A Nation Decides
For those of us who are, like me, of the more liberal persuasion, 2016 could be seen as a year of political disappointments. Between Britain voting to leave the European Union and America electing an overgrown child with a blatant disregard for women, foreigners and journalists as their president-elect, it could be said that this has been a very bad year for the left. Enter Nana Akufo-Addo. Born in 1944, Nana is the Flag-Bearer (leader) of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), and as of Sunday December 10th 2016( after securing 53.27 of the total votes from 233 of the 275 constituencies) the new President of the Republic of Ghana. In a fiercely contested race, Nana was not only able to defeat incumbent President, John Dramani Mahama of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), but was able to break, as one newspaper reported (in one the best pieces of political satire I've ever read) the myth "that without John prefixing your name you cannot be President of Ghana" (the past 24 years the Presidents have been: John Mahama, John Mills, John Kufour and Jerry John Rawlings). A few weeks ago I happened to sit in on a meeting of the NDC, at that point still in government, and let Eunice, an NDC supporter with very good english translate what was being promised by the prospective MP. They included building of a Tarmac road, expanded hospital capacity and better toilets for the village. Now, even though these would have been extremely good things for the people of the region, when I asked Eunice where the money to pay for all this would come from, there didn't really seem to be an answer. And when, at the end of the meeting, the speaker starting handing out money to the people, I had my mind made up about the NDC. It seemed to me, and to a lot of Ghanaians that I spoke to on the subject, that they're campaign seemed to largely based on empty promises and rhetoric (which can in no way be linked to Western politics *cough cough Donald Trump's promise of a Muslim Registry cough cough*). However, even though his government has become renowned for corruption, corruption that Nana has promised to deal with when in office, there is one thing that Mahama and the NDC can be commended for. In November, Mahama made a speech while campaigning in the Greater Accra Region, declaring that him, and the NDC, would accept the result of the Election and urged the opposition parties to do the same. Even though he also used the speech to accuse other parties of trying to throw the result of the upcoming election (that he was sure he was going to win) into disrepute, there must be something said about his, and the opposition parties upholding of the democratic process. Having only regained multi-party democracy in 1991, after being a one-party state since the country gained independence in 1957, the democratic process, and especially the electoral process, is still quite a delicate thing here, even to the point that a lot of the news coverage on and around the election focused on the calls for free and fair election from everyone from religious leaders to the international community, and so Mahama's call to accept the result of the election, no matter the result, should not be underestimated in its importance. Especially when you compare it to the run up of the U.S. Election, where Donald Trump said that he would only accept the result of the election 'if he won'. Compare the two and you get two completely different stories. One is a country that has only had free and fair elections for 24 years, whose potential leaders respect and upheld the democratic process; and the other that has always prided itself on its democracy and it's freedom, whose leader categorically says that he would not listen to the people if they weren't saying what he wanted to hear. It really should be the other way round shouldn't it? Like The Gambia's President Yahya Jammeh; who has refused to accept the result of his country's election, which saw Mr Amada Barrow emerge victorious on December 1st, and has launched his country into internal turmoil, with Barrow telling the BBC that we will declare himself President of The Gambia on January 18th, while Jammeh has both launched a court action to annul the result, as well as his security forces seizing control of the electoral commission in the capital, Banjul. It is scary when the "land of the free" starts to undermine on of the underlying freedoms that has formed the basis of the country since its birth. It is even more scary when you think of what effect it could have on the wider world. Here in Ghana, The west, and especially America, it's very much looked up to; there are shoes that have the Stars and Stripes printed on them, Obama opened a university here, and guess what I saw on the front cover of some of my students exercise books? A picture of Barack Obama shaking hands with Hilary Clinton. And so when you have a candidate for the Presidency of that county openly say that he "doesn't care" about people's outrage at his undermining of democracy, it sets a dangerous precedent for democracy going forward, especially if that man goes on to win the election. However, not all is lost. I showed my JHS1 class a picture of Donald Trump the other day, their thoughts went pretty much this: -White Man is ugly -Obama is better looking -don't want him in charge of a country -He is (and these are their words) a White Monkey So at least the Ghanaian youth know a bad egg when they see it. Until next time, Lukas
















