[unknowable-known]

known in and of oneself

strange provisions, thought experiments

always so to speak

nothing to figure out, this is immediate

[animebackgroundmusic]

Visit Original Link

"The Space Between Two World" by: Nujabes from: Samurai Champloo

[unknowable-known]

Lowkey a useless question but im new to nd and i wanna know if non dualists don’t manifest or shift etc etc. dont they have “preferences”? I meann since every possibility is expressed anyways and that theyre all the same. Or is it different for everyone?

If every possibility is “expressed” then just see certain expressions as you being uninterested in them lol. It doesn’t really matter what “others” are saying. Just do you. It’s never this complicated.

There are nuanced intersections to everything, such that you can see for yourself. No need to feign ignorance for validation. You already know regardless.

[unknowable-known]

im still very puzzled as to how learning our Self can lead to being able to play in the dream and doing whatever and making anything possible

i apologise if this is a tired question

btw is it too personal to ask what you work as? plus what are your hobbies

You’re already playing and doing whatever you want in “the dream” lol

That’s the entire point, seeing that this is already the case!

One of my favorite hobbies is the automotive world and leisure driving. Also, renovation/restoration provenance of historic homes. And ofc, nature hiking in all sorts of contexts—beach side to relatively strenuous. I have other interests and hobbies, but these 3 are currently my most inspired ones.

[unknowable-known]

The absence of continuity, the absence of time, is actually proof of immediacy 😉

The insubstantiality of any definition, yes 😊

[unknowable-known]

Hi, I'm truly fed up trying to understand how to be, how to know/see and what nd actually means not the water down versions which mixes it loa, how do I rest in this knowing...

Just sit with being and let yourself take yourself in whatever way. It’s that simple. It doesn’t need to look like anything specific, there is no solid practice to follow. Sure you can question everything and see it’s just an infinite ouroboros already resolved unto itself, sure you can see past the so called layers of perception, but ultimately it’s just seeing that everything is nothing or being or awareness. If I were to give any advice: keep it simple, always

Any definition is always empty, or nothing already—you see?

[strangledplanet]

[strangledplanet]

[unknowable-known]

Hello Other people, while as individuals they are their own I AM, conscious awareness

Is that true?

There is no actual black and white answer to questions like these, ultimately

I could say no, there are no others, there is no you

I could say it’s one giant paradox

I could say look at your own experience

But the answer to any question is in self reflection. It’s not something that can be described definitively. It’ll always circle back to the only basis being unnamable. It’s only seen for itself, it’s only being itself. It’s always this simple.

Why does this all seem so complex and intricate though?

Because ‘we’re’ cool af, that’s why. We can’t even pin our own selves down, an infinite mystery unto ourselves. It really is divine and precious(and even this is saying too much)

[unknowable-known]

[unknowable-known]

unrenormalizable

…the decisive shift wasn't finally believing the correct interpretation. It was the simple, immediate recognition of whatever was present before trying to secure myself in an interpretation.

(simple as that!)

[unknowable-known]

[unknowable-known]

NIF

What do you know for certain?

(nothing, being, radiance, not-a-thing, infinite)

[unknowable-known]

4Chan Gems

the dream only serves to bring you to the natural conclusion that the awareness you seek is already here with you now

[unknowable-known]

Is there a difference between imagination and the seeming experience other than one experience seems to be in the mind and the other seems to be experienced through the 5 senses?

It’s all the same, just notice the gorgeous subtlety of your actuality, then it’s not so subtle

Within all this definition you mention, what doesn’t need to be defined?

[unknowable-known]

im kinda confused dude

i get that there's no me and that it's an idea but how is it completely nothing? kinda confused 🤔

It’s insane isn’t it? Lol. The answer to that how is infinite, so it just circles back to itself in any seeking. This doesn’t need to be answered definitively, just seen. Just be.

It’s not that there’s no you in a conclusive deterministic sense, it’s that what you fundamentally are isn’t an “object in time and space” you are only being itself, including all the experiential details that seem external to a “you”

[unknowable-known]