaty of Berlin. Even worse, after being free from Turkish rule since 1878, some Bulgarians were handed over to Romania, which ruled them with even more harshness and lack of sympathy than the Turks.

Lies That Misled Europe

In 1913, many false stories were told about Bulgaria, and these lies seriously influenced European opinion. Fortunately, the Carnegie Commission later reviewed the situation and exposed the truth in a fair and unbiased way.

The Treaty of Bucharest Must Be Fixed

If the Balkans are ever to have lasting peace, the unfair terms of the Treaty of Bucharest must be corrected. And the sooner this happens, the better.

Even today, Romania, Greece, and Serbia are using the same dishonest tactics they used during the Balkan War to mislead the world once again.

A Personal Appeal for Fairness

I have spent ten years living and working among the Bulgarian people. During that time, I came to not only admire them, but to truly care for and love them.

So now, I am sharing these facts with you—facts that I hope will help you understand how much Bulgaria has done for its people, especially in Turkish lands, ever since the founding of the Bulgarian Exarchate, in the forty years before the 1912–13 war.

[terezabg]

Communist Repression of Religion in Bulgaria

The Deadly Attack on Sveta Nedelya Cathedral

One of the most shocking examples of the Communist Party’s attitude toward religion happened on 16 April 1925. On that day, a bomb exploded inside Sveta Nedelya Cathedral in Sofia. The cathedral was packed with people attending a funeral service. The explosion killed 213 people and injured over 500 men, women, and children. It was a brutal act carried out by communists to eliminate members of the Bulgarian government and military leadership.

Religious Leaders Executed After the Communist Coup

After the communist coup on 9 September 1944, the new regime began a violent purge of anyone considered a threat—including religious leaders. Many priests were killed without trial, simply for preaching or performing religious services. More than 100 Christian Orthodox priests were executed during these early days Istanbul Day Trip.

Other religious figures also fell victim to the regime’s persecution. Among the murdered were: Rabbi Isaac B. Levi (Jewish) Muslim cleric Mohamed Rashidov Armenian-Gregorian priest Garabed S. Karadzhiyan Protestant pastor Stephan Todorov Their only crime was being faithful to their beliefs and traditions.

The Religion Act of 1949

On 16 February 1949, the Communist government passed a new Religion Act, modeled after Soviet laws. This Act placed strict control over all religious organizations. It included:

Banning religious services outside church buildings Confiscating church property Prohibiting religious education and activities

Even private individuals were punished for their faith. Students were expelled from school for attending church services. Government employees risked losing their jobs if they were seen in a church.

The Trial of Protestant Pastors

From 25 February to 9 March 1949, the regime conducted a staged trial against 15 Protestant pastors. The charges were false, and the trial was heavily publicized to scare others. Four of the pastors were sentenced to life in prison, even though they had committed no real crimes.

Execution of Catholic Clergy

On 11 November 1952, at 11:30 PM, four Catholic religious leaders were executed by firing squad in Sofia Central Prison. Those killed were:

Father Kamen Vichev Father Pavel Dzhidzhov Father Yosafat Shishkov Bishop Evgeni Bosilkov, a Bulgarian Passionist and Catholic bishop

They had all been sentenced to death in unfair trials. Their executions shocked the international community and remain a tragic moment in Bulgarian religious history.

Forced Name Changes for Muslims

In 1984, the Bulgarian Communist Party began a forced assimilation campaign targeting Bulgarian Muslims. The government forced Muslim citizens to change their names to Slavic ones, erasing their religious and cultural identity. This campaign caused deep pain and resentment among Muslim communities.

Religious Leaders Turned Into Informants

Alongside public repression, the Bulgarian secret police worked behind the scenes. They pressured and sometimes blackmailed religious leaders into becoming informers. These clergy members were forced to report on their fellow believers, creating an atmosphere of fear and mistrust within religious communities.

Under the communist regime, freedom of religion in Bulgaria was almost completely destroyed. Religious leaders were persecuted, imprisoned, or executed. Believers were silenced and humiliated. Churches were stripped of their property, and religious practices were driven underground. The government’s goal was not just to control religion, but to erase it from Bulgarian life. Despite these efforts, many people quietly kept their faith alive, showing incredible courage in the face of fear.

[terezabg]

Socialist Ideas and Women’s Liberation in Bulgaria

By the late 1880s and early 1890s, socialist ideas had spread to Bulgaria. Bulgarian socialists, like others around the world, were among the first to support the cause of women’s liberation.

