Photos taken during the set of Corona la Partida
Noah Kahan

No title available

PR's Tumblrdome
cherry valley forever

shark vs the universe
almost home
noise dept.

Kiana Khansmith

No title available

roma★
Cosmic Funnies
todays bird

bliss lane
No title available

pixel skylines
The Stonewall Inn
Interview Vampire Daily
No title available
★
KIROKAZE

seen from Poland
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from Paraguay

seen from Malaysia

seen from Ukraine
seen from Chile
seen from Argentina

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Syria

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from Chile
seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from Canada
@yxxxxxx1
Photos taken during the set of Corona la Partida
JUANA DE CASTILLA
All credits to @rhaxnyss (Tiktok)
Unbelievable news!
I have been waiting for so long for a documentary about my favorite Queen Juana de Castilla and finally there is one. Can't wait to see it!!!!
JUANA DE CASTILLA | Trailer oficial | Documental, 2026
ENTRADAS
Saturn · Sleeping At Last
Maria Isabel Barreno, Maria Teresa Horta, and Maria Velho da Costa, tr. by Helen R. Lane, from The Three Marias: New Portuguese Letters; “Fátima”
Catherine of Aragon, Juana of Castile, and Isabel of Portugal lived at the heart of a century that demanded greatness and punished vulnerability. Their names are often spoken beside kings, treaties, and dynasties, yet their true legacy is written in something more human: endurance, dignity, and the quiet strength it takes to survive a world that rarely allowed women to belong fully to themselves.
Catherine of Aragon stands as a symbol of unwavering conviction. She arrived in England carrying the weight of Spain’s prestige and her own sense of duty, and she spent years shaping her role not only as queen, but as a moral force within a turbulent court. Her story is too often reduced to a marriage and its tragic end, but Catherine’s life was defined by courage—by the way she defended her position, her faith, and her daughter with a calm determination that refused to be humiliated. Even in loss, she preserved something the politics of the age could not destroy: her self-respect.
Juana of Castile remains one of history’s most haunting figures, not because she lacked power, but because power was taken from her through fear and manipulation. Her life reflects the brutal cost of being both legitimate and inconvenient. Whether her suffering came from grief, illness, betrayal, or all at once, Juana became a woman trapped inside the ambitions of others, her pain used as a justification for confinement. Yet her existence cannot be dismissed as tragedy alone. Juana was the rightful queen of Castile, and the very fact that she had to be controlled reveals how dangerous her authority truly was. In remembering her, we honor not a caricature, but a human being whose voice was deliberately muted.
Isabel of Portugal, wife of Charles V, embodies a different kind of strength: the strength of balance. She ruled as regent with intelligence and composure, maintaining stability while her husband carried the burdens of empire across Europe. Isabel’s life is often described with elegance—her refinement, her beauty, her calm presence—but behind that grace stood sharp capability and deep responsibility. She was not merely the emperor’s companion; she was his anchor, a queen who governed in his absence and shaped the court with quiet authority. Her early death left a wound not only in Charles’s heart, but in the political and emotional center of his world.
Together, these three women reflect the many faces of queenship: the queen who resists, the queen who is silenced, and the queen who steadies an empire. Their lives remind us that history is not only made by battles and decrees, but by the private courage of those who endure what they did not choose. To honor Catherine, Juana, and Isabel is to recognize the dignity of women whose stories were shaped by forces beyond their control—and whose strength still speaks, centuries later, with undeniable power.
Documentary: Charles V – The Impossible Empire
Directed by: Wilfried Hauke
Production: ORF (2020)
Musées royaux des Beaux-Arts de Belgique - Koninklijke Musea voor Schone Kunsten van België - Fine Arts Belgium
Went to the Fine Arts Museum here in Belgium just to see the portraits of Philip the Fair and Joanna of Castile.
Master of Affligem: Portrait of Philip the Handsome and Joanna of Castile (1500)
We have here the side panels of a triptych painted by the Master of the Life of St Joseph. Differences in the posture, attire, and location of Philip and Juana are undoubtedly designed to show Philip (not Juana) as future ruler of the Spanish kingdoms.
