Any movie that ends with a nunchuk fight with president Richard Nixon deserves a special mention
Three Goblin Art
No title available
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

Kiana Khansmith
Today's Document
RMH

blake kathryn

#extradirty
No title available
d e v o n
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
trying on a metaphor

tannertan36
One Nice Bug Per Day
styofa doing anything
hello vonnie
🪼
Sade Olutola
No title available
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore

seen from Maldives
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia

seen from Colombia

seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Austria
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@usasop-blog
Any movie that ends with a nunchuk fight with president Richard Nixon deserves a special mention
NASA Uses Earth as Laboratory to Study Distant Worlds
NASA & NOAA - Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) patch. June 29, 2018 The study of exoplanets – planets that lie outside our solar system – could help scientists answer big questions about our place in the universe, and whether life exists beyond Earth. But, these distant worlds are extremely faint and difficult to image directly. A new study uses Earth as a stand-in for an exoplanet, and shows that even with very little light – as little as one pixel – it is still possible to measure key characteristics of distant worlds.
Image above: These images show the sunlit side of Earth in 10 different wavelengths of light that fall within the infrared, visible and ultraviolet ranges; the images are representational-color, because not all of these wavelengths are visible to the human eye. Each wavelength highlights different features of the planet – for example, the continent of Africa is visible in the lower right image, but is nearly invisible in the upper left image. These observations were obtained by NASA’s Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC) instrument onboard the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Deep Space Climate Observatory, or DSCOVR, satellite, on Aug. 2, 2017. Image Credits: NASA/NOAA. The new study uses data from NASA’s Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC) instrument, which is onboard the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Deep Space Climate Observatory, or DSCOVR, satellite. DSCOVR goes around the Sun at Lagrange point 1, a specific orbit that provides EPIC with a constant view of our home planet’s sunlit surface. EPIC has been observing Earth continuously since June 2015, producing nuanced maps of the planet’s surface in multiple wavelengths, and contributing to studies of climate and weather. The EPIC instrument captures reflected light from Earth in 10 different wavelengths, or colors. So, each time EPIC “takes a picture” of Earth, it actually captures 10 images. The new study averages each image into a single brightness value, or the equivalent of one “single-pixel” image for each wavelength. A single, one-pixel snapshot of the planet would provide very little information about the surface. But in the new study, the authors analyzed a data set containing single-pixel images taken multiple times per day, in 10 wavelengths, over an extended period. Despite the fact that the entire planet had been reduced to a single point of light, the authors were able to identify water clouds in the atmosphere and measure the planet’s rotation rate (the length of its day). The authors say the study, in the June 27 issue of the Astrophysical Journal, demonstrates that the same information could be derived from single-pixel observations of exoplanets.
Image above: This artist’s illustration shows an enhanced-color image of Earth from NASA’s Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC) instrument (top). EPIC observes the planet in 10 wavelength bands, shown here as 10 representational-color images (middle). A new study averages data from each EPIC wavelength band down into a single brightness value, or the equivalent of one “single-pixel” image. This allowed the study authors to simulate observations of a distant exoplanet. Image Credits: NASA/NOAA/JPL-Caltech. “The benefit of using Earth as a proxy for an exoplanet is that we can verify our conclusions derived from the single-pixel data with the wealth of data that we actually have for Earth – we can’t do that if we’re using data from a distant, actual exoplanet,” said Jonathan Jiang, an atmospheric and climate scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, and lead author on the new study. A tiny point of light When Jiang’s daughter, Teresa, was in elementary school, he organized a star-observing event for her and her friends. Jiang pointed to the stars, and told his daughter that the Sun is also star, and that there are planets orbiting other stars just as planets orbit the Sun. She pressed her father for more information, asking how scientists could possibly learn about those distant worlds from such tiny points of light in the sky. “Kids ask a lot of good questions,” Jiang said. “And that question stuck in my mind – if I can see an exoplanet as only a tiny point of light, can I see clouds and oceans and land?” Jiang began his career in astrophysics, but for his PhD work, he decided to apply his computer and physical modeling skills to Earth’s climate. Now, he’s using climate data to assist the study of exoplanets. Exoplanets are significantly dimmer than stars and much more difficult to detect. Earth, for example, is about 10 billion times fainter than the Sun. Only about 45 exoplanets have been discovered by direct imaging, all of which are much larger than Earth. The majority of known exoplanets (over 3,700 have been confirmed) were detected indirectly, using techniques such as the transit method, in which scientists observe the slight dimming of a star caused by the transit of an exoplanet across the face of the star. The EPIC instrument captures reflected light from the sunlit side of Earth in 10 different wavelengths, or colors, because different materials reflect different wavelengths of light to different degrees – plants, for example, reflect mostly green light. And a reddish planet like Mars, for example, would have a very different color profile compared to a planet covered in ice.
