taylor price
No title available

tannertan36
One Nice Bug Per Day
No title available
YOU ARE THE REASON
Stranger Things
KIROKAZE
Jules of Nature

blake kathryn

Andulka

⁂
i don't do bad sauce passes
tumblr dot com

Discoholic 🪩
trying on a metaphor

Origami Around
Not today Justin
🪼

oozey mess
seen from Türkiye
seen from Singapore
seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Finland
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Portugal
seen from Armenia
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@threewhiskeylunch
About Lorepository
Hello, Tumblr! We're Lorepository, a character repository site and online marketplace for adult creatives.
We're a staunchly anti-AI platform and have implemented several tools to prevent known AI search engine crawlers from accessing your work. We take our community's content seriously
We wanted to put together a pinned post of Lorepository resources for you all:
About page
FAQ
No AI training policy & countermeasures
Help & support page
If you have any questions or feedback, please feel free to share here. You're also welcome to submit a ticket through our site. Either way, we'll get back to you as soon as possible!
Q&A
Do I need an invite code to create an account?
No, you do not need an invite code. Anyone over the age of 18 is welcome to create an account at any time.
Why is the minimum age 18?
Our vision for Lorepository is a mature creative space. This isn't because we're focused on adult content, but because we believe there's value in a platform designed specifically for adult creators where they can engage without the added considerations that come with sharing a platform with minors.
For the doodle requests, maybe a gladiator/knight Zaeed? Whichever sparks more joy :)
Veteran mercenary gladiator
After much too long of a delay, the first iteration of the Nominations Spreadsheet has been created for easier perusal of noms that have already been submitted! Please let me know if you see something wrong and/or missing from the spreadsheet that you think should be there! Thank you!
i went insane while drawing this…
why not have the reader re-read a sentence now and then? it won't hurt him....
you get reincarnated in the mass effect universe. pick your bestie
ash
kaidan
joker
garrus
liara
tali
james
kelly
samara
miranda
other (put in tags)
I want to talk about policing the use of AI in creative writing fan spaces any why attempting to investigate and punish people this is a terrible idea.
Now let me be clear - Gen AI is awful and most people agree that it has no place in creative spaces, but that's besides the point. I'm not here to debate AI in creative spaces, I'm here to talk about the moderators who feel the need to investigate and punish writers who they believe use AI.
I'm going to start by reminding people of two important things:
There is no way for anyone to know for certain if someone is using AI to write - unless they tell you they are. The common "tells" that are cited online are found in the work of people who have excellent control of functional grammar, good vocabularies, and an excellent control of sentence structure. AI is trained on the work of talented writers.
There is no way for an author to defend themselves against a claim that they are using AI, especially in an online environment. Nor should an author have to. The rule should not be "prove you are innocent or we will find you guilty!"
I feel very passionately about this and have for quite some time. I've seen fandom witch hunts before, and I know how easy it is for some people to climb to moral high ground and punish those they believe are doing the wrong thing.
My friend recently chose to leave a discord server after the mod team contacted them to announce that there had been reports made by people who wished to be anonymous who suspected their work was AI generated. The mods explained that they had investigated these claims by looking over their writing, and although they admitted they could not be 100% certain the work contained AI, they were issuing a strike/warning to them in accordance with their discord rules because they believed they might have.
The investigation involved them reading some of their work.
That was it.
They read their work and decided that, in their own words, they thought it might be AI so they were issuing a strike. They then proceeded to delete the writing they had shared on the server without any opportunity for this person to retrieve it.
There was no communication prior to them issuing a strike. My friend was not told about these accusations ahead of time, the moderators did not talk to them about the accusations or raise concerns, and did not stop to ask themselves why the people making these claims wished to do so anonymously.
Perhaps if they had, they would have learned that members of their discord had been harassing this person via Tumblr anons about this issue. Instead they chose to give the bullies anonymity, to deny a writer a chance to have open communication, and issued a punishment for a rule infraction that they themselves admitted they could not be certain had been broken.
When my friend gave the names of beta readers and editors who had worked with her in real time, these moderators chose not to engage with them or seek clarification, and instead doubled down and tried to justify their decision.
My friend asked for the evidence they had that their work contained AI content, and it was not provided to them. Instead they supplied a generic statement about how they had made their decision based on their use of syntax, grammar, tone, and word choice was rolled out. But again, they did not give examples or explain this.
As someone who admins and mods several creative spaces, this kind of behaviour worries me. Actually, it terrifies me. Because anyone can be next: you, me, the brand new writer eager to share their work, or the fandom oldie.
It sets a dangerous precedent for fan spaces and the policing of creative works, because it leaves writers in these spaces open to harassment, bullying, intimidation, and censorship under the guise of keeping fan spaces "AI Free". Anyone can accuse someone of using AI to write, and this can be used to bully people out of fan spaces.
Moderators are supposed to keep fan spaces safe for members, not take it upon themselves to play detective and police creative works in case someone is using AI. In fact, mods taking it upon themselves to police writers in fan spaces by handing out warnings and bans are making fan spaces unsafe and encouraging social exclusion. This kind of behaviour will actively scare and intimidate writers into simply walking away - because who wants to hear an accusation that their work is AI?
Facilitating AI witch hunts is killing fan spaces.
Attempting to police the writing of others is alienating writers.
