the whole Victorian nipple piercing thing
you’ve probably seen it on a hundred “things your history teacher didn’t want you to know!!!!” posts:
“there was totally an 1890s trend of women piercing their nipples! omg those dirty, dirty Victorians!”
my take on this is that probably like two or three particularly bohemian ladies did it, the press got hold of the idea, and those stellar late 19th century journalistic standards blew it way out of proportion. and yeah, “a nonzero number” is still more Victorians than most people expect to have had nipple rings, so the reaction nowadays would likely be the same even if it wasn’t painted as a huge trend
but because I’m me, the idea of someone being Wrong About History On The Internet still gets under my skin. so I did some research
besides a few medical journals loudly decrying the practice, the most often-cited period source on “bosom rings” is a series of letters in the magazine English Mechanic and the World of Science
sounds like a steampunk Harry Potter book title. let’s venture
the April 1888 edition included a letter, allegedly from a Polish man named Jules Orme, about how he and a friend got their nipples pierced as teenagers. and one response letter claimed to be from a woman, Constance, whose fiance/cousin (ah, the 1880s) now wanted her to have hers done after reading Orme’s account
before we go any further, I have to talk about 19th-century tightlacing erotica
any pop history discussion of the corset controversy will undoubtedly include letters written to a variety of periodicals, mostly The Englishwoman’s Domestic Magazine, by women laced down to 15″ or even 13″-waists who were quite fond of the practice. REALLY fond of it. using the phrase “delicious agony” fond of it. describing in detail the strict headmistresses and stern aunts who ordered them laced down and devised overly complicated ways of ensuring they couldn’t remove the corsets fond of it. and shortly thereafter, the same magazine started publishing very detailed letters about whipping maidservants and pretty young wives
if you’re thinking that sounds like BDSM porn, yes. yes, it does. and given the dearth of 13″ extant corsets that have been found, that’s probably exactly what it was. so there was a long tradition of using magazine correspondence pages as the proto-Penthouse by the time the nipple ring discussion commenced
“Constance” receives a reply from “Fanny,” a young lady whose nipples have been pierced for five years “at the request of an intimate friend.” allegedly this request and the piercing happened when she was 15, a detail which makes the letter read less “actual reality of a girl/woman’s life in the 1880s” to me and more “skeevy youth-fetishizing porn”
the conversation goes back and forth for a while, and then. and then.
“Constance” and her younger sister actually go to get their nipples pierced and describe the process in detail. allegedly.
this post is getting rather long, so click here for Part 2!
(source on the fetish letters in The Englishwoman’s Domestic Magazine. cw for mention, but no images, of illustrations fetishizing slavery)
(source on the nipple-piercing letters. take this blog with a grain of salt; I’m only using it for text, names/pseudonyms, and dates)