Image above: This image shows the sunlit side of Earth, observed in 10 wavelengths by the EPIC instrument aboard the DSCOVR satellite. Each image shows the same snapshot of Earth in a different wavelength. The specific wavelength bands are indicated above each image. Image Credits: NASA/NOAA. The new study shows that by observing a planet with distinct features over time – such as oceans and continents – it is possible to measure the planet’s rotation rate by observing a repeating pattern in the reflected light. This pattern would arise from those planetary features moving into view with a regular cadence. For example, every 24 hours, Australia and the Pacific Ocean fills EPIC’s field of view, and about 12 hours later South America and the Atlantic fill the frame, with Africa and the Indian Ocean passing by in between. This pattern of changing light would repeat day after day. In the new paper, the authors show that they can detect this repeating cycle and thus determine the rotation rate, or the length of the planet’s day. The rotation rate of a planet can reveal information about how and when the planet formed, and is a particularly difficult property to measure with current methods.
Animation above: This animation shows a series of observations taken by the EPIC instrument in one of 10 wavelengths. At this wavelength, the distinction between continents and oceans is particularly visible. The repeating pattern created by the planet’s rotation could be observable to a powerful telescope observing the planet from many light years away, according to a new study. Animation Credits: NASA/NOAA. “People have been talking for some time about using this approach to measure the rotation rate of exoplanets, but there’s been no demonstration that it could work because we didn’t have any real data,” said Renyu Hu, an exoplanet scientist at JPL and a coauthor on the new study. “We’ve shown that in every wavelength, the 24-hour period appears, which means this approach to measuring planet rotation is robust.” The authors note, however, that the effectiveness of this method would depend on the unique features of the planet. A daily-cycle pattern might not be visible on a planet that is largely homogenous over its surface. Venus, for example, is covered in thick clouds and has no oceans on its surface, so a recurring daylong pattern might not appear, or might not be distinct enough to observe in a one-pixel image. Planets like Mercury and Mars would also be challenging, but Jiang said planetary features like craters could also contribute to a pattern that could be used to measure the rotation period. Imaging exoplanets Previous studies used Earth as a proxy for exoplanets, to investigate what kinds of planetary properties could be derived from afar, but no previous studies looked at so many wavelength bands. This is also the first such study to capture such a large data set, taken over an extended period of time: it used more than 27 months of observations, with images taken by EPIC about 13 times per day.
Image above: This image, taken by NASA’s Voyager 1 spacecraft from beyond the orbit of Neptune, shows planet Earth as seen from about 3.7 billion miles (5.9 billion km) away. Earth appears as a very small point of light in the right half of the image, indicated by an arrow. Dubbed the “Pale Blue Dot,” the image illustrates just how small an Earth-sized planet appears from far away. Image Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech. Direct observations of exoplanets have far less data than what was used in the new study, but the researchers report that to measure the rotation rate of an exoplanet with more than 90 percent confidence would require taking images only two to three times per orbital period (that is, per “day” on that particular exoplanet) for about seven orbital periods. The amount of time astronomers would have to observe an exoplanet to identify its rotation rate also depends on how much unwanted light is included in the exoplanet data. The EPIC data provide an exceptionally clear view of Earth, largely unfettered by light from other sources. But one primary challenge in directly imaging exoplanets is that they are so much dimmer than their parent stars. The light from the nearby star can easily drown out the light from an exoplanet, rendering the latter invisible. With the signal from the planet competing with light from the star, it may take longer to discern a pattern that could reveal the planet’s rotation rate. NASA is investigating potential designs for next-generation telescopes that might be able to directly image Earth-size exoplanets. With the field of exoplanet direct imaging moving ahead, Jiang is not done thinking about the question his daughter asked him more than a decade ago. If scientists can learn about the surface features of distant planets, then could they answer an even bigger question that his daughter posed – do any of those planets host life? Related link: Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR): https://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/content/dscovr-deep-space-climate-observatory NASA website: https://epic.gsfc.nasa.gov/ Images (mentioned), Animation (mentioned), Text, Credits: NASA/JPL/Calla Cofield. Greetings, Orbiter.ch Full article
416 chilling at the range. When it’s fully kitted it definitely has some weight to it. As fun as these guns are, I still prefer my DI uppers. - #hk416 #416 #eotech #surefire #la5 #hecklerandkoch #algdefense #trexarmskydex
Pat McNamara and his Delta buddies on the hunt for war criminals in Bosnia in the 90s.
Before the Mega Swole.
Mad MaXXX
Source
Heavy Metal🤘 Left or Right? @coltfirearms M4 with a C-MORE M26 12ga shotgun and @trijicon ACOG, and @coltfirearms 6920 with @knightarmco Master Key 12ga Remington 870 SBS - ©
This looks baller.
This is so odd…. I’ll take it.
The anthology
The Normandy Landings (codenamed Operation Neptune) were the landing operations on Tuesday, 6 June 1944 (termed D-Day) of the Allied invasion of Normandy in Operation Overlord during World War II. The largest seaborne invasion in history, the operation began the liberation of German-occupied northwestern Europe from Nazi control, and contributed to the Allied victory on the Western Front.
The amphibious landings were preceded by extensive aerial and naval bombardment and an airborne assault—the landing of 24,000 American, British, and Canadian airborne troops shortly after midnight. Allied infantry and armoured divisions began landing on the coast of France at 06:30.
When the seaborne units began to land about 06:30 on June 6, the British and Canadians on Gold, Juno, and Sword beaches overcame light opposition. So did the Americans at Utah. The U.S. 1st Division at Omaha Beach, however, confronted the best of the German coast divisions, the 352nd, and was roughly handled by machine gunners as the troops waded ashore. During the morning, the landing at Omaha threatened to fail. Only dedicated local leadership eventually got the troops inland—though at a cost of more than 2,000 casualties.
2 sick scars16s SBRs
War Machine (2017)