Singapore-Lah!
Last November 27 until December 1, I visited 3 preschools in Singapore as part of my practicum program.
I think this trip really enlightened me as to the necessary element of collaboration amongst educators. I love how as we go through different schools, there are similar concerns: special needs children, difficult parents, assessment, training/ professional development (or the lack of). But clearly each school has a different way of talking about and addressing these concerns. Although some perspectives, or even some problems are similar -- the proposed solutions may be different. It's always good to see another point of view. How are we the same? How are we different?
(I've decided not to mention the name of the preschools because they have been very gracious to receive me and my group. These are just my personal opinions as part of the requirements for my practicum program. They are said in the quest to exercise critical thinking and to not just accept what's presented. But not at the cost of hurting these school's reputation. I do not want to disparage them in any way. They are all wonderful schools, each in their own way. Each child is different and I am glad that there are different options available for what each parent feels their child needs.)
School 1: M
• Good school for the typical working Singaporean parents. It has multiple locations in the metro. Parents can leave their children from 7am-7pm. Their marketing is based on “success” and being a “champion” – having a champion mindset
• They call themselves “progressive” however the children for most part do not look like they are from progressive schools. They line up and sit on the mat perfectly. They wear uniforms. During the observed class activities, the teacher is in front giving direction. The location is ideal for working parents, however it does not make outdoor play easily accessible. They do try to address this by having an indoor gym but it still doesn’t compare to actual fresh air, being in touch with nature.
• The only thing that seems progressive is that the curriculum is emergent under pre-set units of inquiry. They still have set “subjects” which are their proprietary programs: Writing Made Fun, Love for Chinese Language, Numeracy Strategies, Gourmet Moments etc.
• It appears that they have found a marketable mix of “progressive” as well as traditional curriculum to appease Singaporean parents. In fact looking at one of their brochures, the testimonial from one set of parents states, “M_____________ Preschool also prepared C_______ and D_____ for Primary 1. In fact they achieved grades 90% for their 3 main subjects.” This DOES NOT sound like parents endorsing a progressive school. There is a clear disjoint in values versus looking at the parents who created the Reggio Emilia school in Italy.
• Clearly it is a BRAND. A product aimed at a target market. Everything is very professional looking and obviously came from a marketing machine.
• To be honest, I would bring this school to the Philippines. As I was going through the tour, as a parent I liked what I saw. If I had enrolled my child in this school, everything that they are presenting to me would reassure me that my child is getting a wholistic education.
School 2: B
• For me it was the highlight of the whole trip. ☺ Even before the trip it was the one I was really excited about and now that it’s done it’s the school I remembered the most.
• Upon entering the place, you feel calm. The entire place exuded peace, calm. Everything was so beautifully organized and coordinated. We asked Barbara and she said everything follows the rule of three: a base color plus two more (so blue, green and white), three items on a table etc…What was good though is that it wasn’t aesthetics for the sake of just that. Barbara says that their philosophy is chaotic classroom = chaotic child. Truly it was the environment as the third teacher.
• I loved how everything seems so collaborative. The teachers said they met twice a week (?) to talk about what was happening in each other’s classrooms. And how they know what each teacher is capable of and it seems they try to utilize each other’s talents as much as they can. Like Barbara said when asked how do they come up with the art – she said they try to have at least one “creative” teacher for arts given that they don’t have a resident atelierista (?).
• I loved how they really emphasized that they are a Reggio Emilio “INSPIRED” school and how it’s really open to interpretation. Whether it’s a school in a building deep in the city or on a tree deep in the jungle, it’s really how you imbibe the spirit of Reggio. I’ve talked to some teachers who perhaps have gotten caught up in the details of how a Reggio school supposedly “should” be. But really there’s not shoulds and shouldnts. It’s really how you adapt your resources to create the best program for the children.
School 3: C
• Although the Principal appeared (or tried to be?) very welcoming, we were only able to make inferences from what we were able to observe. We were not given a walking tour of the campus. Instead we were told to simply ask any teacher as we roamed around campus.
• From what we see it appears that C________ is the closest to a traditional setting amongst the schools visited, very mindful of goals and standards.
• In one kindergarten classroom, we observed piles of worksheets. Students were divided into smaller groups. The other groups were able to go into other play areas or centers as one group is with the teacher as she talks them through the worksheets. In two other classroom of older children (perhaps Grade 4) they were again accomplishing worksheets with their teacher.
• I think as with any school, teachers are the most valuable resource. It could be a very traditional school. But if the teacher believes that there's more than one way to teach a child, his classroom will be an enriching experience for his students.
Again it was a wonderful and amazing experience to see how other schools in another country teach. What I realized is that it is truly amazing to see teachers who are inspired. Their enthusiasm is catching. It is obvious. Teachers who are inspired and love what they do are really creative. It shows in the kind of activities they do with the kids, their demeanor with the kids. They look physically better -- healthier. I'm beginning to believe that the best teachers run on coffee and inspiration alone. I have to remember through the hardest days with my students, look for inspiration. Be inspired.
Would I do this trip again even though it was quite financially straining? Most definitely. It is different to see the teachers in action. To be able to ask the questions and conform follow up questions based on their responses. To look these people in the eye and be able to run your anti-b*llsh*t meter on it. It's real life. I think it's been said, but really this is not something one can read in a book.