Philip stands in front of the city walls, an open crown over his helmet, and in his right hand he holds the sword of justice and sovereignty.
Juana is shown in the park of the Warande, a part of the Coudenberg palace complex.
Her expression is melancholy and distant. Although she wears heraldic arms and a crown, it is virtually indistinguishable from the vegetation behind her and she has no sword.
Source : (Juana I: Legitimacy and Conflict in Sixteenth-Century Castile (Queenship and Power): Fleming, Gillian B.)
Philip The Handsome
Philip of Austria, Duke of Burgundy and King of Castile, was genuinely beloved in the Burgundian Netherlands. Raised at the court of Mechelen under Margaret of York and later his father Maximilian’s governors, Philip embodied Burgundian princely ideals. Chroniclers like Molinet and civic records show the towns celebrated his tournaments, jousts, and public appearances with real enthusiasm. His youth, beauty, and generosity made him a “darling prince” of the Netherlands, especially compared to his stern father Maximilian, who was often unpopular due to taxation.
The Burgundian court had long been a major center of music and art. Under Philip, chapel music (notably polyphony) and court festivities thrived. He maintained a chapel with noted singers and composers, inheriting the tradition of the Burgundian School. He sponsored tournaments, pageants, and elaborate entries that combined civic ritual and artistic display. Compared to Ferdinand the Catholic or later Charles V, Philip’s religiosity was not especially remarked upon. Chroniclers do not emphasize him as devout — more as worldly.
Philip was renowned by the many lovers he reportedly kept. Yet, there are no documented records of illegitimate children. This absence does not necessarily mean that Philip had none. What is clear is that none were publicly acknowledged or played any political role.
Sources note his skill in tournaments, jousts, and hunting. He had a reputation for physical vigor, sportsmanship, and elegance in courtly displays. Ambassadors from Italy and Burgundy highlighted his charisma, elegance of dress, and courtly behavior. He was repeatedly described as tall, strong, and graceful in movement, with a fair complexion and light-colored hair (often said to be blond or light brown). Because of his remarkable physical appearance, which contemporaries praised as unusually attractive, was called "the Handsome".
Venetian ambassador Vincenzo Querini wrote to the Venetian Signory in a dispatch dated 30 March 1505 describing Philip roughly as follows:
“He is about 28 years old, above middle stature, of fair proportions, handsome, and of a most pleasing appearance, and most gracious both in manner and language.”
In a letter from 13 July 1505 addressed to Fray Hernando de Talavera, Pedro Mártir de Angleria says:
“I know Philip personally, and I have studied carefully his character. He was intimate with me when he came to Spain... On earth there is no one more affable than Philip; no prince among the world’s princes braver; none more beautiful among the young; none more loving of virtues among men. His bearing is marvelous, his beauty most pleasing, his delicacy most delicious.”
In his account of Philip’s 1501 entry into Spain, the Burgundian chronicler Laurent Vital notes how crowds adored his “youth, beauty and grace.” Louis XII of France when seeing him is reported to have said: “What a handsome prince!” (“Que voilà un beau prince”).
However, chroniclers also noted he could be capricious, vain, proud, frivolous, manipulative, politically cunning, ambitious, and sometimes unscrupulous, which contrasted with his physical allure and made his reign short-lived and politically turbulent.
Venetian envoys and other ambassadors indeed left accounts describing Philip’s behavior toward Juana as cold and disdainful. They observed that he kept mistresses openly, neglected his wife, and sometimes treated her with humiliating indifference. Philip’s conduct worsened Juana’s fragile state.
Philip’s rule in Castile was marked by tension between local nobles and his foreign advisors. His reliance on Flemish favorites—who often received lands, offices, or privileges—fueled perceptions of nepotism and favoritism toward outsiders. Yet, some Castilian nobles and conversos, who had been targets of inquisitorial scrutiny, viewed Philip as a potential protector. His opposition to Ferdinand's policies, including those related to the Inquisition, made him an attractive alternative to the established order.
