some thoughts a few days later: - yes, every autistic person is different, but i have multiple autistic friends who don't write like cm and, in fact, would actually be utterly confused by the way cm writes. saying "the way you write deliberately obscures the argument at hand and makes it difficult to follow" is not ableism. - it is especially not ableism when i am also a disabled person who has difficulty with language on a regular basis due to a similar condition (adhd, as well as brain fog from other conditions). most blogs i interact with, if i say "hey, this wasn't clear, can you clarify?" the response is mainly "sure, sorry about that!" (especially among disabled bloggers lmao), but not with cm!!!! with cm, asking her to speak simpler, stay on topic, not regurgitate thousand word essays every minute....gets you called ableist. - and yes, i know i didn't directly ask her to, but i've watched others, i knew what would happen if i even mentioned it; i knew the mere suggestion would get "ABLEIST!!!!" thrown in my face. - i continue to believe the witness' first assessment, not because it was first, but because it holds more weight! they were allowed full access to tvtrope's account in which there was no way to fake shit, they were an inclusionist and therefore biased against tvtropes, they saw the messages FIRST-HAND....how do you not prioritize that evidence? - meanwhile, cm only showed them secondhand, through a live stream. i don't know how she messed with the livestream, but she had to have because otherwise the witness would have said "nope, i logged in and the messages say what cm said they said!" before cm even put out a livestream! - someone else has said it more eloquently than me before, but that whole "you said x so you believe y" when x is only barely related to y is a such an ugly, disingenuous way to dismiss and slander people who disagree with you. i'm sad at how many people fall for this shit. - aka me saying "weird lies about her father following her main" meant "cm says her father follows her main and she's worried about her father finding cm, but since cm is her main, her father is clearly not following her main" not "well obvs she's lying about having an abusive father." - interestingly, it is discourseprincesa all over again, but not in the way cm thinks. because while i don't think cm is lying about her id or abuse, she does have a lot of similar behaviors to dp. the "immediately viscously attack anyone who disagrees with you" and "shut down people who disagree with you by immediately insinuating or outright stating they are oppressive whether they actually are or not" are especially similar to dp's argument style. since i learned my lesson last time (cm ignores tags), i am explicitly saying if you are cm or one of cm's supporters, respect my boundaries and do NOT interact with this post. i am not spelling out cm's name because i don't want her or her supporters to interact with this post, not because i want her to "play dumb" and act like she and her supporters don't know who i mean. (because guess what? the block button does not actually work when you're on a side blog on mobile)