Socialist Influence on Women’s Rights

The Marxist-socialist ideas about women’s rights were widely spread through socialist newspapers and magazines, such as Suvremenen Pokazatel (Contemporary Barometer), Novo Vreme (New Times), and the women’s socialist journal Zhenski trud (Women’s Labor). These publications played a big role in pushing for women’s emancipation.

Socialists vs. Feminists

From the start of the Bulgarian Women’s Union in 1901, socialists were critical of feminists, calling them “bourgeois” (wealthy and upper-class). They followed the ideas of the Second International Working Men’s Association, which believed that women from different social classes could not unite for a common cause. According to socialist beliefs, women’s rights could only be achieved after the success of the socialist revolution Travel Bulgaria.

Separation of Socialist Women from the Women’s Union

Although Vela Blagoeva (1858-1921) and other women socialists initially joined the Bulgarian Women’s Union, they later followed the party line. They began criticizing feminists, accusing them of being “separatists.” In 1903, socialist women broke away from the Women’s Union because they did not agree with its stance of ignoring class differences. This split had already happened earlier that year in the male socialist movement.

Vela Blagoeva’s Role in Women’s Socialist Movement

Later, Vela Blagoeva created a journal called Zhenski Trud and worked on building a social-democratic women’s organization. In early 1905, she formed the first educational social-democratic group for women workers in Sofia. She also organized the first conference for socialist women in August 1905. This caused a big debate in socialist publications. Some believed it was a separatist women’s organization that could create division in the workers’ movement.

Socialist Divide on Women’s Rights

There were two main groups of socialists: the “narrow” socialists, led by Dimitar Blagoev (Vela Blagoeva’s husband), who opposed the idea of a neutral women’s union, and the “broad” socialists, who were in favor of creating an independent women’s organization. The attempt to form a separate women’s social-democratic group failed at the time, but it encouraged the Bulgarian Women’s Union to work harder at uniting all women activists in the country.

The Founding of Women’s Socialist Clubs

In August 1914, Vela Blagoeva led the Founding Conference of Women’s Socialist Clubs in Bulgaria, following instructions from the Central Committee of the Bulgarian Workers Social-Democratic Party. This group, led by Tina Kirkova (1914-1923), worked to create a unified women’s socialist movement in Bulgaria.

[terezabg]

Socialist Ideas and Women’s Liberation in Bulgaria

By the late 1880s and early 1890s, socialist ideas had spread to Bulgaria. Bulgarian socialists, like others around the world, were among the first to support the cause of women’s liberation.

Socialist Influence on Women’s Rights

The Marxist-socialist ideas about women’s rights were widely spread through socialist newspapers and magazines, such as Suvremenen Pokazatel (Contemporary Barometer), Novo Vreme (New Times), and the women’s socialist journal Zhenski trud (Women’s Labor). These publications played a big role in pushing for women’s emancipation.

Socialists vs. Feminists

From the start of the Bulgarian Women’s Union in 1901, socialists were critical of feminists, calling them “bourgeois” (wealthy and upper-class). They followed the ideas of the Second International Working Men’s Association, which believed that women from different social classes could not unite for a common cause. According to socialist beliefs, women’s rights could only be achieved after the success of the socialist revolution Travel Bulgaria.

Separation of Socialist Women from the Women’s Union

Although Vela Blagoeva (1858-1921) and other women socialists initially joined the Bulgarian Women’s Union, they later followed the party line. They began criticizing feminists, accusing them of being “separatists.” In 1903, socialist women broke away from the Women’s Union because they did not agree with its stance of ignoring class differences. This split had already happened earlier that year in the male socialist movement.

Vela Blagoeva’s Role in Women’s Socialist Movement

Later, Vela Blagoeva created a journal called Zhenski Trud and worked on building a social-democratic women’s organization. In early 1905, she formed the first educational social-democratic group for women workers in Sofia. She also organized the first conference for socialist women in August 1905. This caused a big debate in socialist publications. Some believed it was a separatist women’s organization that could create division in the workers’ movement.

Socialist Divide on Women’s Rights

There were two main groups of socialists: the “narrow” socialists, led by Dimitar Blagoev (Vela Blagoeva’s husband), who opposed the idea of a neutral women’s union, and the “broad” socialists, who were in favor of creating an independent women’s organization. The attempt to form a separate women’s social-democratic group failed at the time, but it encouraged the Bulgarian Women’s Union to work harder at uniting all women activists in the country.

The Founding of Women’s Socialist Clubs

In August 1914, Vela Blagoeva led the Founding Conference of Women’s Socialist Clubs in Bulgaria, following instructions from the Central Committee of the Bulgarian Workers Social-Democratic Party. This group, led by Tina Kirkova (1914-1923), worked to create a unified women’s socialist movement in Bulgaria.