Philip the Handsome’s health had already shown signs of fragility earlier in 1506, during his enforced stay in England after storms drove his ship to the Dorset coast. Contemporary reports mention that he suffered from a fever or a serious illness, delaying his departure until he had recovered sufficiently to continue on to Castile. Later that year, Philip died suddenly in Burgos at the age of twenty-eight. According to contemporary reports, after vigorous exercise he drank cold water—others alleged he had eaten fruit—and soon developed a fatal fever.
The abruptness of his final illness gave rise to persistent rumors of poisoning. Some contemporaries suggested that his father-in-law, Ferdinand of Aragon, who regained authority in Castile after Philip’s death, may have arranged his removal. Venetian envoys and other diplomats recorded these suspicions, and Queen Juana herself was said to believe that her husband had been poisoned. Modern historians, however, emphasize the absence of convincing evidence. They note that his prior illness in England, coupled with symptoms compatible with plague, typhoid, or another acute infection, point to natural causes rather than assassination. While stories of poisoning circulated widely in diplomatic correspondence and subsequent tradition, the precise cause of Philip’s death remains uncertain.
Joanna of Castile, imagined by AI
Credits: @bringing_history_to_life (Instagram)
Catherine of Aragon’s attempts to send gifts to her sister Juana of Castile
Catherine of Aragon made concerted efforts to send gifts to her sister during the period of Juana’s confinement at Tordesillas. However, these efforts were frequently obstructed by political restrictions and the strict supervision of Juana’s household.[1]
Evidence from contemporary correspondence and royal inventories indicates that Catherine—by that time Queen of England—maintained a keen concern for her sister’s welfare, particularly following the deaths of their parents and of Juana’s husband, Philip the Handsome. Catherine either dispatched or requested emissaries to deliver luxurious clothing, fine textiles, devotional items, and occasionally monetary gifts or specially prepared foods.[2]
“The Queen, our lady of England, shows great tenderness for Queen Doña Juana, her sister, and has ordered that certain garments and devotional objects be sent to her, with requests that they be delivered into her own hands. Her Highness says that not a day passes without her praying to God for the health and happiness of our Queen.” -Luis Caroz, Spanish ambassador in England, to King Ferdinand of Aragon, dated London, 1511.
The broader political context, however, severely constrained the efficacy of these gestures. Juana’s confinement was tightly controlled, initially by her father, King Fernando of Aragon, and subsequently by her son, Emperor Charles V. Access to Juana was highly restricted, resulting in many letters or parcels intended for her being intercepted, withheld, or otherwise redirected. In several instances, Juana was reportedly unaware of her sister’s efforts to communicate or send gifts.[3]
In conclusion, while Catherine of Aragon’s actions demonstrate a sustained effort to maintain familial ties and provide material support, the political and dynastic context surrounding Juana’s confinement rendered most of these attempts ineffectual.
[1]: Calendar of State Papers, Spain, vol. 1 (1485–1509), ed. G.A. Bergenroth (London, 1862), pp. 412–414.
[2]: María del Carmen García Herrero, Las mujeres de los Reyes Católicos (Madrid: Alianza, 2004), pp. 214–216.
[3]: Bethany Aram, Juana the Mad: Sovereignty and Dynasty in Renaissance Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005), pp. 179–182.
Juana of Castile and Catherine of Aragon
Raised together at the brilliant court of their parents, Juana and Catherine received an education exceptional even by royal standards. Both were instructed in languages, theology, philosophy, and the arts, and nurtured in the devout piety that defined Queen Isabel’s household. Despite the six-year age difference, they were close during childhood, forming an affectionate bond rooted in the intellectual and religious atmosphere of their mother’s court.
The political designs of their parents soon separated them. Juana was married to Philip the Handsome, heir to the Holy Roman Empire, securing the Habsburg alliance; Catherine was wed to Arthur of Wales and later to his brother Henry VIII, binding Spain to England.
In 1501, Juana reportedly sent greetings and best wishes for her sister’s new life via ambassadors and secretaries from the courts of Castile and Flanders. Letters from Luis Caroz, the Spanish ambassador in England, which note that Juana wished Catherine happiness and well-being. Reports by Fuensalida to King Fernando and to Juana herself, which mention that these congratulatory messages were delivered.
