ăă©ăă©ăŒă ăăăĄăżăŒă
A5ć€ćœą 40P ăȘăœă°ă©ăć°ć· æèŁœæŹ
5/21 éąè„żăłăăăŁăą67 A-51 æŒŹăæ±ăźăżăŹ
æăŁăŠèĄăăăźâhttps://onl.bz/qVddAap
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
One Nice Bug Per Day
Mike Driver
Stranger Things

JVL

JBB: An Artblog!

Kaledo Art
AnasAbdin

Discoholic đȘ©
tumblr dot com
trying on a metaphor

ç„æ„ / Permanent Vacation
taylor price
noise dept.

oozey mess

if i look back, i am lost

â

Product Placement

ellievsbear
No title available

seen from United States
seen from Azerbaijan
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States
@tirbushon
ăă©ăă©ăŒă ăăăĄăżăŒă
A5ć€ćœą 40P ăȘăœă°ă©ăć°ć· æèŁœæŹ
5/21 éąè„żăłăăăŁăą67 A-51 æŒŹăæ±ăźăżăŹ
æăŁăŠèĄăăăźâhttps://onl.bz/qVddAap
Tweet
What the fuck
This is absolutely fascinating. I've now been looking at Alex Colville's paintings and trying to work out what it is about them that makes them look like CGI and how/why he did that in a world where CGI didn't exist yet. Here's what I've got so far:
- Total lack of atmospheric perspective (things don't fade into the distance)
- Very realistic shading but no or only very faint shadows cast by ambient light.
- Limited interaction between objects and environment (shadows, ripples etc)
- Flat textures and consistent lighting used for backgrounds that would usually show a lot of variation in lighting, colour and texture
- Bodies apparently modelled piece by piece rather than drawn from life, and in a very stiff way so that the bodies show the pose but don't communicate the body language that would usually go with it. They look like dolls.
- Odd composition that cuts off parts that would usually be considered important (like the person's head in the snowy driving scene)
- Very precise drawing of structures and perspective combined with all the simplistic elements I've already listed. In other words, details in the "wrong" places.
What's fascinating about this is that in early or bad CGI, these things come from the fact that the machine is modelling very precisely the shapes and perspectives and colours, but missing out on some parts that are difficult to render (shadows, atmospheric perspective) and being completely unable to pose bodies in such a way as to convey emotion or body language.
But Colville wasn't a computer, so he did these same things *on purpose*. For some reason he was *aiming* for that precise-but-all-wrong look. I mean, mission accomplished! The question in my mind is, did he do this because he was trying to make the pictures unsettling and alienating, or because in some way, this was how he actually saw the world?
uuu
Through the cracks
scrunching my face real hard rn
you gotta be as gay as possible on the computer otherwise alan turing died for nothing
Robert McCall, âStarfarers,â 1979
Severance (2022â ) dir. Ben Stiller and Aoife McArdle
Yohji Yamamoto Autumn/Winter 1994
old stuffÂ
CHICKEN FARMER I STILL LOVE YOU is probably my favorite place in nampshire
What my master really is