Tottenham vs Wolves, why Mick McCarthy (Wolves coach) thinks they can take 3 points from The Lane.
Our last encounter with the Wanderers was a 2 - 0 win at their home. The goals came in the second half and near the end. The game was even in attacks till then.
So if we were able to beat them 2-0 at their stadium, why would Mccarthy believe he can come away with points from White Hart Lane?
Because of statistic. Since he took over Wolves 2 years ago. He has faced arry 5 times of those 5 matches 2 have been wins for Spurs, 2 for Wolves and 1 tie. You can not get any more even than that.
He has recognized Spurs to be a contender to the tittle. He saw us against Everton, a strong well put together team. We dominated and conquered.
I believe MacCarthy thinks that if he can hold off enough without any against goal. We will lose control and either concede a goal or end up scoreless. He is most likely to use the same strategy as Everton against us. Try to defend and use counter attack to sneak one up.
He might not be wrong. We are missing our starting center defender and two great mid. Yet for him to believe that we will not score is a huge risk in his part. We will have lenon, modric, bale, van, and ady. Come on!
Harry must likely will repeat from Wed, maybe with just Defoe instead of Van. Only because Van is prone to injuries and next week game is not for the weak hearted.
Regardless of what statistics say. We don't have any key players leaving, our starting line up for the game is focus and hungry to repeat wed performance. There are no new players added to the squat, which can affect game flow.
We are strong everywhere and its the fucking Lane, we haven't lost since last year and we are not about to start tomorrow.
Anything but a win is expected.
I believe final score will be 3-1. the reason for their score will be walker or ekotto flying on the flanks, then they will understand they can't be doing that shit all day and pull back allowing Modric to conduct our attack. As long as we keep pushing forward we will dominate.
Don't you agree?
What is interesting is that


