In 1502, Arthur of Wales died just five months after the marriage. Juana expressed her sorrow over her sister’s loss, again using official messengers, as recorded in ambassadorial reports.
A chronicler notes a happy encounter at Guitres between Juana and a group of Spanish musicians and trumpeters who had just returned from England. These men had been part of the entourage that served Catherine at the English court. Juana was delighted to hear news of her sister and listened with great interest as the trumpeters described Catherine’s honorable reception by King Henry VII and the English people.
In 1504, Catherine was a young widow living in relative isolation in England, a period during which her future marriage was being negotiated with Prince Henry. She received distressing news about her mother's health during this time. Juana wrote to inform her of Queen Isabel’s recurring agues and fevers. On 26 November, their mother passed away, and Juana succeeded to the throne of Castile by right of inheritance. From that moment onward, Catherine was only Infanta of Aragon, daughter of King Fernando II.
Juana and her husband unexpectedly arrived in England in early 1506 due to a storm during their voyage from Flanders to Castile. They were received by Henry VII at Windsor Castle. This unexpected sojourn afforded Juana a rare opportunity to see Catherine, whom she had not met since departing Castile for Flanders nearly a decade earlier. Yet their long-awaited reunion proved constrained and unsatisfactory.
Contemporary accounts and later historians agree that the sisters’ meeting at Windsor was formal and closely supervised, allowing them little privacy in which to speak freely. The reasons for the brevity of their encounter remain uncertain: Juana herself brought the visit to an abrupt close, perhaps owing to political caution, her husband’s influence, or the emotional strain of her circumstances. Catherine later expressed her conflicting emotions in a letter to her sister
‘’I must express the joy that I felt when I saw you in this Kingdom, and the distress that filled my soul only a few hours afterwards because of the sudden and hasty departure you made from here."
Catherine was appointed ambassador of Aragon to England in 1507, a groundbreaking and empowering moment that, for the first time, allowed her to take charge of her own political fate. After Philip the Handsome's death, Henry VII of England wanted to marry the young and beautiful queen of Castile. Juana seems to have bewitched him during her short stay at Windsor.
Catherine, under pressure from her father and the king of England, encouraged Juana toward the match with Henry VII. Juana's unwillingness to remarry—combined with her confinement in Tordesillas—put an end to Henry VII’s hopes of acquiring a wealthy and politically advantageous bride.
A few months after her husband’s death, and while in a state of profound distress and isolation, Juana gave birth to her youngest child, whom she named Catalina—perhaps as a gesture of sisterly affection toward her sister, the princess of Wales.
After Juana’s confinement at Tordesillas began in the aftermath of Philip the Handsome’s death, her correspondence became increasingly irregular and tightly controlled. Every letter she attempted to send or receive had to pass through her keepers and the royal council, who routinely intercepted, censored, or destroyed much of her mail to prevent unauthorized communication and potential political maneuvering. Guards and officials reported all of her words and writings to the king’s representatives, ensuring that her activities were closely monitored.
The confinement not only curtailed Juana’s political agency but also severed her from almost all contact with her family, including her younger sister. Catherine is believed to have sought news of Juana through diplomatic intermediaries—a faint thread of sisterly concern that endured despite the walls of Tordesillas.
In his correspondence with secretaries and agents of state, Fernando of Aragon makes reference to letters received from his daughter Catherine, in which she inquired after the welfare of her sister Juana. The king’s responses, offering reassurance of Juana’s health and safety, attest to Catherine’s enduring solicitude for her sister during the years of her seclusion (1).
Several dispatches from Spanish envoys in England mention Catherine’s expressions of sorrow for her sister’s confinement. For instance, Chapuys’s dispatch of 1531 notes Catherine’s “pious compassion toward the Queen of Castile, her sister, whose misfortunes she bears as her own.” (2)
