Vauban Eco Neighborhood and Schwartz’s Point BRT Station Final Presentation (part 2)
Last post of the blog. Thanks for a nice semester Hyesun!
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
No title available
KIROKAZE
Not today Justin
Show & Tell
Misplaced Lens Cap
sheepfilms
No title available
Mike Driver
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

Andulka
🪼
wallacepolsom
taylor price

blake kathryn

PR's Tumblrdome
Cosmic Funnies

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
occasionally subtle

shark vs the universe
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Japan

seen from Norway
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@ur-boys
Vauban Eco Neighborhood and Schwartz’s Point BRT Station Final Presentation (part 2)
Last post of the blog. Thanks for a nice semester Hyesun!
Vauban Eco Neighborhood and Schwartz's Point BRT Station Final Presentation (part 1)
See part 2
Northernmost OTR BRT Station
Upon arrival at OTR it was mostly quiet apart from the hum of power tools in the distance. It felt abandoned in a sense since there were so many vacant/under construction buildings. The area felt a little unwelcoming but as our group walked down the street nearing Findlay Market it began to feel more colorful and happy. Within these few blocks we walked, the whole atmosphere of the area had changed. I feel that 3CDC is doing good work to spread this “vibrance” all throughout OTR and hopefully soon the whole area will look similar to the Findlay Market block.
Wade, one of our group members, made this illustration of the future stop location and surrounding assets.
The new BRT station will be towards the bottom center.
Depiction of Vine Street, close to proposed BRT Station, with Findlay Park close by.
Findlay Park, with some slides and a small playground, ripe for change into an actually useable park/playground.
Schwartz’ Point, a Jazz bar, and surrounding remodeled buildings, north of future BRT station.
An interesting intersection, not a 3-way or 4-way, but a 5-way intersection.
Findlay Street, the southern cross street boundary of the BRT station.
Findlay St., with 3CDC signs as far as the eye can see.
A long street with historic and beautiful housing to boot
Location of BRT Station site along Vine Street.
Looking north at future site of BRT station.
Who knows why one would need a private alleys, only those who bought it know
Looking south from Findlay Street, future BRT station just north.
How can we improve the BRT station's connection to the unused properties nearby and other existing assets?
What design qualities do you feel are most important to have for true BRT generally?
Visit of the site of the future northernmost BRT Station in Over the Rhine.
What are the barriers to TOD in America, and how can cities overcome this issue?
Copenhagen and Atlanta
Technically there are a lot physical barriers to transit oriented development. The existence of already in place infrastructure, physical terrain, etc. However, I am in the mind that the barrier to development is politics. No development can spawn unless it’s approved, which usually involves politics. You could want to do something that you think could be for the greater good, but if it gets voted down for legitimate reasons, nothing.
Copenhagen realized this in the aftermath of the 1973 Oil Crisis, as people started to look at cars more and more differently. People started to take pedestrian and cyclist deaths more seriously, and eventually leading to massive support for standardized bike lanes throughout the city, and legislation to protect cyclists and pedestrians.
This goes the same for the Beltline in Atlanta. After the burgeoning growth of Atlanta in the 1990’s, Beltline’s founder Ryan Gravel saw the amount of unused railroads in Atlanta that were just doing nothing. He then started to formulate a plan to actually make use of those abandoned rail tracks, and even codified this idea in his Master’s thesis.Â
Over the years, Gravel had to foster support for this initiative, and showed people its potential through several parks that he helped to open, and at that point the Beltline initiative had wide support, as well as support from multiple Atlanta mayors. One of the most significant steps came in 2012 with the opening of the East Trail, showing that infact, even in a such a deep red state, there's still real, tangible support for better transit development .
TOD in Vancouver and newly alleviated Development barriers in Cincinnati
Traditionally, the concept of transit oriented development is to increase the density/height of buildings just nearby a major transportation utility. This typically would mean that rather than the highest building allowed being a 3 story building, a 6 story building would instead be allowed.
Sometimes however, if the stars align, density can be increased further. In a shining example of TOD is in Canada’s third largest city, Vancouver. Near major stations along their large automated train network, there are areas of ultra-high density development.
There is hope for other cities too. In Cincinnati, the recently passed Connecting Communities zoning reform has enabled development all around the city. Put simply, in the majority of the city, where you used to be allowed to build only 1 residential unit, you can now build 3 residential units and 1 commercial unit. In most parts of the urban core, you can build even more. While the effects of connecting communities are not yet seen, new developments should start popping up very quickly this summer.