And if you think someone is using AI to write, don't try to be a detective, just click away and stop reading their work.
we used to turn on the TV and just watch music videos for a couple of hours. not so much anymore
Official Schedule of the 2026 Fornax Exchange
Hello everyone! We're pleased to announce the schedule for the 2026 Fornax Exchange! May 17, 2026 — nominations begin May 31, 2026 — nominations close at 11:59PM EDT (UTC -4) June 2, 2026 — sign-ups open June 16, 2026 — sign-ups close at 11:59PM EDT (UTC -4) June 19, 2026 — assignments released August 2, 2026 — assignments due by 11:59PM EDT (UTC -4) August 9, 2026 — assignment reveal at 8:00PM EDT (UTC -4) August 16, 2026 — creator reveal at 8:00PM EDT (UTC -4)
Spectre Requisitions Exchange 2026
Gift/works were revealed yesterday evening and man oh man is the one I received ever a good one. The descriptions in this were so sensory rich, and the fake date was so refreshing.
Amenable by @threewhiskeylunch
Pairing: Steve Cortez/Zaeed Massani
Rating: E
Word count: 7, 268
However much Steve has worked through his mourning of Robert, he doesn't really expect to meet anyone, especially in a time of war. But then he meets a man in yellow armor and things just kind of go off the rails after that. Not that he's really complaining. Yup. Not complaining at all.
GO READ IT!
I'm so glad you liked it! I had so much fun writing these boys.
*taps mic* Ahem. This thing still on...?
So I've been missing our boy quite a bit lately, and I think a lot of you have been, too. Let's fix that, eh?
Announcing Kaidan Porn Day!
Mark your calendars, start daydreaming up fics and art, or dust off a WIP that's been languishing in your files, anything goes.
April 17, 2026.
It's happening 😎 Tell your friends
So basically, I just spent the last half an hour shopping together a Hackett ringtone for my Droid, where he gets angry with me the longer I let it ring. I’ll never let calls just go to voice mail ever again.
Oh my God
Instagram: Once We Were Spacemen
Deadline: Nathan Fillion Says ‘Firefly’ Animated Series In Development With Co-Stars Set To Reprise Roles; Concept Art Revealed
TL;DR: It's an animated series and Joss Whedon has given his blessing, but he is not directly involved in the project.
MORE DETAILS:
Today, Sunday, March 15th 2026, Nathan Fillion and the remaining core crew of Serenity announced at Awesome Con in DC that they are bringing back Firefly as an animated series called Firefly: Still Flyin'.
In the video posted on the Once We Were Spacemen (OWWS) Instagram account, Nathan detailed what they would need and who has signed on to the project thus far:
"Joss' blessing - I have it"
The rights from 20th Century Fox/ Disney: "They got excited - they said yes"
Showrunners: a married couple who met through Firefly! Tara Butters (Dollhouse, Agent Carter, Reaper) and Marc Guggenheim (DC’s Legends of Tomorrow, Arrow)
A script - "We got it." A screenshot in the video shows the first page of a shooting script for Firefly: Still Flyin' Episode #1: "Athenia" written by Tara Butters & Marc Guggenheim.
An animation studio: Oscar and Emmy-award-winning animation studio ShadowMachine - another screenshot in the video shows some initial concept art
In the video, Nathan goes on to say that the last thing they need is a home. He asks everyone to like, comment on, and tag your friends in this post to spread the word and get Firefly: Still Flyin' a home.
While it was not explicitly stated in Nathan's video, Deadline's article on the announcement states:
"Joss Whedon, who created the original series, is not involved in the animated project."
V.E. Schwab's advice for creating memorable characters - works for both protagonists and villains
source post: X
This is really good advice.
It also ties neatly into the simplest version of the formula for getting people emotionally engaged with your characters: or how to build the moment in which your character starts moving from their initial state to the state in which they'll start changing their own lives.
First, you figure out the one important thing the character believes that they're wrong about. There's usually a core misperception that they haven't examined. Once they're forced to engage with it, it'll start to change everything about their perception of the world they're inhabiting and/or the people in it.
Then, as V.E. says, you identify the character's great desire and their great fear: the thing that character wants more than anything, and the thing or situation that terrifies them, and that they'll go to any lengths to avoid.
And having identified these two objects or situations, you build a situation in which the two forces will be in close, direct opposition to one another... then drop the character down in between them, and squeeze. Those two opposing forces become the jaws of a vise... and you crank the vise more and more tightly closed until the character has no choice but to acknowledge those opposing forces, and start (even in a small way) to deal with the pressure being exerted and push their way through.
This does not have to be, initially, a great climactic moment. In fact, it works better if it's not. It's more effective if your character has a brief low-intensity brush with these conditions-in-conflict early on. That way, when your big resolution scene comes along about two-thirds or three-quarters of the way along through the story arc, you'll have set up a resonance between that earlier hint or intimation of what's to come, and the really big blowoff. Your readers will recognize the resonance—the throb of tension between the two occurrences, like the vibration of a plucked string—and will find satisfaction both in the true resolution having been partially telegraphed earlier, and in how it's now being experienced and resolved in full.
This approach also allows you to set up more minor resonances between the realization of the conflict and its final resolution. These can serve to bind the structure of the work more closely together: to make it look (and be) less like a series of loosely strung-together plot events, and more like a unified whole, in which ripples of story business flow backwards and forwards, interpenetrating and influencing one another, and hinting at the big one to come.
But none of this can happen until the paired and opposing what-do-they-most-desire, what-do-they-most-fear axes have been defined. So that's a subject it's smart to spend some while thinking about (and for all your characters, not just the major ones), to be sure you're getting it right.
It's not unusual to get the wrong answers, or merely superficial ones, while you're still working out what's actually going on with the characters. So take your time. Eventually you'll find a set of answers that feel unquestionably right... and you can then nail those down in your notes and get on with making the kind of "good trouble" for your characters that will see them made complete.