not to be vampires posting on main but fuck, this series has such interesting portrayals of consent, lack of consent and victimhood
by episode 4 we know that Owen and Scott, both of the starting vamps, have been turned consensually. they chose vampirism over their previous life, and clearly see it as a blessing or a gift
but everyone that's been turned during the series was turned violently or through coercion. Owen and Scott believe that what's best for them is best for everyone, and in following that they violate the boundaries and consent of everyone around them
the respect of consent that was afforded to them they did not afford to others, and you can see it reflecting a sort of privilege and power imbalance they have in regards to the fledglings
take that scene of Owen talking with Legs in ep 3, and him speaking for all of them when he says they don't want a cure
Pyro is fascinating, because he's almost at the epicenter of all these themes. he was turned without consent, violated, but he was also someone that helped perpetuate the cycle with the turning of Shelby
how the abused become the abusers and so forth
but Pyro and Shelby illustrate another idea reflected in the story: the concept of the perfect victim
we see this with a lot of the humans, but most prominently with Avid. even when he wants to believe that some of the vampires are good, his thinking is still extremely binary
Shelby is 'one of the good ones', and Pyro is lumped in with Scott and Owen as 'the evil monstrous vampires', even though he has also been turned only a short while ago
pretty much everyone seems to forget that Pyro is a victim too, that he was turned nonconsensually, and as much as he managed to roll with the punches he still didn't ask for this
but he's not the perfect victim, like Shelby who's not hurt a human. he lashed out, and did some bad stuff along with the elder vampires, and in doing so he became both the attacker (particularly with Shelby) and the victim
does he not deserve to be saved because he's imperfect, because he lashed out?
does he deserve to be labelled a monster and killed for being put into a bad situation and making bad choices in return?
Avid believes Pyro is unsalvageable and inherently a monster, and refuses to think otherwise
but Pyro doesn't want to hurt humans, he's just trying to scare them away in ep4, and he's open to the idea of accepting help, out of all people
he's used to being called a monster, so he leaned into it, but he does not want to hurt anyone, not really
does he not deserve to be saved? do you have to be the perfect victim to deserve help?
which is why Legs, who truly understands the nuances of the fact that vampires are just people and not a monolith, is so important to this discussion
he sees the victimhood in people like Pyro and even Owen, who are not perfect victims, and yet in his eyes still deserve help
but for most of the humans that complexity is too hard to take into account when these 'monsters' present an active threat to their lives