Cincinnati Development Barriers
There are many barriers to TOD in America, but I believe the biggest one holding us back from more development is the existence of our interstate systems. Many interstate systems run right through the heart of cities, and often cut through important areas because of their goal to get people from suburbs to their jobs in downtown easier. For example, I-75 cuts right through the heart of Downtown Cincinnati, which is why it has been so hard for the city of Cincinnati to plan out bus routes on the more Western half of the city until just recently.Â
Along with this issue, another major issue facing TOD is Suburban development and the need for cars to commute from place to place. In the reading “Suburban Nation” by Andres Duany, Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, and Jeff Speck, they state that, “Since each piece of suburbia serves only one type of activity, and since daily life involves a wide variety of activities, the residents of suburbia spend an unprecedented amount of time and money moving from one place to the next. Since most of this motion takes place in singly occupied automobiles, even a sparsely populated area can generate the traffic of a much larger traditional town.” This piece from the reading explains how the need for cars is so important to those in suburbs because it’s how people can do their daily activity, because the suburbs only offer the residential needs, while downtown or areas around downtown offer jobs, commercial needs, etc. This need to commute everywhere to get needs and services, while also having the need for a job is what holds us back from TOD, because without the interstate or smaller unnecessary roadways, the suburban people wouldn’t be able to able to get their jobs or shopping as fast as they’d want to. Â
A Successful Example of TOD in America (The L in Chicago)
Chicago thrives through their railways. They help inner-city and people in surrounding areas get to their jobs every day. A great example of a train in Chicago is The L. The L has found ways to adapt to the suburban condition of interstates and roads while also providing a great use of transportation to those who need it. With its elevated railways, it provides as an example of a TOD that is not only successful, but can adapt to roadways and automobiles. Therefore, while also having this option for transportation, people are still able to navigate Chicago with a car.Â
I believe Cincinnati can incorporate a railway or streetcar system similar to what The L has produced for Chicago. If we can find a way to build and adapt over current roads and interstates, there’s a chance that public transit and automobiles can thrive in Cincinnati. The possibility to expand TOD like this to greater Cincinnati and even further would be more of a possibility too, with the railways being able to traverse suburban streets and roadways.Â
Stockholm, Some stuff sucks but could not suck so much
The big issue with incorporating transportation into cities in America is the focus on cars, roads cut through neighborhoods and prevent other modes of transportation from being properly implemented. Zoning in America seems to favor the idea of single family homes, leading to spread out communities where cars are the only sensible option. Roads also are typically added with minimal planning, leading to messy and awkward situations for both drivers and infrastructure trying to be built around it. Adjusting zoning laws to incentivize mixed use, high density projects near transit hubs and moving away from reliance on highways and cars would allow transportation to work with the city rather than against it. Stockholm, Sweden has an extensive metro network that reaches to most of Stockholm, the Tunnelbana. The Tunnelbana connects neighborhoods across Stockholm to the city center and is consistently reliable. The upkeep and focus on artistic appeal in the stations also adds to it, adding to the pleasant transportation experience. In Transforming Cities With Transit by Hiroaki Suzuki, Robert Cervero, and Kanako Iuchi, they emphasize the importance of strategic planning, effective integration, and removing the restrictive regulations to create a supportive environment for TOD’s. They say, paraphrased, that the factors needed to spur significant land use shifts from newly opened transit stations are: new nearby land developments perhaps from urban renewal projects, available developable land, strong demand for new growth, and government support like tax incentives and infrastructure investments.
Overcoming Barriers to Transit-Oriented Development
Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in the U.S. faces zoning restrictions, financial constraints, and public resistance. Many cities were built for cars, making it tough to shift to transit-centered planning. Fragmented governance and lack of coordination further complicate efforts, slowing progress on sustainable urban development.
To succeed, cities must reform zoning laws, reduce parking requirements, and encourage high-density housing near transit. Public-private partnerships can fund projects, while community engagement ensures inclusivity and prevents displacement. Investing in reliable, well-connected transit networks is also essential for long-term success.
Methods in 'Slum' Prevention and Improvement
What are the possible design strategies or community actions to alleviate slum conditions and food insecurity in Cincinnati? Incorporate references from at least one of the articles posted on Canvas.
Prevention
One of the worst things that can happen to a neighbourhood is neglect. First, there are small signs, like litter or broken windows, but slowly, neglect can lead to bigger problems if ignored. One of my (editor's) favourite quotes of all time, from a mini documentary about the problem of suburbs from the 1960's is "When people's living environments are degraded by forces beyond their control, they lose interest in their community, they hope to move out. If that's not readily apparent ... it soon will be.".
The true solution to minimising urban slums is prevention. If an area caught slipping early is the pretty much the only way to save it.
Empowering residents through education and economic opportunities is key to lasting change. In the Broken Windows Theory by James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling, they have one simple idea: when small issues, like broken windows, trash, or graffiti, are ignored, bigger problems tend to follow. But if communities take care of their spaces, it creates a ripple effect, making areas feel safer and more inviting.
What does that look like in Cincinnati? It could mean three things.
One, improving the environment. This could be cleaning up vacant lots, adding better lighting in high-crime areas, or supporting community policing efforts to build trust between residents and law enforcement. Small changes like these can help prevent bigger problems down the road.
