Monterey Bay Aquarium

shark vs the universe
🪼
d e v o n
Keni
No title available
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
RMH

tannertan36
almost home

Game Changer & Make Some Noise

oozey mess
No title available
Cosimo Galluzzi
noise dept.
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Mike Driver
sheepfilms
The Bowery Presents
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

seen from United States

seen from Mexico
seen from Iraq
seen from Taiwan
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia

seen from Colombia
seen from Venezuela

seen from United States
seen from Bulgaria

seen from Denmark
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States
@theroadtoelection-blog
Anderhalf uur puur genieten! Honderd keer leuker en informatiever dan dat lauwe debat tussen Romney en Obama afgelopen woensdag.
Met minder dan 40 dagen te gaan tot de verkiezingen op 6 november, vindt morgen het eerste Presidentsdebat plaats. Waar staan Barack Obama en Mitt Romney als het gaat om de hoofdissues? Een overzicht:
Laat ons maar lekker polderen
Wat duidelijk wordt, is niet zozeer of de Democraten of de Republikeinen het bij het rechte eind hebben, maar dat – zoals dat ook in de Nederlandse politiek gaat – beide partijen een heel ander idee hebben van de effecten van verschillende maatschappelijke processen.
Waar de een gelooft dat armoede veroorzaakt wordt door een sterke overheid, omdat deze de verantwoordelijkheid wegneemt bij burgers en de gemeenschap, is de ander ervan overtuigd dat juist alleen een sterke overheid armoede kan tegengaan.
In zijn boek beschuldigt Romney Obama van een gebrek aan geloof in zogenaamd ‘American Exceptionalism’, het idee dat Amerika een unieke rol speelt in het wereldwijd verspreiden van vrijheid en democratie. Volgens Romney is de wereld een veiligere plek als de Verenigde Staten de dienst uitmaken.
Obama’s veronderstelde ongeloof in dit gegeven werkt volgens Romney als een selffulfilling prophecy en zal de VS als supermacht uiteindelijk ten onder doen gaan. Met alle gevolgen van dien. Het defensiebudget moet weer omhoog en deals sluiten met Rusland is uit den boze.
Obama daarentegen gelooft dat samenwerking met andere landen essentieel is voor het creëren van een veiligere wereld. Met alleen een indrukwekkend leger kom je er niet.
Het probleem is niet dat de Democraten en Republikeinen het zo sterk met elkaar oneens zijn noch dat ze een totaal ander begrip van de werkelijkheid hebben. Het probleem is dat ze er niet over praten. Niet op staatsniveau en niet op burgerniveau.
David en Glenda uit Atlanta zijn zelfbenoemde socialisten, maar vrijwel al hun vrienden zijn Republikeinse suburbians. Ze praten niet over politiek. Dat leidt alleen maar tot ruzie.
Ook Green Party stemmer Norman uit Washington erkent dat hij me bewondert om het feit dat ik daadwerkelijk met Republikeinen in gesprek ga: “we can only make fun of them”. Samen met zijn huisgenoot heeft hij 2 jaar geleden voor de lol een Tea Party bijeenkomst in Washington gecrasht; verkleed als arabieren en met spandoeken waarop te lezen was dat Mohammed een originele Tea Party supporter was.
In Philadelphia loop ik langs een boekwinkel, waar ‘The Art of Compromise’ in de etalage pronkt. Toepasselijk staat de titel afgedrukt in een Nederlandse vlag. Volgens de auteurs dwingt het Amerikaanse 2-partijensysteem tot een eenzijdige focus op het verslaan van de tegenstander. Daardoor wordt het sluiten van compromissen na campagnetijd vrijwel onmogelijk.
Soms lopen de gemoederen zo hoog op dat er geweld aan te pas komt, stelt Independence Hall park ranger Chris. In de geschiedenis hebben tegenstellingen tussen Republikeinen en Democraten zelfs tot de dood geleid.
Wat dat betreft is polderen zo slecht nog niet.
"If we can build a house together, then why can't we build a country together?" Republicans and Democrats unite to build a house; one part built at the RNC in Tampa, the other part built at the DNC in Charlotte.
Talking 'Green' with the Republicans
At a panel discussion organised by the American Energy Alliance, economist Stephen Moore argued that the gas industry has created more jobs in the past few years than any other industry. Kansas congressman Mike Pompeo says people are being misled by the jobs argument that Obama’s 800 billion dollar stimulus would create more green jobs.
All three participants agree that they are not against the development of so-called ‘green’ forms of energy. They just do not want tax payers’ dollars to pay for it. If there is a need for these energy sources, the free market will bring forth an investor that sees profit in them and they will be developed. The government should not try to make renewable energy cheaper by making Red White and Blue energy more expensive.
Wyoming Senator John Barrasso also wonders whether natural gas and oil are not actually greener forms of energy. Wind and solar power demand heavy industrialising of large parts of land and ethanol production suffers from corn shortages due to drought. Moreover, he believes “we are not the ones causing global warming. If the US shut down today there would still be steeply rising carbon levels in the air.” “The US has no impact on it, it is simple mathematics,” Mike agrees.
So if the US is not substantially contributing to climate change and renewable energy sources are not actually greener, why should anyone want to invest in them? Especially when you consider Stephen’s claim that “there is more oil in North Dakota than in Saudi Arabia because of hydraulic fracturing and parallel drilling.” The US could be entirely energy independent within the next 20 years.
The Obama administration should therefore level the playing field for energy and cancel all subsidies and carbon taxes, according to the Republicans.
Except, the US still has the second largest carbon emission in the world and it is still unclear what the health risks of hydraulic fracturing are. And author Michael Grunwald shows in his book ‘The New New Deal’ that Obama’s stimulus did lead to a greener economy with more jobs that "includes the largest expansion of antipoverty programs since the Great Society, lifting millions of Americans above the poverty line and reducing homelessness".
Liberty Rocks - the need for a 3rd party?
And that’s what some people choose to do, according to libertarian Delilah. She usually votes for the Libertarian Party. Not because they will ever be in power, but because voting for a third party sends out a signal that you do not agree with either the Democrats or the Republicans.
Delilah is not the only one who considers herself a libertarian. Most Americans we have met so far would talk about the importance of both moral and economic freedom and attest that their vote for either the Republicans or the Democrats was mostly a choice between two evils.