[terezabg]

Misconceptions About Bulgaria

Many people in Britain mistakenly believe that Bulgaria is a wild and barbarous land. However, this belief is far from the truth. Bulgaria is just as safe as England, and the Bulgarian people like to think of themselves as trying to follow England’s example in many ways.

A Glimpse of Old Bulgaria

Tirnova: The Ancient Capital Tirnova, the ancient capital of Bulgaria, is a city with a unique charm. The name “Tirnova” means “the thorn,” and the city is shaped like a thorn, sitting on a rock above the Yantra River. It has long been a symbol of Bulgaria’s strength and history, causing both admiration and challenges for Europe.

A City Away From the Tourist Path

Tirnova is not a place visited by many tourists. It hasn’t been influenced by the modern, stucco-style buildings found in Sofia. Instead, it represents old Bulgaria—picturesque, romantic, and peaceful. The city is located to the north of the Balkan Mountains, surrounded by natural beauty. The landscape around it is rugged, with hills and the Yantra River making a curved path at the city’s base Holiday Bulgaria.

A City Like Edinburgh

If you can imagine Edinburgh Castle, but ten times bigger, built on a giant rock, with parts of the town hanging off the rock’s edge, you would have an idea of what Tirnova looks like.

First Impressions of Tirnova

I first saw Tirnova in the early morning, surrounded by mist and the glow of a beautiful sunrise. The view looked like a scene from an old medieval play, with misty trails along the river and tall pine trees growing on steep slopes. Above, the town seemed to spill over the rocks, a mix of white buildings with bright yellow shutters and vines climbing up the walls. The sky above was a pure, clear blue, with no clouds to interrupt the view.

[terezabg]

Staying by the Lake

Our house was located by the lakeside. It had a balcony covered with vines, and we ate our meals there on the two nights we stayed. As we sat, smoked, and looked out at the lake under the full moon, we agreed that the setting felt more like Italy than anything we expected in Macedonia.

The Medieval Town of Ochrida

From a distance, Ochrida looks like a medieval town, like those shown in old pictures. It has strong walls surrounding the houses, which are tightly packed together inside. However, outside the walls, the area looks deserted. On one side, the wall has fallen away, and the town has spread down to the edge of the lake. The town is messy and disorganized, and at night, it feels dark and mysterious, perfect for a story of pirates or hiding assassins Istanbul Tour Guides.

A City of Intrigue

Ochrida is a place full of intrigue. Greeks and Bulgarians are always plotting against each other, lying about everything, and the Turkish ruler gets no gratitude from either side.

The Old Castle

Above the town, on the rocks, are the remains of an old castle. Its walls are fifteen feet thick, but now they are broken and in ruins. The Romans were certainly here, and I found some Roman ruins, but the castle likely saw its busiest days during the time of the Servian Empire.

Turkish Soldiers in the Fortress

Inside the castle, a group of dirty Turkish soldiers were camped. Their tents were filthy, worse than those of a gypsy camp. They looked as though they never washed. Their clothes were greasy and torn, and their boots were falling apart. I spoke with them, and they told me that their pay was one medjedeh a month. They hadn’t been paid for six months, and over the four years of their service, their pay had fallen twenty months behind.

[terezabg]

The Governor’s Decision

The Governor finally gave in. A representative of the British Government, who had been pretending to be just a tourist, could not be allowed to walk while his escort was on horseback. He quickly arranged for a man who owned horses, and within ten minutes, a deal was made. The horse owner was very nervous and afraid. He worried about the brigands capturing him and his horses, especially the Bulgarian revolutionaries.

Journey Across the Land

We traveled through a rough, barren landscape, with small, twisted oak trees everywhere. The ground dipped and rose, and although the view changed, it always looked the same. It was as though a powerful heat had burned everything away, leaving nothing behind. We crossed dry riverbeds, with no water in sight. The only signs of life were large tortoises moving slowly along the ground. We crossed a wide, dry river, the Koyundara Natural History Museum.

Different Villages

We came across peasants wearing black fezzes. These were Turks of Bulgarian origin, and they spoke a mix of Greek—a leftover from the time of Byzantine rule. All the Bulgarians in this area spoke Greek. Some villages in the region were Bulgarian and Christian, while others were Turkish and Muslim. The Christian villages were generally cleaner than the Muslim ones.