Two, encouraging community involvement. Through neighbourhood groups or volunteer programs can also help sustain progress. When residents take ownership of their community, they’re more likely to keep it clean, safe, and thriving, creating a stronger, healthier city for everyone.
Three, offering job training, small business support, and better resources for schools, can help people embrace their communities. When people have the tools to improve their lives, they can break the cycle of poverty.
At the end of the day, real change comes from the community working together, whether that’s through local policies, grassroots efforts, or just neighbours looking out for each other. By combining smart urban design with better food access, Cincinnati can take real steps toward making every neighbourhood a place where people can thrive.
Food Insecurity
Another issue in urban areas, especially urban slums, is food insecurity. Food insecurity can be tackled through community-focused solutions that align with the Broken Windows Theory. Urban agriculture, like community gardens or rooftop farms, can provide fresh food while transforming vacant lots into productive spaces. These projects not only address hunger but also improve the look and feel of neighbourhoods, reducing the sense of neglect. Local governments and nonprofits could also support food co-ops or mobile markets to make healthy, affordable food more accessible. By addressing food needs and improving the environment at the same time, these efforts can create a positive cycle of community improvement.
Then there’s the issue of food insecurity. Many parts of the city are food deserts, meaning people don’t have easy access to fresh, healthy food (i.e. Clifton).
Prevention and Food Insecurity in Conjunction
A possible design strategy to alleviate slum conditions while also tackling food security could be to implement community centers similar to the one in Grotao, SĂŁo Paulo. This need for a community center is based of the reading Broken Windows by James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling, when they state that, “Law enforcement, per se, is no answer: a gang can weaken or destroy a community by standing about in a menacing fashion and speaking rudely to passersby without breaking the law.” This shows the need for a community space, because it could potentially keep people in these communities doing something more beneficial than involving themselves in gang activity, as well as rejuvenating the neighbourhood when others have something to pursue/look forward to other than gang related activities or crime.Â
Having this think tank incorporated in itself would offer slums a community center to bring togetherness, while also incorporating aspects of Park Royal in Dubai, with terraced gardens surrounding the center, as well as an irrigation system that would collect water flowing and send it down through these areas. The terraced gardens can be set up in a style similar to an amphitheater for a space for events or venues to be hosted, as well as an area for others to socialise. In the think tank, floors would be based off of community input and survey for what would be placed in each floor.Â
In a North American Context
In the historical drama It's a Sin, a number of young gay men with little money live together in a shared house in London during the midst of the AIDS crisis. They lack amenities inside their apartment, but are able to access them as urban amenities, such as public phones, and 24/7 restaurants with heating.
In the modern day, the amenities of the city are dwindling. Many cities are lacking large scale amenities like public transit, but especially small scale amenities. Anything you can think of like taxis, phone booths, water fountains, etc, have all been in the process of being removed in recent years. In fact, I (editor) was doing research just a couple of days ago on phone booths left in Cincinnati. According to a number of sources, there are just 2.
In addition to urban amenities, the mass adoption of strong building codes and minimum space requirements have led to things like housing being evermore expensive for people.
The conclusion I come to connecting the lack public amenities, and difficulty of finding housing, is that in America, we are elevating the standard of living for some, and pushing the remainder into homelessness. After all, it is the homeless that build the slums.
Still from El Norte (1983) of a Tijuana, Mexico shantytown.
Written by Wade Hayden, Matthew Sayers, Logan Kiser, and Fenley Jones
Edited by Fenley Jones
Transportation and Urban Form
In this post, we will take a look at transportation infrastructure and street features which can impact urban form, and improve quality of life for the residents.
Increasing Walkability
One of the easiest ways to make Cincinnati a happier city is by making it more walkable. Charles Montgomery’s Happy City explains that cities designed for people, not just cars, help build stronger communities and improve overall well-being. Studies show that walkable neighbourhoods lead to higher levels of social interaction, lower stress, and even improved physical health.
Expanding pedestrian zones, widening sidewalks, and adding more car-free areas —especially in busy spots like Over-the-Rhine and near UC’s campus, would make the city more inviting. Cities like Portland and Copenhagen have successfully turned streets into pedestrian-friendly social hubs by incorporating street seating, green spaces, and wide crosswalks. Cincinnati could do the same by adding more benches, improving lighting, and encouraging sidewalk cafés, making streets more than just traffic corridors.
A walkable city isn’t just about convenience, it’s about creating a place where people feel connected. If Cincinnati put pedestrians first, students, workers, and residents could move through the city more easily, connect with their community, and enjoy their surroundings without the constant frustration of traffic.
Designing for People
In Cincinnati, there is a general lack of spaces designed for people. This contributes not only to a poor quality of life, but negatively affects the beauty of the city. Due to the reliance on car-based transportation, chances are, many residents will go through their whole day going from one place to another, near fully disconnected from their environment. Designing human-scale places, and bringing them to the city would provide many benefits.