Even Christian Republicans like Michele say they are not in favour of legislating anti-abortion or outlawing same-sex marriage. However, given her Christian background she does feel more in touch with a party that subscribes to those values. She will therefore vote Republican even if she does not agree with certain central GOP platform issues.
Liberal democrat Nick says this is just what a two-party system is about and he thinks the same problem would arise within the libertarian party: “libertarian, what does that even mean!?” Delilah agrees: “even though libertarians are all in socially liberal and economically conservative, they disagree on many issues too.”
Different polls show that 20% of the American population considers himself a libertarian. However, their votes are spread across a libertarian republican candidate, the libertarian party and the democratic party of not lost altogether to libertarians who do not vote because they believe any vote is a confirmation of the current governmental system which they do not support.
This does make me rethink the concept of democracy. If many Americans are not voting for what they actually want, but for something that is ‘least out of line’ with what they believe; is that what a democracy was meant to be like?
Everybody loses.
Volle kaart. Bingo!
Working towards a free world, one sip at a time
Christian women for Obama say the Republican party is not the most logical choice if you are a christian, because you should not legislate abortion and anti-gay views.
Young Republicans want Ron Paul instead of Romney
Als je wil begrijpen wat een zwarte president betekent in dit land. Als je wil begrijpen wat ongelijkheid betekent. Als je wil begrijpen wanneer politiek persoonlijk wordt. Gebruik dan de komende 6 minuten van je tijd voor dit interview met Rev. Gerald Durley.
It's not over. The battle continues, but we'll only win when we all win
—Rev. Gerald Durley on inequalities in American society today
"We understand that we still face a very racially divided nation. In terms of fear, in terms of ignorance, in terms of a total lack of and non-communication."
—Rev. Gerald Durley, talking on the political landscape of 2012.
American Architecture?
I am reminded of this story because now that I am actually in the US, I've seen neighborhoods where I thought: "How typical American". But why is it so typical? And why do I instantly feel something odd looking at that picture in the magazine, when it's only the pavement that's a little different. I believe that the way our environments are designed and planned heavily influence our perception of a city or neighborhood. The houses and buildings, and how they're designed, tells something about the people living there. We're so used to the streets we walk on, the roads we drive through, that it's only when abroad that we are confronted with the differences. And, not in the least, the effects those differences have on us.
I came to the US expecting to find out more about the coming elections. About people's perception of it and the way they feel about American politics in general. What I've come to find is that —as could be expected I guess — politics is only a part of a culture that slowly I begin to understand more of. I'm still struck by odd things like canned spaghetti bolognese and supersized sodas. But those are the extremes of a country that is so very diverse. In heritage, in political views, in clothing, thinking, anything really. "There is no such thing as the average American", Ken, a libertarian and independent voter, told us the other day.
But those extremes, especially when it comes to eating, seem odd to a lot of Americans as well. Mike, the manager of a shoe store in Nashville told us that he just doesn't get it. Why would you want to poison your body by going to McDonalds for breakfast, lunch and dinner and then sit behind your desk for the rest of the day. "And the worst part of it, is that we have to pay for it. Even though I go running every other day to keep fit." It seems though that the way this country deals with food is formed by a certain structure. Just like the large distances and poor public transport encourage car use, the idea that more food is better is the base of a structure that encourages bad eating habits. It's the free refills, the "don't you want the extra chips and cheese dipping for only 80c more?". It's part of a genuine tendency to give and share, but it's killing at the same time. Literally, if you look at the amount of obesity in this country.
It is all part of a larger culture that, as a whole I must admit, I have fallen in love with. But the example of the suburb I mentioned earlier is not randomly chosen. I feel that the physical manifestation of this culture can be found in public spaces. It is on the one hand the large sidewalks that encourage encounters with strangers, and on the other hand it's the largeness of the whole city plan that forces car use. Thus you will find large empty planes of concrete around every other corner filled with cars and desolate of any other form of life. And you will find that anyone who can touch the steering wheel and the gas pedal at the same time owns a car. It's the green spaces, the parks, the trees, the front yards, the back yards, that are everywhere, and at the same time you are overwhelmed by the amount of concrete, steel and neon.
There is an election coming up, but I'm no longer sure what to think about that. How can such a diverse country be represented by one person? I do know that there seems to be a relentless amount of energy among the people here. Whomever is elected, most of the people probably don't really care. And maybe they're right. Maybe it is true that, like we've been told, without a long history this country still needs to figure itself out if that's even possible. But where the cities are easy to navigate because of the grid-like structure, the thoughts, minds and differences of all its citizens are definitely not as easy to navigate. We'll keep looking for a moral compass.
What is it like to be able to own a gun? We had no idea, but Stephen was able to tell us some very interesting things about an essential and widely discussed element of American culture and politics: guns.
While we are in the US trying to figure out how this country actually works, some Americans from the NPR show Planet Money are doing the same thing the other way around in Europe. At the Dutch/German/Belgian border to be precise, they are looking at the unity in the European Union. Their conclusion: still a long way to go. It's an interesting listen if you're in for an American perspective on the EU.