[terezabg]

The Border Cooperation Between Bulgaria and East Germany

Agreement on Cooperation

In 1988, a new agreement was signed between the Bulgarian Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of State Security of the German Democratic Republic (GDR). This was based on a previous Cooperation Agreement established on November 26, 1974. Bulgarian Interior Minister Stoyanov and GDR Minister Erich Fritz Emil Mielke formalized this new agreement for cooperation and collaboration between their respective security agencies for the period of 1988 to 1993.

Joint Activities and Surveillance

As part of their ongoing partnership, a plan was created for joint activities between the Bulgarian State Security’s Department Six and the GDR’s Chief Directorate Two for the years 1984 to 1986. This plan aimed to strengthen efforts against Bulgarian citizens who had escaped to the West, as well as to monitor their relatives still in Bulgaria.

One significant report from February 24, 1953, highlighted the harsh measures to be taken against families of those who fled. It stated that:

Relatives of traitors who were not involved in legal proceedings and were able to work would be sent to the labor camp at Belene Private Balkan Tours.

All property owned by these relatives would be confiscated.

They would be held responsible for their remaining possessions, including livestock. Children aged 14 to 18 would be sent to Labor Schools operated by the Ministry of the Interior, with some reformatories designated for this purpose.

Younger children, aged 7 to 14, would be placed in special schools under the Ministry of Education.

Military and Intelligence Operations

The collaboration also involved military and intelligence operations along the Bulgarian borders. Both nations worked together to gather information about political emigration, monitoring citizens who attempted to leave. This joint effort was aimed at suppressing dissent and preventing any opposition to the communist regimes in both countries.

The Role of Stasi

The Stasi, East Germany’s secret police, provided valuable information to the Bulgarian State Security. This included intelligence about political émigrés and their activities abroad. Such collaboration ensured that both nations could effectively control their citizens and maintain the authoritarian status quo.

The partnership between Bulgarian State Security and the Stasi exemplified the extensive measures taken by Eastern Bloc countries to enforce their borders and suppress dissent. By sharing intelligence and coordinating efforts, these regimes sought to eliminate any potential threats to their power. The policies regarding the families of defectors demonstrate the harsh realities faced by those who dared to oppose the regime. Ultimately, these actions reflect a broader strategy of fear and control that characterized life under communist rule in Eastern Europe.

[terezabg]

The Border Cooperation Between Bulgaria and East Germany

Agreement on Cooperation

In 1988, a new agreement was signed between the Bulgarian Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of State Security of the German Democratic Republic (GDR). This was based on a previous Cooperation Agreement established on November 26, 1974. Bulgarian Interior Minister Stoyanov and GDR Minister Erich Fritz Emil Mielke formalized this new agreement for cooperation and collaboration between their respective security agencies for the period of 1988 to 1993.

Joint Activities and Surveillance

As part of their ongoing partnership, a plan was created for joint activities between the Bulgarian State Security’s Department Six and the GDR’s Chief Directorate Two for the years 1984 to 1986. This plan aimed to strengthen efforts against Bulgarian citizens who had escaped to the West, as well as to monitor their relatives still in Bulgaria.

One significant report from February 24, 1953, highlighted the harsh measures to be taken against families of those who fled. It stated that:

Relatives of traitors who were not involved in legal proceedings and were able to work would be sent to the labor camp at Belene Private Balkan Tours.

All property owned by these relatives would be confiscated.

They would be held responsible for their remaining possessions, including livestock. Children aged 14 to 18 would be sent to Labor Schools operated by the Ministry of the Interior, with some reformatories designated for this purpose.

Younger children, aged 7 to 14, would be placed in special schools under the Ministry of Education.

Military and Intelligence Operations

The collaboration also involved military and intelligence operations along the Bulgarian borders. Both nations worked together to gather information about political emigration, monitoring citizens who attempted to leave. This joint effort was aimed at suppressing dissent and preventing any opposition to the communist regimes in both countries.

The Role of Stasi

The Stasi, East Germany’s secret police, provided valuable information to the Bulgarian State Security. This included intelligence about political émigrés and their activities abroad. Such collaboration ensured that both nations could effectively control their citizens and maintain the authoritarian status quo.

The partnership between Bulgarian State Security and the Stasi exemplified the extensive measures taken by Eastern Bloc countries to enforce their borders and suppress dissent. By sharing intelligence and coordinating efforts, these regimes sought to eliminate any potential threats to their power. The policies regarding the families of defectors demonstrate the harsh realities faced by those who dared to oppose the regime. Ultimately, these actions reflect a broader strategy of fear and control that characterized life under communist rule in Eastern Europe.