First, we could work towards removing vehicular traffic from the city center. Not only is vehicular traffic the antithesis of human scale, but it is a detriment to any beauty and aesthetics that may exist. One way to beautify a city, and bring to it a human scale, would be to increase the number of plazas, and reduce the number of open, wide streets built to accommodate traffic.
Second, we should build upon beautiful, historic buildings and areas, helping these existing buildings form human scale plazas and streets that bring people out of their homes into public life. Why not maintain the beauty and old town feel of Cincinnati, rather than pave over it with a big fat juicy highway? We can also add art, murals, monuments, and artistic features will not only draw people, but make the city more memorable as well.
Sitte argues that the reason ancient cities are still marvelled today is due to their harmony of beauty and functionality, an element that is typically absent in modern day cities. Making beautiful cities designed for people, rather than utilitarian cities designed for cars entices people to stay and explore, and improves the life of the residents.
Lingering not Loitering
In many cities, and especially suburbs, commercial establishments, and a productivity mindset have led to people spending less and less time in the places they are going. Only in the few large cities do Americans linger, absorb their environment, and participate in lost arts, like people-watching.
To make Cincinnati a happier city, we should focus on creating and revitalizing "third places," bringing Cincinnati more in line with the ideal vision of a city, as imagined by Charles Montgomery in Happy City.
Third places—such as parks, cafes, and community centers are critical for facilitating social interaction, building trust, and enhancing well-being. Cincinnati can start by investing in more accessible, inclusive public green spaces that encourage people to gather and connect.
For example, transforming underutilised areas into vibrant plazas or pedestrian zones can create opportunities for spontaneous interactions, which are crucial for building a sense of community. By prioritising walkability and mixed-use development, Cincinnati can bring these spaces to underserved, neighborhoods. This can reduce social isolation, and promote equity. Community initiatives like gardens, parkettes, are examples of third places, which encourage residents to engage with their surroundings and each other.
Montgomery also emphasises that shared spaces can foster empathy and cooperation among diverse groups. Cincinnati can leverage its cultural heritage and diversity by creating third places that celebrate inclusivity and connection. Events like street festivals, outdoor markets, or cultural performances in public spaces can bring people together, breaking down social barriers and fostering unity.
For instance, the success of Over-the-Rhine’s Washington Park shows how well-designed public spaces can become hubs for community engagement. Expanding such initiatives to other neighbourhoods, while ensuring these spaces prioritise human interaction over commercialisation, can amplify their impact. By designing welcoming, non-commercial spaces with ample seating, green areas, and public art, Cincinnati can cultivate a culture of inclusivity, making it a city where people feel happier, more connected, and invested in their community.
Incorporating Transit
Historically, Cincinnati had a expansive Streetcar network, stretching all across the city. In the middle of the 20th century, the city made the short-sighted decision to remove nearly all the streetcar tracks, to make way for personal cars. Today, only in a few places can you find streetcar tracks, though paved over.
Re-implementing this form of transportation would make it easier for people to rely on transit to access social spaces, jobs, education, or health facilities, and areas such as OTR, Downtown, and Clifton. It could also reduce the number of people that feel the need to drive. If the implementation of a streetcar route is planned into a street redesign, space can be better reallocated to transit or pedestrian spaces. With a new streetcar system, the lines could be planned to converge near major gathering places in Cincinnati. This could better bring the community together, and heighten the importance of such spaces, and increase the demand for plazas, green spaces, or many other opportunities.
Integrating Parks
Of any one thing that may strike someone when they visit Cincinnati, I (Fenley) would argue that it would be how few parks there are, and their low quality, in addition to the general lack of greenery in the streetscapes.
One way to solve this problem could be to convert streets into linear parks, to add more greenery to the city.
Based upon general practices of urbanism, most specifically City Beautiful concepts, and those of Ebenezer Howard, I have come up with a concept for a Vine-Walnut Street transit-way and linear park. This would see walnut street converted to a linear park with a gondola, and vine street converted into an exclusive busway with larger pedestrian areas.
This would bring together plans for *Metro BRT, the streetcar, new concepts for a Urban Gondola system, and would help to further the development of the banks, and improve routings for entertainment and sports venues in the area.
Vine street would be reconfigured to be only two bus lanes, with weight sensors or buttons for the lights going north south, so that the lights can have pedestrian priority as default, helping the two co-exist.
On Walnut street, the entire road surface would be completely removed, and replaced with vegetation, facade to facade. A smooth asphalt bikeway would allow for increased access by bicycle, and an aerial tramway above would allow for new connectivity with Cincinnati's hills.
A project like this would improve the quality of life for downtown residents, as they would now encounter greenery in their everyday lives, and experience the greenery on their commute as well.
Discussion Questions
What do you think Cincinnati can do to improve its urban form to be more human scale?
What do you think Cincinnati should do to improve its parks and green spaces to be greater in number and be more cohesive?
