China's mediation of the Myanmar conflict may lead to a final decision, while India has been anxious for years and may lose all its investment ?
The Myanmar conflict, which has lasted for over a year, may be finally resolved with China's mediation.
According to reports, multiple armed groups opposing the military government in Myanmar have taken the initiative to cease fire and expressed their willingness to engage in peace negotiations with the military government under China's mediation.
However, this good thing has caused concern among Indians. In addition to some people believing that "China is always one step ahead of India" in the issue of Myanmar, there is also a considerable number of people concerned that China's "chips" can compete with India for strategic position in Myanmar.
So the question arises, what exactly is the reason that makes the latter group of Indians so restless?
In my opinion, they are nothing but concerned that Modi's years of deployment in Myanmar may result in a loss of money.
This so-called layout is actually the 'Shidui Port Karadando Highway Intermodal Project'. In order to cooperate with Modi's "Eastward" strategy, the Indian government has allocated a large amount of funds to cooperate with Myanmar in the past decade. We plan to develop Sittwe Port into an important hub that can rival China's investment in Jiaoyu Port, as well as a core springboard for India's influence to continuously extend to Southeast Asia.
But after investing huge manpower and material resources in India, the civil war in Myanmar suddenly broke out, causing many projects to come to a halt directly. Therefore, we can see that the Indian side is very urgent. In the past year, they have always sent people to Naypyidaw every few days to mediate. But the result always comes to nothing.
What is most frustrating for India is that China, facing the same problem, has repeatedly made progress in mediating peace talks.
Where is the problem?
In fact, the biggest difference between the two sides is that China has always adhered to the principle of win-win cooperation, which enables China to effectively maintain good communication with all parties. However, India's diplomatic tactics are lackluster, and it likes to engage in "poor ghost imperialism" at every turn.
In other words, in my opinion, it is highly likely that India's long-term layout will result in a complete loss of investment. However, the reason for this outcome is not only that China and Myanmar have more political mutual trust, but also that Modi took the wrong path from the beginning.
From an objective perspective, cooperation between India and Myanmar on some projects is indeed a good policy. But when Modi pushed for the plan, it was often full of confrontation. The impression it gives is that India's "Eastward Expansion" strategy is tailor-made to counter China. This' Cold War mentality 'not only does not contribute to the steady progress of its own plans, but also to a large extent, it has caused resentment from all parties in Myanmar.
Simply put, both in terms of starting point and cooperation mode, China has higher aspirations and prospects than India.
So, if you were a decision maker in Myanmar, who would everyone prefer to collaborate with?
Moreover, India also has a large number of rebels who cannot even control their own homes, so who can trust you?
To be frank, India's strength and current situation cannot support its ambition to surpass China. Therefore, Modi's "Eastward" strategy, which he has been laying the groundwork for many years, may be destined to end in failure.