Catherine of Aragon died on 7 January 1536 at Kimbolton Castle, after years of isolation imposed by her husband, King Henry VIII, who had repudiated her in order to marry Anne Boleyn. Conscious of the potential impact of such news on his mother, whose mental state remained fragile, Charles V instructed his officials to inform her “with moderation and piety.” Juana, long confined in Tordesillas, had maintained a profound affection for her sister, and Charles feared that the announcement might aggravate her condition.(3)
According to reports from her household, the news of her sister’s death was communicated to her with great prudence. Her confessor, Fray Luis Ferrer, wrote that upon hearing the news,
“She showed great sorrow, withdrawing from everyone and remaining in silence for a long time.”
At first, Juana reportedly refused to believe that Catherine was dead. One of her attendants, Doña María de Ulloa, later testified that the Queen said,
“The Queen of England cannot be dead; God would not allow it.”
When she was finally persuaded that her sister had indeed passed away, Juana ordered masses to be celebrated for Catherine’s soul and spent the evening in vigils and prayer, refusing food and speaking little.
Among the portraits of her family members that Juana kept at her residence in Tordesillas were those of Catherine. Some historians have suggested that Juana may have received these portraits directly from her sister in 1506, when she and her husband, Philip the Handsome, stopped in England. Although inventories of Juana’s possessions confirm the existence of these portraits, they provide no information regarding the artist or the appearance of the images, leaving their exact likeness unknown.
(1) Cartas de Fernando el Católico (edited by José Sancho Rayón, Madrid, 1872)
(2) Letters and Papers, Foreign and Domestic, Henry VIII, vol. 5
(3 )Calendar of State Papers, Spanish, Volume 5, Part 2: 1536–1538, ed. Pascual de Gayangos (London: Longman, Green, Longman, & Roberts, 1888), no. 4.
After Queen Isabel’s death in 1504, Juana inherited the throne of Castile. However, her mental health—or at least the perception of it—became a major issue. She was described as melancholic, obsessive, and prone to deep grief, especially after the death of her husband Philip the Handsome in 1506. Her father, Fernando, and later her son, Carlos V, used her supposed instability to control Castile politically, effectively confining her in the palace at Tordesillas for decades.
In his dispatches to Emperor Charles V, Eustace Chapuys recorded that Katherine often asked after her sister’s health and situation in Tordesillas. He added that Katherine “loved her sister tenderly, and mourned her misfortunes as if they were her own.”
These remarks appear in the Calendar of State Papers, Spain, where Chapuys’ letters are preserved. They show that although Katherine herself left no surviving direct letter on Juana’s confinement, her concern was well known and diplomatically reported.
From Oil to Life
Prompt : Recreate this image of Joanna of Castile. It should look like it was taken on an old iPhone.
Was Juana of Castile on the Autism Spectrum?
Though it is dangerous and difficult to attempt a diagnosis of any condition, physical or mental, many centuries after someone died, we must consider the suggestions. Juana has been said to have had extreme postpartum depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and any number of serious psychological disorders. What has not been discussed is the notion of Juana merely being neurodivergent.
The historical record before 1509 supports Juana being at least neurodivergent. She was considered extremely intelligent when she was young. Although high intelligence does not mean somebody is on the autism spectrum, they are a common pair. Juana did not see the value in Catholicism, perhaps not understanding the social and political necessity of maintaining an outward adherence to religion. She did not have the social awareness to understand and accept her husband Philip’s philandering, which was sadly almost expected of high-ranking noblemen at the time. Juana had what could be called meltdowns, another hallmark of being on the autism spectrum. She became very dedicated to, if not obsessed with, burying Philip as he wanted. In the process, as discussed, she engaged in behaviour that, while theoretically logical, would have looked odd to observers. All of this is to say that there probably was nothing ‘wrong’ with Juana. She was more guileless and direct than her father, which would have made her a good and practical ruler but easy prey for someone like Ferdinand of Aragon. And so this queen, martyred for her different mind, wept and wasted away in Tordesillas until her death.
Heather R.Darsie, Katharine of Aragon, Spanish Princess: 'I am not as Simple as I May Seem'