Written by Wade Hayden, Matthew Sayers, Logan Kiser, Myles Edlund, and Fenley Jones
Edited by Fenley Jones
Block Density
Density is very important for a liveable and tolerable city. While most developed areas in the United States now consist of sprawl, historically most cities were very dense, with small lots built up naturally over time.
Portland Oregon
We (Wade and Fenley) both chose Portland Oregon as a really good example of a dense and liveable city. In addition to good walkability and transit, Portland has a greenbelt, which restricts development to a tighter area around the city center.
Image courtesy Fenley Jones
Portland is a dense city, with an average of 8.9 units per acre for the whole city, and 180 units per acre set as a target for the city center.
Even in highly commercialised areas, there are still small businesses, townhomes, and apartment buildings, which allow for development diversity. Portland also has a lot of recreational areas for it's residents, along with an expansive, mature urban tree canopy.
Image courtesy Fenley Jones
Clifton Heights
In comparison to Portland, here are two 'blocks' from the neighbourhood of Clifton Heights in Cincinnati, which we both think are good examples of density, respectively.
I (Wade) chose the southwest-most portion of Clifton Heights, near Fairview Park, a as a block that I think is an example of ideal density.
This block is approximately 8 units per acre, with the measured area being 6 acres and having 48 units within it. The area is mostly made up of shotgun houses or town homes, but allows for some mixed use development, and options for people who want privacy, would prefer to rent, or just to shop. There is much to admire about the natural greenery along the streets of the neighbourhood. There are trees in front of many homes and tree lines visible at the ends of the streets. The streets are narrower, with parking on the sides of the streets, and with wider than normal sidewalks. All around, this part of Clifton Heights represents an ideal modern city density.
I (Fenley) chose also chose an example from Clifton Heights, the northern most and only complete block of the neighbourhood, which is the only one left historically intact.
The block is 2 acres, including sidewalks, and has 31 residential units, breaking down to 18 units per acre (for a total of 71 people living within the block, according to Statistical Atlas), and 26 commercial units, for 13 residential units per acre. This is 6 times more than any other block nearby the University campus. This block consists of small lots, where buildings have been built incrementally over time. There is only one lot within the block that is un-occupied. This pattern of development was used in all areas surrounding the campus, but now, all other examples have been demolished. I personally believe that high density built incrementally to allow for development diversity is the most beneficial to a city.
Chicago
I (Logan) believe the ideal density for city design today would be that of Chicago, Illinois with 9.0 units per acre.
This density allows for walkable, pedestrian friendly streets, green spaces for gathering and events, single-family houses, and apartments with spaces for pets and outdoor activities.
I (Logan) chose a city block in Over The Rhine near Findlay Market.
It is located at the corner of W Liberty St. and Elm St. The block is approximately 8.71 acres with approximately 80 units. This gives the block a density of 9.18 units per acre. This block has wide sidewalks and one way roads, this makes the area very walkable while also limiting traffic to only one direction. There are many community spaces and green areas which make great places for relaxing, entertainment, and community activities. The buildings are between 2 to 5 stories tall which make for a bright and open scene. Overall I find this block to be extremely pedestrian friendly and a great example of the ideal city density.
Tampa
I (Myles) think Tampa, FL has a good ratio of units to land at 5.3 units/acre. Tampa has larger houses that can accommodate multiple families.
I (Myles) think this block in Westwood is an ideal density.
It has 78 units in 16 acres, coming out to a ratio of 4.875 units/acre. The block has multiple houses clustered close together. I believe this ratio allows a feeling of private space to each unit while not wasting much space. It allows for green space and provides a community feel. Most of the buildings are residential, but it includes a public library and creates a nice nook between buildings. The streets are local streets with nice greenery and sidewalks making it a very lovely, walkable area.
Copenhagen
I (Matthew) I believe that the ideal density for a city is something like what they have in Copenhagen.
This dual side apartment layout allows for ample sunlight to residents, access to green spaces, and great walkability between the buildings as well. The provided screenshot depicts 2 apartment blocks side by side in the neighbourhood of Nørrebro. These 2 apartment blocks take up about 7 acres, with around 25 individual buildings, with each building having around 170 units. These buildings are mostly residential, but can easily be turned into multi-use buildings. This area has spacious sidewalks and plenty of green space. Copenhagen also has a building height limit on the books that acts more of guideline to keep the buildings with in 5-7 stories to maintain a low skyline and allow ample sunlight in. Obviously this area is not ideal for people who want to own homes, but if we’re able to achieve this level of density, that more than likely implies that we also wisened up to better public transit.
I (Matthew chose the neighbourhood of Mt. Auburn has the beginnings of what could be a good residential neighbourhood. The section that I chose is on Corporation Alley, with the section being about 1.8 acres, and has around ~150 units in it.
It’s a very compact area, similar to that of an Italian neighbourhood. It’s very close to OTR and downtown, meaning that it has good access to the city, as well as being relatively compact, meaning sociability will be high as well. The only change that I would make to this area is to slightly increase the size of the buildings upward to accommodate more people and turn the single family homes into du/triplexes, as a lot of the housing in this area are urban single family houses or duplexes.
Written by Wade Hayden, Matthew Sayers, Logan Kiser, Myles Edlund, and Fenley Jones
Edited by Fenley Jones
Plazas in the United States
In this post, we analyze the various features of plazas in the United States, starting with Cincinnati, moving to Cleveland, then to Marietta, Georgia, and Portland, Oregon.
Cincinnati’s Fountain Square
Cincinnati’s Fountain Square is a lively gathering place in downtown Cincinnati, featuring events, dining, entertainment, and the iconic Tyler Davidson Fountain in the middle.
Seating: Seating options in Fountain square create social and gathering spaces for all people in the downtown area to connect. They are also serve as place to simply relax, or eat food from the vendors nearby. Fountain Square has enough seating for many people.
Stage: The performance stage gives an outlet to small performers and big artists alike, while also giving the community something to come together with.Â
Fountains/Greenery: Fountains add a beautiful architectural concept, and tall greenery adds a beautiful natural touch, accompanied by statues.
Low and Wide steps: As per one of Whyte’s principals, an aspect of Fountain Square is the low and wide steps throughout, as well as corner steps.Â
Physically and visibly open to the street: Although there is a section covered by a building, the building has an interesting architectural aspect that adds vibrance to the street. Every other section of fountain square is open to the street and is very connected to the corners of the block and the street itself.Â
Seating: Seating options in Fountain square create social and gathering spaces for all people in the downtown area to connect. They are also serve as place to simply relax, or eat food from the vendors nearby. Fountain Square has enough seating for many people.
Stage: The performance stage gives an outlet to small performers and big artists alike, while also giving the community something to come together with.Â
Fountains/Greenery: Fountains add a beautiful architectural concept, and tall greenery adds a beautiful natural touch, accompanied by statues.
Low and Wide steps: As per one of Whyte’s principals, an aspect of Fountain Square is the low and wide steps throughout, as well as corner steps.Â
Physically and visibly open to the street: Although there is a section covered by a building, the building has an interesting architectural aspect that adds vibrance to the street. Every other section of fountain square is open to the street and is very connected to the corners of the block and the street itself.
Cleveland’s Public Square
Cleveland's Public Square is a historic, vibrant hub featuring monuments, green spaces, events, and architecture, serving as the heart of downtown.
Enhanced Access to Landmarks: Public Square provides clear sightlines and pedestrian-friendly pathways to major landmarks like the Terminal Tower and Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Monument, making it an accessible civic gathering space.
Improved Sanitation & Green Space: The 2016 redesign removed excessive vehicle congestion, replaced hard surfaces with more green space, and introduced water features to enhance air quality and public health.
Wide Boulevards & Open Walkways: Inspired by Haussmann’s Parisian boulevards, Public Square features broad, open paths for easy movement, unobstructed views for safety, and ample seating areas.
Efficient Transit & Commercial Connectivity: Acting as a transportation hub, the square seamlessly connects Cleveland’s bus and rail systems while ensuring direct access to commercial centers like Tower City.
Multifunctional Public Space: Designed for large gatherings, events, and daily use, Public Square supports pedestrian flow, cultural events, and economic activity, much like Haussmann’s plazas in Paris.
Atlanta's Marietta Square
Unlike a lot of “plazas” in the Atlanta Metro Area, Marietta Square is a more traditional square, with numerous benches and areas for people to sit down, and take a pause from life. There is a lot of greenery and flowers around.
Open Spaces: Where there aren’t walking spaces, the rest of the space is grass and trees, adding to the air and ambiance of the square.
Seating: There are some stairs, but only in the areas in which there is a slight drop-off. Seating is mainly provided by benches.
Water Features: At the center of Marietta square there is a fountain, which makes a great incorporation of water, and the edge of the fountain also serves as seating.
Proximity to Shops: There are stores around it, all of which are either local or non-chain businesses, with decent walkability between them all.Â
Accessible to Motorists: There is adequate parking around, not too much, but not too little.
Walkability: The area’s decently walkable by Georgia standards, so slightly below standards for anywhere else but Texas, but for what it is, it’s pretty good.
Portland's Pioneer Square
Pioneer Square, across from Pioneer Courthouse in Portland, Oregon, is an incredibly successful plaza with regular food vendors, a water feature, lots of seating, and is surrounded by MAX Light Rail. It embodies a number of Whyte's Principles.
Sitting Space: Portland's Pioneer Square has a number of seating places. There are tables and chairs, sitting steps, and benches to sit on.
Sun and Trees: With the dense urban street canopy opening in the middle of the plaza, it provides a contrasting luscious and bright atmosphere.
Water: With a water feature on either side of the TriMet Ticket office, it provides a relaxing sound and visual stimulation.
Transit: With the ticket office in the center, and surrounded by MAX Light Metro on three sides, the plaza could not be closer connected to transit.
Written by Wade Hayden, Matthew Sayers, Logan Kiser, and Fenley Jones
Edited by Fenley Jones
City Beautiful
The City Beautiful movement has a emphasis on large green spaces, and grand, planned, and centralized corridors for travel. It believes that all cities can be beautiful. Cities that implemented concepts created by or related to City Beautiful now find themselves as prime examples of 20th century beauty.
in Navigation,
Many European cities' street networks have major routes converge to landmarks, which can theoretically make it easier to navigate (i.e “Go to [x] landmark, which as at the end of [y] street, then turn left”, etc.), examples of this would be Paris, especially after works done by Georges-Eugène Haussman. These routes typically connect plazas and open areas. On the topic of plazas, it is important for plazas to include seating areas, in addition to places to congregate, for the plaza to be useful.
Image courtesy of Fenley Jones
The idea of large boulevards also would be a good to incorporate in Cincinnati. Although originally meant for troops, citizens could benefit from having more straightforward routes, as most streets are very narrow. The only issue with this would be the removal of businesses along the street and a more easily achieved car centric focus it would bring.
In Cincinnati, Central Parkway is a result of the the City Beautiful movement. In the picture below, you can see the pedestrian green space between the travel lanes. This has been removed, and has been replaced by a narrow grass median. Generally, if a roadway is called a 'parkway' from 1900-1960, it is a result of City Beautiful concepts. Louisville has an entire system of parkways.
in Planning,
Another thing to learn from the various city beautiful concepts, is that is sometimes good to relegate skyscrapers and high-rise buildings to certain areas in a city, to maintain a city’s historical characteristics.
in Transit,
Almost every pure City Beautiful plan comes with mass transit. In the 30's, peak city beautiful, it was simply the future. Oftentimes, this was in the form of a large network of rail lines going into and out out of the city center. A good example of this would be Chicago.
Chicago Transit Authority
An example of Haussman’s Principle 4, facilitating circulation to and from the railway station by penetrating lines straight to the centers of commerce, would be great for downtown Cincinnati. Oftentimes during large events the downtown area gets very congested and becomes hard to navigate. I feel like if Cincinnati adopted this principle it would be much easier to walk, drive, and overall enjoy the city. Parking is a large issue and if we had the riverfront at the “centerpoint/crown jewel” of Cincinnati with all public transportation travelling to this one point, people could park further away and use the public transportation to get to the riverfront causing less traffic congestion and an increase in pedestrian safety and enjoyment. This was most recently attempted in the early 2000's, with the Riverfront Transit Center, which now sits abandoned, all but two days every two years.
Image courtesy of Fenley Jones
of Space
Another idea of Haussman's was, in Paris, to “have one park in each neighborhood so that no one was more than a ten minute’s walk from a park. This would be a great incorporation to Cincinnati's neighborhoods. For some neighborhoods, residents may not have a space to gather and socialize with each other, but having a park in every neighborhood would create a space for this to happen.
Image courtesy of Fenley Jones
Cincinnati could also take inspiration from Chicago’s lakefront. Cincinnati’s riverfront is developed with stadiums, but when it's not a game day and crowded with people for the event, the area has very little life. Cincinnati could take inspiration from Chicago’s lakefront, with larger scale green spaces, and less constructed spaces. One of our group members thinks that Chicago’s “Movie in the Park” is a great community event and that Cincinnati needs something similar to bring people to our riverfront space.Â
In Louisville, Harland Bartholomew created a parks and downtown park/plaza plan for Louisville in 1931, the peak of the City Beautiful Movement. It incorporated rail transportation, parkways, parks, a centralized parking garage, and of course Art Deco Buildings. It was never built, but a later plan by Fredrick Law Olmsted was built to the point, and still exists today.
Image digitized by Fenley Jones
Art deco, especially when combined with colonial architecture, is a hallmark of city beautiful plans, as these were supposed to come across as grand, stately, and traditional. This was unfortunately later implemented by Nazi Germany, which tarnished this style's reputation, but it is still well-liked in the modern day.
Overall City Beautiful is a well appreciated design concept, and when realized, create invaluable places for cities.
Written by Wade Hayden, Matthew Sayers, Logan Kiser, Myles Edlund, and Fenley Jones
Edited by Fenley Jones
Garden Cities
Our group believes that the garden city is the most versatile, applicable, and beautiful theoretical concept. Garden cities, especially if combined with city beautiful concepts, can provide valuable outdoor space, fresh air, and light to compacted city dwellers.
We see three major conceptual scales of garden cities, with the largest being the most difficult to construct, and the smallest being the easiest. We call this achievability. In this post we will look at achievability, along with usability, modularity, efficiency, and sustainability.
Achievability
Large Scale Garden Cities
Large Scale Garden Cities, like Garden Cities of To-morrow by urban planner Ebenezer Howard, is a large scale plan, to develop a vast region into a collective city. While visionary in its approach, and understanding of human desire, it lacks achievability due to it's vast scale. The only way a plan such as this could be implemented would be in consequence of mass destruction. These type plans can use their large scale to create great efficiencies, such as population centralization or grouping like land uses.
Medium Scale Garden Cities
Most frequently implemented, medium scale garden cities typically interpret the idea of open space as preserving areas as parks or using them for farmland. These take the form of greenbelts or green-fingers. This is contrasted to the unplanned open space form affectionately named 'spots'. A few quintessential examples, as well as a few local examples are listed below in their respective categories.
Green Belt
The green belt, pioneered by the British for London, was the answer to maintaining access to the countryside for the metropolis. London's greenbelt was inspired by Howard's original plans for garden cities. While very effective, few modern cities have greenbelts, especially in America. Portland, Oregon is notable for having a greenbelt, made possible by legendary environmentalist Tom McCall.
London
Portland
Green Fingers
The green fingers approach solves the early 20th century's problem with city dwellers access to light, air, and the countryside. It often takes shape as parklands in between developed areas. Helsinki, Finland pioneered this idea in the mid 20th century, and it has since spread to other cities in the world. In some places, like in Louisville, Kentucky, it was seeded with an Olmsted master plan in the 20th century, and has been mostly maintained in growth patterns.
Helsinki
Louisville
'Spots' (not a garden city concept) (for comparison)
Take note of the large swathes of land where it would take hours to get to any place that could be considered 'undeveloped'.
New York
Small Scale Garden Cities
The idea of small scale garden cities has yet to be realized in real life. Best implemented in rural areas, near to a city, these would take shape of a co-operative high-rise, multi-purpose building, surrounded by a co-operative farm. With a food source this close to a population center, it allows residents to be far more intimate with their food supply. This would be adjacent to a mainline railway station, with relatively frequent trains to the city. This would also be an effective tool against unruly growth in small towns, as a method of efficient, planned consolidated growth, where the density is great enough, to have an acceptable cost to service. Fenley's personal favorite example of this is Solving the Housing Problem by Hugo Gernsback, a magazine editor, and the inventor of modern day science-fiction.
Image restored by Fenley Jones
Usability
A garden city could easily be more usable than a city with a traditional development pattern. There are several ways this is achieved. Centralizing density, there becomes a far more likely chance that the place you want or need to go is close to the place you are coming from. With transit is planned in from the beginning, connecting to these population centers, making it easy to travel further if necessary. Additionally, will more people in a smaller area, it becomes a challenge for a person to put themselves into social isolation as many inadvertently do in modern cities. Lastly, mass employers are accessible nearby, making it easier for all people to find employment, no matter their skill level.
More still, with gardens surrounding the city center, social environments are within easy access, along with leisure and pleasure areas.
Modularity
If realized at the greatest scale, in form of city-nodes, modularity can be achieved. In a network of numerous nodes of different types, resiliency is created. This could lessen logistical burdens, simplify access routes, and provide for an efficient network. For example, if a city-node along the coast is subject to some natural disaster, the other city-nodes can absorb some of the impact from this city.
Efficiency
Separating the various uses of the city diligently, as proposed in the concept by Ebenezer Howard, could potentially create great efficiencies. Such categorization could potentially take advantage of economies of scale, minimize distance goods and services travel, and simplify understanding of an area by it's citizens.
Sustainability
Lastly, garden cities, and cities that implement garden city concepts can be very sustainable.
By concentrating the population, it put more people and services within closer reach of other people and services, and when these people need to access further away people and services, it is efficient to transport them there.
By centralizing housing and planning, it allows for blocks of modular, easy to manufacture housing. Known in western vernacular as Commie Blocks, as the USSR made extensive use of modular, easy to manufacture housing to quickly and cheaply improve the living conditions of its people.
By developing more on less land, the land is free to be left undeveloped, or landscaped for the benefit of the citizens. For example, in the plan by Ebenezer Howard, only 1000 out of 6000 acres are used for development therefore leaving 5000 acres free for animal habitat, recreational space, and natural areas.
By zoning special areas far away from the population center, it can reduce pollution for the residents. Additionally, the Large number of trees and vegetation, can assist in removing pollutants and absorbing noise pollution too.
With such prominent and abundant vegetation, any person is close to nature at all times, while still being able to access the amenities of a city.
With centralized population and business centers, public transportation is available to the citizens, and service is as efficient as possible.
Sustainability in the sense of long-term vitality is not forgotten either. In concepts with co-operative ownership, rent and revenue would pay for government services, and lead the city to long term financial stability.
In summary, sustainability in a garden city is just one aspect achieved by concentrating development, preserving natural spaces, reducing pollution, and planning public transport into daily life. Their design integrates long-term environmental, social, and economic resilience, as a model for urban growth.
Written by Wade Hayden, Matthew Sayers, Logan Kiser, Myles Edlund, and Fenley Jones
Edited by Fenley Jones